On 20/05/2011 04:19, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Foo.b.init is actually 0. Are the docs wrong, or is the compiler wrong? Let me
know so
I can fix the docs if necessary as I'm doing that now.
Known issue:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5715
Stewart.
"joe" wrote in message
news:ir8frr$ait$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> Second, from your own experience using D do think it would make a good or
> bad
> choice for a web development language?
I'd really say that a good choice for a web development language is whatever
you find to be a good choice
Yea, the Dynamic Web Rendering thread just went over this, so
shouldn't be hard to find that thread.
It went into discussing my method and got a little long, but the
summary is:
You can write web apps in D using the standard CGI interface or
a long lived process (embedded http server or whatever.
On 21/05/2011 09:58, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2011-05-21 01:04, Matthew Ong wrote:
Hi,
D has major potential to replace C/C++ at the system API level.
What I can see D is doing now is trying to glue to the existing C API
instead of replacing that OLD OLD language.
But it is too early to see
Have a look at the recent thread titled 'How To Dynamic Web Rendering?'
Adam Ruppe has created a package for web development with D and it seems
to work like a charm.
I currently do most of my web development in PHP, with some work in Ruby with
RoR. Right now I'm starting to think about building my own stack for web dev
(I already use my own MVC framework and libs in PHP), but I'd really like to
move to something faster and more powerful. Java or ASP.NET are two
Oh yeah cmd.exe doesn't really have that many font options. Personally
I use console2 from http://sourceforge.net/projects/console/ , which
has font options and nice things compared to cmd.exe. (It's really
just a GUI wrapper with some extras).
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 04:35 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Subversion handles multiple people editing the same file perfectly fine. But
> Hg probably is better than SVN, overall. I've been a happy SVN user for a
> long time, but even I'm starting to get won over by Hg. Of course, some
On 5/21/2011 5:12 PM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2011 10:54:54 +0200, Matthew Ong wrote:
mixin template AType(alias T, U, alias V){
class T : ClassC { // Class level Template
This gives you a class called T. You seem to want it to have the name
you pass as a string, in which case y
On Sat, 21 May 2011 05:12:20 +0200, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Taken from the docs:
alias int func(int);
void main()
{
if ( is(func[]) ) // not satisfied because arrays of
writeln("satisfied");// functions are not allowed
else
writeln("not satisfied");
}
On Sat, 21 May 2011 10:54:54 +0200, Matthew Ong wrote:
mixin template AType(alias T, U, alias V){
class T : ClassC { // Class level Template
This gives you a class called T. You seem to want it to have the name
you pass as a string, in which case you have to use string mixins.
private:
On 2011-05-21 01:04, Matthew Ong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> D has major potential to replace C/C++ at the system API level.
> What I can see D is doing now is trying to glue to the existing C API
> instead of replacing that OLD OLD language.
>
> But it is too early to see if that is the case at the Busines
Hi,
As the documentation at D ONLY shows template at functions level and
also ONLY the content of a class but without the definition of a class.
Could this code be working? Or did I miss out some syntax.
mixin template AType(alias T, U, alias V){
class T : ClassC { // Class level Template
priv
"Matthew Ong" wrote in message
news:ir7qio$28mn$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 5/20/2011 4:23 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Matthew Ong" wrote in message
>> news:ir3801$84b$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>>
>>> As for the real reason it is for:
>>> That current D layout seem to limit that one file to a
Hi,
D has major potential to replace C/C++ at the system API level.
What I can see D is doing now is trying to glue to the existing C API
instead of replacing that OLD OLD language.
But it is too early to see if that is the case at the Business
Application level to replace enterprise level reso
On 5/20/2011 4:23 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Matthew Ong" wrote in message
news:ir3801$84b$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 5/14/2011 3:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Jason House" wrote in message
But yea, one-class-per-file is really a Java thing (and then a few other
Not true entirely, the
On 5/21/2011 2:46 PM, Matthew Ong wrote:
On 5/20/2011 2:55 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 22:37 +0200, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
[ . . . ]
You would also need a Unicode-aware font, maybe Lucida or something
similar. Typically fixed-point fonts used for programming have little
suppo
17 matches
Mail list logo