On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:34:52 +0300, Kagamin wrote:
Derek Parnell Wrote:
I think he wants to have some objects constructed at compile-time.
Sure he wants. From my point of view, this technique is supposed to be a
means to solve some problem rather than problem itself. But this problem
wa
Weed пишет:
Kagamin пишет:
Weed Wrote:
Sure he wants. From my point of view, this technique is supposed to
be a means to solve some problem rather than problem itself. But
this problem was not put.
please read it thread:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars
Kagamin пишет:
Weed Wrote:
Sure he wants. From my point of view, this technique is supposed to be a means
to solve some problem rather than problem itself. But this problem was not put.
please read it thread:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id
Weed Wrote:
> > Sure he wants. From my point of view, this technique is supposed to be a
> > means to solve some problem rather than problem itself. But this problem
> > was not put.
>
> please read it thread:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_i
Sergey Gromov Wrote:
> C++ static object constructors execute at run time except for trivial
> cases.
Although I think it's not guaranteed to work this way and compiler decides when
to execute constructor. So code should be ready for run-time evaluation. And as
code evolves those constructors c
Kagamin пишет:
Derek Parnell Wrote:
I think he wants to have some objects constructed at compile-time.
Sure he wants. From my point of view, this technique is supposed to be a means
to solve some problem rather than problem itself. But this problem was not put.
please read it thread:
http:
Kagamin пишет:
Derek Parnell Wrote:
I think he wants to have some objects constructed at compile-time.
Sure he wants. From my point of view, this technique is supposed to be a means
to solve some problem rather than problem itself. But this problem was not put.
Please read even this editi
Derek Parnell Wrote:
> I think he wants to have some objects constructed at compile-time.
Sure he wants. From my point of view, this technique is supposed to be a means
to solve some problem rather than problem itself. But this problem was not put.
