On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 20:39:02 UTC, Johnson Jones wrote:
I'm very few BP's are working now ;/
Getting that error on most of the lines of code I have
https://ibb.co/cVVSSF
Not sure why it broke all of a sudden. Since these things seem
to be relatively random I'll play around with it afte
I'm very few BP's are working now ;/
Getting that error on most of the lines of code I have
https://ibb.co/cVVSSF
Not sure why it broke all of a sudden. Since these things seem to
be relatively random I'll play around with it after a while.
Maybe a more informative error message could be adde
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 17:55:04 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
On 07.08.2017 19:37, Johnson Jones wrote:
[...]
mixins are magic, as they usually also involve CTFE. Did you
enable "mixin analysis" in the intellisense options?
yes.
On 07.08.2017 04:25, Johnson Jones wrote:
https://ibb.co/kaJAwa
That shows a screen shot of the behavior. Not sure why some type are not
showing while others are. They are all from gtkD. Most seem to be window.
Looking at window, it looks like the only field defined is
/** the main Gt
On 07.08.2017 19:37, Johnson Jones wrote:
Tried to do some work this morning and Intellisense is not showing.
Not sure what happened. Working fine yesterday.
It seems that when I converted my code to automatically generate some
fields, the semantic engine is not seeing them ;/
I went from
On 06.08.2017 21:41, FoxyBrown wrote:
[gdk.Event.Event]D0006: Error: Type resolve failed
This looks like it is showing the derived or the base type. If it is the
former the name is read from memory and it is possible that is not
available in the current binary.
object@ObjectD00
Tried to do some work this morning and Intellisense is not
showing.
Not sure what happened. Working fine yesterday.
It seems that when I converted my code to automatically generate
some fields, the semantic engine is not seeing them ;/
I went from something like
struct X
{
int a;
}
to
