Re: Linux 64bit branch

2014-01-12 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Sunday, 12 January 2014 at 20:43:24 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote: On Sunday, 12 January 2014 at 20:13:35 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote: On Sunday, 12 January 2014 at 11:42:30 UTC, Jacob Carlborg Ok, I see. Have you verified that you have all the necessary libraries installed? They're listed

Re: Linux 64bit branch

2014-01-12 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Sunday, 12 January 2014 at 20:13:35 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote: On Sunday, 12 January 2014 at 11:42:30 UTC, Jacob Carlborg Ok, I see. Have you verified that you have all the necessary libraries installed? They're listed here: https://github.com/d-widget-toolkit/dwt#linux Not yet, wi

Re: Linux 64bit branch

2014-01-12 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Sunday, 12 January 2014 at 11:42:30 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: * Most changes seems to be related to changing "int" to "size_t" or "ptrdiff_t". "int" was used because that's what the Java API uses. Java doesn't even have unsigned types. Is the changes really necessary? Does it require a lot

Linux 64bit branch

2014-01-11 Thread Jesse Phillips
I wanted to mention that I have a branch for the base and gtk repositories which compile under 64bit. https://github.com/JesseKPhillips/base/tree/64bit https://github.com/JesseKPhillips/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86/tree/64bit I don't know if changes are correct, in the since that I don't have

Re: Compiling the hello world example fails

2013-08-23 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Friday, 23 August 2013 at 15:11:32 UTC, chmike wrote: I installed dmd and dwt on my linux 13.04 PC. I also installed all the dependencies. I successfully compiled dwt. But compiling the main.d fails with an ld error. It is a incompatibility with 32/64 bit, you likely will have dependency c

Re: DWT in Google Summer of Code?

2012-03-07 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Saturday, 3 March 2012 at 21:12:19 UTC, Sandeep Datta wrote: I thing a stable GUI library is very important for D. +1 to that. But I think using using SWT as inspiration for a GUI library may not be the best possible choice. I would like to see an API which uses D well. Small things like u

Re: DWT repository moved to github

2012-01-09 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Monday, 9 January 2012 at 23:06:12 UTC, kntroh wrote: I've now moved the DWT repository to github. The old mercurial repository is split into several repository, all available under an organization: https://github.com/d-widget-toolkit Do I need to make my repository on github to send pull

Re: Would GIT submodules be a good idea?

2011-08-17 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:26:14 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > Java runtime > Eclipse runtime (java runtime) > DWT (Eclipse runtime) > JFace (DWT) > snippets (jface) > > This is how the dependencies look like. Read "->" as depends on > > Java runtime -> > Eclipse runtime -> java runtime > DWT -> Ec

Re: Would GIT submodules be a good idea?

2011-08-17 Thread Jesse Phillips
torhu Wrote: > Okay, I think I get the picture now. Sounds like a good plan, then. > > Would DWT become a single repository with all platform implementations > and snippets in it, that has the base Java library as a submodule? Or > would it be dwt-win, dwt-linux, dwt-snippets, etc.? The form

Re: Would GIT submodules be a good idea?

2011-08-17 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:46:23 +0200, torhu wrote: > If submodules are meant for the same use cases as SVN externals, they > are primarily for automatically pulling in stuff that is separate > because it is actually a separate project, probably maintained by > someone else, or maybe just hosted else

Re: Would GIT submodules be a good idea?

2011-08-16 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:46:28 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > Not all top level directories need to be submodules, that was just a > thought. I could include everything to make it possible to build DWT in > one repository (the super repository) and have everything else in > submodules. Looking a li

Re: Would GIT submodules be a good idea?

2011-08-16 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:54:16 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > I'm not exactly sure what you mean with "one source base", because > currently all OS specific stuff are in one repository. > >> But do you really need submodules? If you want dwt you'll either pull >> in dtw-win dwt-linux as a submodule

Re: Would GIT submodules be a good idea?

2011-08-15 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:26:57 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > Since it seems that everyone is ok with git I will move the DWT2 > repository to github. That leads to the next question: Would git > submodules be a good idea? I haven't use submodules myself my it sounds > good in theory. I'm thinking a

Re: Move DWT2 repository - github or bitbucket?

2011-08-15 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:50:31 +0200, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > I've tried hg-git a while ago but the extension wouldn't register for me > for some reason. > > Anyway I use msysgit now, it's not *too* bad, but you really have to > know your way around the shell. E.g. viewing logs uses HJKL keys and

Re: Move DWT2 repository - github or bitbucket?

2011-08-11 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:58:23 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > I'm planning to move the DWT2 repository to either github or bitbucket. > Which one would you prefer? I vote for github, but I'd like to hear from those that do have forks on bitbucket. I'm not sure if the choice would effect how likely

Re: DWT2 now looks working on Windows (except Text widget doesn't support UTF-8)

2011-08-05 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:36:02 -0700, Andrew Wiley wrote: > Actually, it looks like you can use Mercurial with Github: > https://github.com/blog/439-hg-git-mercurial-plugin Not sure if there's > an equivalent go go from a Mercurial server to a Git client. You use the same tool but it isn't as easy.

Re: DWT2 now looks working on Windows (except Text widget doesn't support UTF-8)

2011-08-05 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:00:37 +0300, Denis Shelomovskij wrote: > I don't use SCM often. IMHO, SCM should just work. HG is simplier than > Git (not only IMHO). So, it's a Git issue (for me) not to be as simple > as HG. I didn't use SCM much either, but then I learned git. I'm sure HG is just as ea

Re: DWT2 now looks working on Windows (except Text widget doesn't support UTF-8)

2011-08-05 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 08:38:55 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > I like both git and github more than mercurial and bitbucket. Many seem > to switch to github for their D development; DMD, Phobos Druntime; all > of them are now on github. But on the other hand the DWT repository is > already a mercuri

Re: DWT2 now looks working on Windows (except Text widget doesn't support UTF-8)

2011-08-04 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:27:26 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > I'm so sorry. I haven't prioritized DWT and I've forgotten pull requests > and patches in tickets. I will look into this. Maybe I can move the > repository to bitbucket or github, this will make it easier creating and > merging pull reque

Re: What's up with DWTx?

2008-11-03 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:28:42 +0100, Frank Benoit wrote: > Jesse Phillips schrieb: >> I'm trying to install the entire suite here. I got all the basics, DMD, >> Tango .99.7, DSSS, and DWT 3.4-1. I even have Derelict installed to run >> the OpenGL stuff. I am unable to get

What's up with DWTx?

2008-10-31 Thread Jesse Phillips
I'm trying to install the entire suite here. I got all the basics, DMD, Tango .99.7, DSSS, and DWT 3.4-1. I even have Derelict installed to run the OpenGL stuff. I am unable to get the dwt-addons to compile, specifically looking at JFace. (This is all of course in Linux) I just run $ dsss build

Re: DWT package mapping?

2008-10-21 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:27:15 +0200, Frank Benoit wrote: > At the moment there are these mappings > > org.eclipse.swt -> dwt > org.eclipse -> dwtx > > Symbols: > SWT -> DWT > SWTError-> DWTError > SWTException-> DWTException > ... > > But there are more candidates for