Stewart Gordon wrote:
#include
int main() {
unsigned char z = 5;
int x = -z; // x now is 251
Needless to say, this comment is a mistake.
Stewart.
Phil Deets Wrote:
> Is there a Windows IDE with support for D2 debugging,
> building,
The Zeus IDE can be easily configured to run the D compiler
or any of the build tools:
http://www.zeusedit.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2465
> and basic code navigation (such as go to definition)?
Zeus com
Moritz Warning wrote:
ubyte z = 5;
int x = -z; // x now is 251
int y = -1 * z; // y is now -5
Indeed, I've just looked at the spec, and it appears that the promotion
of all smaller integer types to int/uint applies only to binary
operations. Why?
It even arguably breaks the "looks like C,
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:25:01 +0200, Don wrote:
> Brad Roberts wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Saaa wrote:
>>
>>> I think is very bug-prone, isn't it obvious iub should be -5?
>>>
>>> ubyte ub = 5;
>>> int iub = -ub; // iub now is 251
>>>
>>> What is the reasoning to do it this way?
>>
>> The inclu
Brad Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Saaa wrote:
I think is very bug-prone, isn't it obvious iub should be -5?
ubyte ub = 5;
int iub = -ub; // iub now is 251
What is the reasoning to do it this way?
The inclusion of the 'int' part obscures what I think the real problem
is..
Does
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Don wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote
Saaa wrote:
I think is very bug-prone, isn't it obvious iub should be -5?
ubyte ub = 5;
int iub = -ub; // iub now is 251
What is the reasoning to do it this way?
Minus toggles the most significant bit, be it on a signed
Don wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote
Saaa wrote:
I think is very bug-prone, isn't it obvious iub should be -5?
ubyte ub = 5;
int iub = -ub; // iub now is 251
What is the reasoning to do it this way?
Minus toggles the most significant bit, be it on a signed or unsigned
type. When c
Testing 1, 2, 3, testing
Saaa wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote
Saaa wrote:
I think is very bug-prone, isn't it obvious iub should be -5?
ubyte ub = 5;
int iub = -ub; // iub now is 251
What is the reasoning to do it this way?
Minus toggles the most significant bit, be it on a signed or unsigned
type. When converting it
