Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
> Bahahaha, oh comma exps.
Their usage will need to be quite regulated in D (using them for smarter
purposes is a cute idea, but it may impair C compatibility).
Bye,
bearophile
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Christopher Wright wrote:
> Justin Johansson wrote:
>>
>> Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Justin Johansson wrote:
I almost have to apologize for this question but ..
How does one initialize a static rectangular
Justin Johansson wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Justin Johansson wrote:
>
> Thanks Jarrett.
>
> Am I having a blonde day?
>
>int[2,3] m = [ 1, 2, 3 ];
>writefln( "m=%s, .sizeof=%d", m, m.sizeof);
>
> Compiles and prints:
>
> m=[1,2,3], .size
Justin Johansson wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Justin Johansson wrote:
I almost have to apologize for this question but ..
How does one initialize a static rectangular array (2-d matrix) in D1?
None of the following or other variations that I've tried com
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Justin Johansson wrote:
> > I almost have to apologize for this question but ..
> >
> > How does one initialize a static rectangular array (2-d matrix) in D1?
> >
> > None of the following or other variations that I've tried compile wit
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Justin Johansson wrote:
> > I almost have to apologize for this question but ..
> >
> > How does one initialize a static rectangular array (2-d matrix) in D1?
> >
> > None of the following or other variations that I've tried compile wit
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Justin Johansson wrote:
> I almost have to apologize for this question but ..
>
> How does one initialize a static rectangular array (2-d matrix) in D1?
>
> None of the following or other variations that I've tried compile with DMD
> 1.0.
>
> int[2, 3] matrix = [ 1
I almost have to apologize for this question but ..
How does one initialize a static rectangular array (2-d matrix) in D1?
None of the following or other variations that I've tried compile with DMD 1.0.
int[2, 3] matrix = [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ];
int[2, 3] matrix = [[ 1, 2, 3 ], [ 4, 5, 6 ]];
Max Samukha wrote:
Is it possible to get types or aliases of all constructors of a class
in D2?
No.
__traits has some random functionality in this regard. It has a command
getVirtualFunctions which only returns virtual overloads. By "virtual",
we mean "appears in vtbl". So any non-private, n
Bill Baxter wrote:
It seems macros are implemented as compiler extensions. You compile
your macros into DLLs first, that then get loaded into the compiler as
plugins. On the plus side, doing things that way you really do have
access to any API you need at compile-time, using the same syntax as
Found it out in the meantime :)
dmd test.d -L/BASE:8388608
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Don wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Don wrote:
So it looks to me like the mechanics of it are basically identical.
Just Nemerle's syntax is nicer.
Only with trivial examples. With more complicated
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Don wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Don wrote:
>>
So it looks to me like the mechanics of it are basically identical.
Just Nemerle's syntax is nicer.
>>>
>>> Only with trivial examples. With more complicated exam
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Don wrote:
So it looks to me like the mechanics of it are basically identical.
Just Nemerle's syntax is nicer.
Only with trivial examples. With more complicated examples they look less
identical. I'm basing my views on pages like this
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Don wrote:
>> So it looks to me like the mechanics of it are basically identical.
>> Just Nemerle's syntax is nicer.
>
> Only with trivial examples. With more complicated examples they look less
> identical. I'm basing my views on pages like this:
>
> http://nemerl
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Don wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Don wrote:
>>>
>>> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:17:59 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley
wrote:
> It's also insanely kludgy and ugly. Bleh.
>>>
>>>
Is it possible to get types or aliases of all constructors of a class
in D2?
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Don wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:17:59 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley
wrote:
It's also insanely kludgy and ugly. Bleh.
Ugly, yes. Kludgy, I don't think so. It's only a syntax issue. The basic
concept of pa
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Don wrote:
By contrast, something like Nemerle macros are a kludge. The idea of
providing a 'hook' into the compiler is a horrible hack. It exposes all
kinds of compiler internals. Yes, it has nicer syntax.
Are you talking specifically abo
19 matches
Mail list logo
