Here is my prototype COM compile-time reflection based wrapper mixin
(which I have abandoned in favor of alias this since it covers 95% of my
use cases even though it isn't perfectly safe). I am new at D so you
have been warned, though this part of the language seems pretty
straightforward eno
Mariusz Gliwiński wrote:
I'll clarify myself:
All i would need is extending - without polymorphism.
Containment, can be solution for fields which doesn't annoys so much
(although image in auto-generated documentation, just like it's with
subclassing, would be nice).
Unfortunately, the worse case
> Firstly, thanks for comprehensive answer and I'd like to excuse for my
> stupid mistakes, which are caused by learning a lot and not actually
> programming.
>
> On date 2011-05-02 23:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Classes are reference types and are meant to be on the heap.
>
> Yeah, value vs
Firstly, thanks for comprehensive answer and I'd like to excuse for my
stupid mistakes, which are caused by learning a lot and not actually
programming.
On date 2011-05-02 23:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Classes are reference types and are meant to be on the heap.
Yeah, value vs reference sema
> What are the differences between class instantiated by scope and struct
> itself?
> Two, that comes to my mind are:
> - vtable existance (yep, struct with inheritation - that's what i like)
> - lol, i just forgot while writing this e-mail
First off, I would point out that scoped classes are goin
What are the differences between class instantiated by scope and struct
itself?
Two, that comes to my mind are:
- vtable existance (yep, struct with inheritation - that's what i like)
- lol, i just forgot while writing this e-mail
:)
Sincerely,
Mariusz Gliwiński
Mr enuhtac wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm new to D and this list (although I've had a look onto D a few years ago). I
hope you guys can help me with my questions.
At the moment I'm trying to implement some expression template stuff. My first
goal is to encode an expression into a type representin
Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 26.03.2011 11:03, Caligo wrote:
"In the expression a[, ...,], if $ occurs in, it is rewritten as a.opDollar!(i)()." -- TDPL, pg 380
Is that correct? if so, could some one give an example code? I don't
understand the need for the parameter.
Also, what is the signatu
Thanks, that post explained it. Obviously I wasn't the first and
likely won't be the last person to run into this. Maybe put's
documentation could make a note of this.
On Sun, 01 May 2011 09:30:34 -0400, CrypticMetaphor
wrote:
Hi, I've been away from D for a while, but now I'm back and I'm stuck
with an compile time error.
I've got a Matrix33 class and a Vector3 class, but something is wrong
with the way I return my Vector3 in my matrix class:
If I d
I was away.
Don:
> That would not fix this problem. You're doing arithmetic on unsigned
> values, where overflow doesn't happen.
My enhancement request about integral overflows asks for two compiler switches:
one that turns signed integral overflows (at compile time or run time) into
errors,
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:09:09 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> import std.range;
>
> void main()
> {
> int[] a = [1, 2, 3];
>
> a.put(6);
> assert(a == [2, 3]);
>
> a.put([1, 2]);
> assert(a.length == 0);
> }
>
> Seems kind of odd.. put is implemented as an append met
12 matches
Mail list logo