And it seems also Walter is meaning mebibytes:
enum size = (16*1024*1024)/int.sizeof;
static assert(!__traits(compiles, int[size]));
static assert(__traits(compiles, int[size-1]));
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:32:35 +0200, Aleksandar Ružičić
wrote:
Is it possible to use opDispatch as generic getter and setter at the
same time? Something like __get() and __set() in PHP..
this is what I've tried: https://gist.github.com/895571
and I get Error: template instance opDispatch!("b
dmd can compile and run to follow the code:
unittest
{
spawn(&fun);
}
void fun(int i) { writeln(i); }
Which if you are lucky segfaults and if you are unlucky prints
garbage! The problem is that spawn doesn't checks that the signature
of fun matches the number and type of variadic arguments. I
Ok that makes sense. Thank you.
On 2011-04-04 16:44, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 4/5/11, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Not to mention, in the case above, a null
> > character should automatically be appended onto the end of the string,
> > since it's as string literal.
>
> I've always found this confusing. So If I have this char
On 4/5/11, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Not to mention, in the case above, a null
> character should automatically be appended onto the end of the string, since
> it's as string literal.
I've always found this confusing. So If I have this char array:
char[] foostring = "foo".dup;
null is appended t
On 2011-04-04 16:17, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> I think I'd need a toWStringz function, or maybe toStringz can be made more
> clever and figure out that I'm passing a wstring and return a
> null-terminated wchar*.
>
> Currently I'm using wstrings and appending the null terminator by hand,
> e.g.:
>
I think I'd need a toWStringz function, or maybe toStringz can be made more
clever and figure out that I'm passing a wstring and return a null-terminated
wchar*.
Currently I'm using wstrings and appending the null terminator by hand, e.g.:
wstring appName = "DMapp" ~ "\0";
Some WinAPI functio
On 2011-04-04 06:37, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:45:51 -0400, bearophile
>
> wrote:
> > simendsjo:
> >> http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/arrays.html says static arrays are
> >> limited to 16mb, but I can only allocate 1mb.
> >> My fault, or bug?
> >
> > It accepts 4_000_000
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:30:34 -0400, simendsjo
wrote:
On 04.04.2011 15:53, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
2. The D GC collects entire memory blocks, not portions of them. There
is no way for the GC to "collect" a[3]. It can only collect the entire
memory block which contains a.
Given the above
On 04.04.2011 15:53, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 08:29:47 -0400, simendsjo
wrote:
D will copy the original content if a slice expands, but is the
following behavior
implementation specific, or part of the specification?
auto a = [0,1,2];
auto b = a[0..2];
a.length = 2; //
Hi Kai,
Thanks. Yes, I came to realize that myself. Since I didn't see a fork
in std.process, I assumed it was different from the POSIX semantics.
Thanks,
Tarun
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
> On 04/03/2011 07:31 AM, Tarun Ramakrishna wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Apparently std.pro
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:43:03 -0400, bearophile
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
That would be 16 MiB.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mebibyte
Then I think 16 MiB are more useful than 16_000_000 bytes.
Seems arbitrary to me. I'm sure some people feel 32MB would be more
useful.
-Steve
Steven Schveighoffer:
> That would be 16 MiB.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mebibyte
Then I think 16 MiB are more useful than 16_000_000 bytes.
Bye,
bearophile
On 04/03/2011 05:06 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2011-04-03 04:10, simendsjo wrote:
int[] a = [1,2,3];
int[4] b;
assert(b == [0,0,0,0]);
b = a[] * 3; // oops... a[] * 3 takes element outside a's bounds
assert(b[$-1] == 0); // fails.. last element is *(a
On 04/03/2011 07:31 AM, Tarun Ramakrishna wrote:
Hi,
Apparently std.process.exec (D2.052/windows) doesn't work the way the
documentation describes. It terminates the parent process. Is there a
way to keep the parent process open in D ? I also vaguely remember
seeing some mails on this list about
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 08:29:47 -0400, simendsjo
wrote:
D will copy the original content if a slice expands, but is the
following behavior
implementation specific, or part of the specification?
auto a = [0,1,2];
auto b = a[0..2];
a.length = 2; // is a[3] already marked
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:45:51 -0400, bearophile
wrote:
simendsjo:
http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/arrays.html says static arrays are
limited to 16mb, but I can only allocate 1mb.
My fault, or bug?
It accepts 4_000_000 ints, but not (16 * 1024 * 1024) / int.sizeof =
4_194_304 ints. I don't k
On 2011-04-04 03:11, simendsjo wrote:
> > What use case do you have for wanting to know whether a variable is an
> > enum or not?
>
> The same reason I'd like to check if it's const/immutable; if an algorithm
> requires a modifiable array.
>
> void sortInPlace(int[] array) {
> array.sort;
> }
> What use case do you have for wanting to know whether a variable is an enum
> or not?
The same reason I'd like to check if it's const/immutable; if an algorithm
requires a
modifiable array.
void sortInPlace(int[] array) {
array.sort;
}
void main() {
int[] a = [3,2,1];
sortInPlace
On 2011-04-04 01:16, simendsjo wrote:
> But there is a difference in how they behave, and I have no way of checking
> this behavior. Consider the following little snippet:
>
> void f(int[] a) {
> a[0] = -1;
> }
>
> void main() {
> int[] a = [1,2,3];
> static assert(is(typeof(a) == int
But there is a difference in how they behave, and I have no way of checking
this behavior.
Consider the following little snippet:
void f(int[] a) {
a[0] = -1;
}
void main() {
int[] a = [1,2,3];
static assert(is(typeof(a) == int[]));
f(a);
assert(a[0] == -1); // a passed by re
I reported the error to the author. Thanks guys!
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:34 AM, spir wrote:
> On 04/03/2011 09:38 AM, Jesus Alvarez wrote:
>
>> I got it to compile adding std.regex to split to make it:
>>
>> auto words = std.regex.split (sentence, regex("[ \t,.;:?]+"));
>>
>> So now my question
23 matches
Mail list logo
