On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Weed wrote:
> It is possible to disable GC?
>
> That it has not been included in result binary for an increasing
> performance of pointers operation and reduction of the sizes of the binary
>
> I have not found the answer in google.
>
You can disable the GC by usin
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:38:45 +0700, Weed wrote:
> It is possible to disable GC?
>
> That it has not been included in result binary for an increasing
> performance of ref operations and reduction of the size of the binary
>
> I have not found the answer in google.
You can find some more answers,
Hello Joel,
Hello all,
I'm a C programmer with some C++ experience ("C with Classes"+STL
anyway; never did implement anything but the most trivial templates)
and I'm looking to get stated with D. I figured a good way to do that
would be to implement a template library, and it may as well be
som
Hello Bill,
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Joel C. Salomon
• a library for dimensional analysis, like boost::units, and/or
I always found this kind of thing boring, also I see it as kind of
useless overhead that I don't want in my calculations. But it could
be a nice way to get your feet w
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Chris Nicholson-Sauls
wrote:
The
second reason, is that before every allocation the garbage collector will
perform a collection run. This can actually be disabled (at least in
theory) if you plan on doing several allocations in a short
Weed wrote:
> It is possible to disable GC?
Yes. See std.gc or tango.core.Memory.
> That it has not been included in result binary for an increasing
> performance of ref operations and reduction of the size of the binary
I don't know what "ref operations" are, but odds are disabling the GC
wil
It is possible to disable GC?
That it has not been included in result binary for an increasing
performance of ref operations and reduction of the size of the binary
I have not found the answer in google.
It is possible to disable GC?
That it has not been included in result binary for an increasing
performance of pointers operation and reduction of the sizes of the binary
I have not found the answer in google.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Jarrett Billingsley
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:15 PM, grauzone wrote:
>> If he had to use OS specific APIs (which would be another sad thing about
>> Tango), I'd suggest to use clock_gettime() with CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID
>> under Unix.
>>
>> What is timex?
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:15 PM, grauzone wrote:
> If he had to use OS specific APIs (which would be another sad thing about
> Tango), I'd suggest to use clock_gettime() with CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID
> under Unix.
>
> What is timex?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timex_(Unix)
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Matthias Walter
wrote:
Hi there,
I'd like to time some functions using Tango, but only including the really used
CPU-time. StopWatch and the other time functions I've found don't mind on the
CPU usage, which means if I time multiple
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Matthias Walter
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'd like to time some functions using Tango, but only including the really
> used CPU-time. StopWatch and the other time functions I've found don't mind
> on the CPU usage, which means if I time multiple processes at once whi
Hi there,
I'd like to time some functions using Tango, but only including the really used
CPU-time. StopWatch and the other time functions I've found don't mind on the
CPU usage, which means if I time multiple processes at once which share a
single CPU, their times increase...
Best regards
Mat
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Chris Nicholson-Sauls
wrote:
> The
> second reason, is that before every allocation the garbage collector will
> perform a collection run. This can actually be disabled (at least in
> theory) if you plan on doing several allocations in a short period of time,
> and
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:25:29 +0100, Mike wrote:
Never mind - as it usually is, 5 minutes after sending a question to a NG
(after 2 hours of wasted time) you have the correct idea. In this case, I
called "avcodec_register_all" instead of "av_register_all" before
"avformat_open_input_file".
Hi!
I'm trying to get ffmpeg to work with D; I've got some stuff running, but
... well.
av_open_input_file gives me -2 as an error and I can't figure out what
this means (the #defines for the error codes are impossible to understand,
much less translate to D). Anybody ever done that and c
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Joel C. Salomon wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm a C programmer with some C++ experience ("C with Classes"+STL
> anyway; never did implement anything but the most trivial templates) and
> I'm looking to get stated with D. I figured a good way to do that would
> be to imp
Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
Lars Kyllingstad wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
Lars Kyllingstad wrote:
[snip]
From a performance
perspective, however, it carries with it the overhead of an extra
function call, which I'm not sure I want.
