On 4/3/10 07:03, strtr wrote:
What I probably mean to ask is :
In the code below, for what kind of i1 and i2 would the output be like this :
-
Same Value.
3 : 5B536C 59D020
3 : 59CE0C 59CEF0
5 : 5B536C 59D020
5 : 59CE0C 59CEF0
-
if( i1 !is null i2 !is null i2.value == i1.value
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
On 4/3/10 07:03, strtr wrote:
What I probably mean to ask is :
In the code below, for what kind of i1 and i2 would the output be like this
:
-
Same Value.
3 : 5B536C 59D020
3 : 59CE0C 59CEF0
5 : 5B536C 59D020
5 : 59CE0C 59CEF0
-
if( i1
BCS :
#1 is a bad idea as are almost all special case rules
Right, I was not looking for a special case.
#2 is just flat wrong 99.9% of the time.
I see. Then I will think if it's right to remove that bug report or not.
I have to ask. :) What does that code supposed to
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote in message
news:hp8jra$1ln...@digitalmars.com...
If you don't want that doplication you can also write:
enum auto f = Foo();
Can't you do:
enum f = Foo();
?
