On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:06:15 +, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:46:09 +, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm new to D2 ranges but have been following D for some time. I'm
>> posting here because I want to check if I'm doing anything wrong before
>> filing a bug.
>>
On Wednesday 13 October 2010 23:03:05 Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:53:51 +, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:25:15 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >> Okay. in the code that I'm working on at the moment, I get an exception
> >> saying that a cyclic de
Am 13.10.2010 15:50, schrieb BCS:
Hello Benjamin,
Am 08.10.2010 11:13, schrieb Lars T. Kyllingstad:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:33:22 +0200, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Hi, I'm writing a vec4 math struct and I have a method of which the
return value has to be a lvalue so I wonder which is the correct
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:53:51 +, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:25:15 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
>> Okay. in the code that I'm working on at the moment, I get an exception
>> saying that a cyclic dependency was detected but no information
>> whatsoever as to where it
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:25:15 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Okay. in the code that I'm working on at the moment, I get an exception
> saying that a cyclic dependency was detected but no information
> whatsoever as to where it is or what it means. I haven't been able to
> find much information on
Okay. in the code that I'm working on at the moment, I get an exception saying
that a cyclic dependency was detected but no information whatsoever as to where
it is or what it means. I haven't been able to find much information on them
other than some discussions of making it so that the compile
spir:
> Does this OO-like syntax also work with other parameter types?
No, it currently doesn't.
> Else, why not? I mean, also, why allow it for arrays?
It was originally a compiler bug relative to just arrays. Some people have
appreciated it, and it became a feature.
Some people have asked t
Hello,
(completely new to D and to the list)
I just read the following in the doc about arrays at
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/arrays.html:
=
If the first parameter to a function is an array, the function can be called as
if it were a property of the array:
int[] a
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:46:09 +, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm new to D2 ranges but have been following D for some time. I'm
> posting here because I want to check if I'm doing anything wrong before
> filing a bug.
>
> The code below is a test case I made after hitting the problem in real
%u wrote:
Perhaps. Is there a way to explain it to me? Do you mean the first x
elements will be objects, and the rest will be size_ts that are not
pointers?
Exactly that.
No. The GC only cares about whole blocks, not singular locations within
each. That said, there is a bug report with a GC
Hi,
I'm new to D2 ranges but have been following D for some time. I'm posting
here because I want to check if I'm doing anything wrong before filing a
bug.
The code below is a test case I made after hitting the problem in real
code. Basically the pyramid recursive function should print out:
[1,
Hello Benjamin,
Am 08.10.2010 11:13, schrieb Lars T. Kyllingstad:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:33:22 +0200, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Hi, I'm writing a vec4 math struct and I have a method of which the
return value has to be a lvalue so I wonder which is the correct way
to do this:
vec4 Normalize() c
== Quote from Simen kjaeraas (simen.kja...@gmail.com)'s article
> %u wrote:
> > == Quote from Simen kjaeraas (simen.kja...@gmail.com)'s article
> >> %u wrote:
> >> > How gc unfriendly is an union of objects and sizet_t?
> >> >
> >> > union{
> >> > size_t arr[10];
> >> > Class obj[10];
> >> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