-Lars
You're worried about a second function call which coul
Hello all,
I’m a C programmer with some C++ experience (“C with Classes”+STL
anyway; never did implement anything but the most trivial templates) and
I’m looking to get stated with D. I figured a good way to do that would
be to implement a template library, and it may as well be something I’ll
act
Lars Kyllingstad wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
Lars Kyllingstad wrote:
[snip]
From a performance
perspective, however, it carries with it the overhead of an extra
function call, which I'm not sure I want.
-Lars
You're worried about a second function call which could potentially be
inlined, yet
akcom wrote:
What is the state of the win32 headers?
Looking for people like you to help complete the work. But usable.
Stewart.
"Jarrett Billingsley" wrote in message
news:mailman.637.1233680615.22690.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:51 AM, nobody wrote:
>> Would you also happen to know why the following gives an error?
>>
>> arr[1] = arr[$-1];// main.d(11): Error: cannot assign to s
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:51 AM, nobody wrote:
> Would you also happen to know why the following gives an error?
>
> arr[1] = arr[$-1];// main.d(11): Error: cannot assign to static array
arr[1][] = arr[$-1][];
You cannot reassign what fixed-size array references point to, but you
can copy t
"Jarrett Billingsley" wrote in message
news:mailman.636.1233678501.22690.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:54 AM, nobody wrote:
>> Let's see if I understand memmove..
>> The way it's used here, it copies the tail of an array onto that same
>> array,
>> only start
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:54 AM, nobody wrote:
> Let's see if I understand memmove..
> The way it's used here, it copies the tail of an array onto that same array,
> only starting one index earlier, thus removing the undesired element?
> Neat.
Right.
> However I just realized that order does not
"Jarrett Billingsley" wrote in message
news:mailman.635.1233675301.22690.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Frank Benoit
> wrote:
>>
>> arr = arr[ 0 .. lowerBound ] ~ arr[ upperBound .. $ ];
>>
>
> That's simple enough, but inefficient.
>
> Something like th
"Frank Benoit" wrote
> nobody schrieb:
>> "Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:op.uor1gzqho7c...@korden-pc...
>>> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:46:52 +0300, nobody
>>> wrote:
>>>
What is the best way to completely remove an element from an array?
For example you h
"Frank Benoit" wrote in message
news:gm9n0e$314...@digitalmars.com...
> nobody schrieb:
>> "Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:op.uor1gzqho7c...@korden-pc...
>>> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:46:52 +0300, nobody
>>> wrote:
>>>
What is the best way to completely remove a
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Frank Benoit
wrote:
>
> arr = arr[ 0 .. lowerBound ] ~ arr[ upperBound .. $ ];
>
That's simple enough, but inefficient.
Something like this:
import std.c.string; // or import tango.stdc.string;
T[] erase(T)(ref T[] arr, size_t idx)
{
if(arr.length == 0)
nobody schrieb:
> "Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:op.uor1gzqho7c...@korden-pc...
>> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:46:52 +0300, nobody wrote:
>>
>>> What is the best way to completely remove an element from an array?
>>>
>>> For example you have an array:
>>> [1,2,3,4,5,6]
>>
"Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.uor1gzqho7c...@korden-pc...
> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:46:52 +0300, nobody wrote:
>
>> What is the best way to completely remove an element from an array?
>>
>> For example you have an array:
>> [1,2,3,4,5,6]
>> and want to remove eleme
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:46:52 +0300, nobody wrote:
What is the best way to completely remove an element from an array?
For example you have an array:
[1,2,3,4,5,6]
and want to remove element "3" in such a way that the resulting array is:
[1,2,4,5,6]
Thanks.
import std.array;
auto arr = [0
What is the best way to completely remove an element from an array?
For example you have an array:
[1,2,3,4,5,6]
and want to remove element "3" in such a way that the resulting array is:
[1,2,4,5,6]
Thanks.
akcom wrote:
> What is the state of the win32 headers? Is there any place where I can get
> win32 headers including winsock2?
http://www.dsource.org/projects/bindings/wiki/WindowsApi
Haven't checked on them in a while, but they should be usable.
-- Daniel
34 matches
Mail list logo
