On 2008-11-09 19:50, deadimp wrote:
Mebbe the naiive expectations arise because most compilers (those for D, C++, C#, C, Java) take the expression `15 + 0.6` and returns a double - the highest general 'blanketing' type - even though the first operand is an int. I forgot what this concept was calle
Christopher Wright wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:18 PM, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i created to include file, 1 with 'module xxx' declaration and the
other without it. but i still can import both files. what is the diff
here?
Not a lot. The module decla
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
deadimp escribió:
That's the problem I had mentioned, though - the type of the entire
array being inferred from the first element rather than the context
(i.e. what it's initializing if not declared as 'auto') or subsequent
elements (which would be a bit difficult...).
W
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:18 PM, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i created to include file, 1 with 'module xxx' declaration and the other
without it. but i still can import both files. what is the diff here?
Not a lot. The module declaration doesn't serve much pu
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:18 PM, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i created to include file, 1 with 'module xxx' declaration and the other
without it. but i still can import both files. what is the diff here?
Not a lot. The module declaration doesn't serve much pu
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Jarrett Billingsley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:18 PM, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> i created to include file, 1 with 'module xxx' declaration and the other
>> without it. but i still can import both files. what is the diff here?
>
