Christopher Wright wrote:
> Ellery Newcomer wrote:
>> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Ellery Newcomer
>>> wrote:
This is probably a bad idea
>>> A single string mixin must consist of an entire, fully-formed
>>> statement, expression, or declaration (depending o
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Ellery Newcomer
wrote:
This is probably a bad idea
A single string mixin must consist of an entire, fully-formed
statement, expression, or declaration (depending on where it's used).
Case labels do not, on thei
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Ellery Newcomer
> wrote:
>> This is probably a bad idea
>
> A single string mixin must consist of an entire, fully-formed
> statement, expression, or declaration (depending on where it's used).
> Case labels do not, on their own, count
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Ellery Newcomer
wrote:
> This is probably a bad idea, but from my readings of the dmd source, I
> noticed some preprocessor defines that looked useful, along the lines of
>
> #define CASES case A:case B: (etc)
>
> I'd kinda like something similar in D, but a naive
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
This is probably a bad idea, but from my readings of the dmd source, I
noticed some preprocessor defines that looked useful, along the lines of
#define CASES case A:case B: (etc)
I'd kinda like something similar in D, but a naive attempt with mixins
doesn't work, e.g.
im
This is probably a bad idea, but from my readings of the dmd source, I
noticed some preprocessor defines that looked useful, along the lines of
#define CASES case A:case B: (etc)
I'd kinda like something similar in D, but a naive attempt with mixins
doesn't work, e.g.
immutable string cases = "c
On 10/10/2009 10:50, Don wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On 10/10/2009 00:36, Christopher Wright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On 09/10/2009 00:38, Christopher Wright wrote:
It makes macros highly compiler-specific, or requires the
compiler's AST
to be part of the language.
Nemerle took the nuclea
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On 10/10/2009 00:36, Christopher Wright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On 09/10/2009 00:38, Christopher Wright wrote:
It makes macros highly compiler-specific, or requires the compiler's
AST
to be part of the language.
Nemerle took the nuclear option, and its macros are all
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On 10/10/2009 00:36, Christopher Wright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On 09/10/2009 00:38, Christopher Wright wrote:
It makes macros highly compiler-specific, or requires the compiler's
AST
to be part of the language.
Nemerle took the nuclear option, and its macros are all
On 10/10/2009 00:36, Christopher Wright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On 09/10/2009 00:38, Christopher Wright wrote:
It makes macros highly compiler-specific, or requires the compiler's AST
to be part of the language.
Nemerle took the nuclear option, and its macros are all-powerful. That's
a rea
10 matches
Mail list logo
