On 4/7/2011 10:17 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Like the subject says. I try to use the makefile, but I keep getting this:
Error on line 76: expecting target : dependencies
It requires gnu make to run. You can look at the scripts used by the
auto-tester here:
On 08/04/2011 05:37, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Is the makefile supposed to work out-of-the-box, or is it expected that it
be edited first? Because when I do make -f win32.mak form the src dir I
just get Error: '\dm\bin\dmc' not found. Same (exact same) result if I do
make -f win32.mak
On 04/08/2011 03:00 PM, Aleksandar Ružičić wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:27 PM, spirdenis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
how are we supposed to insert code phrases in the
flow of normal text?
code/code tags should be used for that
(http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/text.html#h-9.2.1).
Right,
E.g. the WindowsAPI bindings have the wingdi.d file, which has this call at the
very top of the module:
pragma(lib, gdi32.lib);
This doesn't seem to put any gdi32.lib symbol references to the final winapi
library file, and if I try to use a function from wingdi.d from a main file, I
still
Ok so if I compile the Winapi .d modules with my main file, the pragma
statement is taken into account and I don't have to manually add the
pragma again.
But If I use an import switch (dmd -Iwin32\) and a precompiled
library, then the pragma statement is skipped. Could this be
considered a bug?
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:52 PM, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, but IIUC unlike pre there is no guarantee for code contents not
to be interpreted further. It's a semantic hint to the rendering engine
(which is often used to perform syntax highlighting).
AFAIK no major browser (A-grade
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:52 PM, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes:
Macros:
CODE = code$0/code
That's really nice! I might take a look at ddoc and try to write some
useful macros if it's expressive enough...
