Hi,
I've create a little example of my problem:
module example;
class ExampleClass {
public {
int mi;
this(int i) {
mi = i;
}
}
}
int main(string[] args) {
ExampleClass[hash_t] exp;
On 08/19/2011 02:01 PM, useo6 wrote:
Hi,
I've create a little example of my problem:
module example;
class ExampleClass {
public {
int mi;
this(int i) {
mi = i;
}
}
}
int main(string[] args) {
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 06:47:32 -0400, nrgyzer nrgy...@gmail.com wrote:
== Auszug aus Robert Clipsham (rob...@octarineparrot.com)'s Artikel
On 16/08/2011 20:17, nrgyzer wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've the following:
private static ubyte[][2][hash_t] classInstances;
this() {
== Auszug aus Timon Gehr (timon.g...@gmx.ch)'s Artikel
On 08/19/2011 02:01 PM, useo6 wrote:
Hi,
I've create a little example of my problem:
module example;
class ExampleClass {
public {
int mi;
this(int i) {
mi = i;
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 01:29:05 -0400, Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 29.07.2011, 17:23 Uhr, schrieb Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:50:52 -0400, bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
For example, D needs to call all
Is this all correct?
static import core.stdc.stdio;
static import std.stdio;
void main() {
std.stdio.fprintf(core.stdc.stdio.stderr, Error\n); // OK
std.stdio.fprintf(std.stdio.stderr, Error\n); // line 5, error
}
The latest DMD gives:
test.d(5): Error: function core.stdc.stdio.fprintf
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:12:11 -0400, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Is this all correct?
static import core.stdc.stdio;
static import std.stdio;
void main() {
std.stdio.fprintf(core.stdc.stdio.stderr, Error\n); // OK
std.stdio.fprintf(std.stdio.stderr, Error\n); // line
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6531
On 8/19/11 4:12 PM, bearophile wrote:
static import core.stdc.stdio;
static import std.stdio;
void main() {
std.stdio.fprintf(core.stdc.stdio.stderr, Error\n); // OK
std.stdio.fprintf(std.stdio.stderr, Error\n); // line 5, error
}
std.stdio.stderr is a wrapper around
I'm really getting confused as to how import libraries actually work.
Someone once told me that in order to use an import library one has to write
d files declaring the functions so that the dmd compiler knows what's in the
lib files.
I've never thought any further untill I compiled the gtkd
== Auszug aus Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s Artikel
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 06:47:32 -0400, nrgyzer nrgy...@gmail.com
wrote:
== Auszug aus Robert Clipsham (rob...@octarineparrot.com)'s
Artikel
On 16/08/2011 20:17, nrgyzer wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've the following:
maarten van damme Wrote:
the compiler flags I needed to add was -I for every src directory and -L for
the lib file. The problem with that was that those files in the src dir
don't declare the functions but also define them. They are the real source
code files so I didn't understand why the -L
You don't need the damn -L flag, just pass the .lib file directly and
DMD will pass it to the linker.
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:38:01 -0400, Jesse Phillips wrote:
If you wanted (and didn't run out of command line characters) you could
list all .d files in every library you are using and have dmd compile
everything for you. Then the -L would not be required.
Just a reminder, you have dmd @cmdfile
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:38:01 -0400, Jesse Phillips wrote:
If you wanted (and didn't run out of command line characters) you could
list all .d files in every library you are using and have dmd compile
everything for you. Then the -L would not be required.
Just a reminder, you have dmd @cmdfile
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:38:01 -0400, Jesse Phillips wrote:
If you wanted (and didn't run out of command line characters) you could
list all .d files in every library you are using and have dmd compile
everything for you. Then the -L would not be required.
Just a reminder, you have dmd @cmdfile
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:38:01 -0400, Jesse Phillips wrote:
If you wanted (and didn't run out of command line characters) you could
list all .d files in every library you are using and have dmd compile
everything for you. Then the -L would not be required.
Just a reminder, you have dmd @cmdfile
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:38:01 -0400, Jesse Phillips wrote:
If you wanted (and didn't run out of command line characters) you could
list all .d files in every library you are using and have dmd compile
everything for you. Then the -L would not be required.
Just a reminder, you have dmd @cmdfile
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Jesse Phillips
jessekphillip...@gmail.comwrote:
maarten van damme Wrote:
the compiler flags I needed to add was -I for every src directory and -L
for
the lib file. The problem with that was that those files in the src dir
don't declare the functions but
and how come the executable I manually linked was 17 times smaller then the
other executable?
and how does the dll searching works?
I saw the same with another user using the web interface, seems like it's
buggy
2011/8/19 Graham Fawcett fawc...@uwindsor.ca
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:35:00 +, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:38:01 -0400, Jesse Phillips wrote:
If you wanted (and didn't run out of command
Graham Fawcett Wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:38:01 -0400, Jesse Phillips wrote:
If you wanted (and didn't run out of command line characters) you could
list all .d files in every library you are using and have dmd compile
everything for you. Then the -L would not be required.
Just a
so I have installed ldc,gdc and dmd on my linux box(debian testing)
the problem now is that when I try to compiler something using gdc or ldc
that imports from core it gives an error (core.* can not be found).
the versions of phobos between the 3 are completely out of sync, did I
install it the
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 03:37:52 +0200, maarten van damme wrote:
so I have installed ldc,gdc and dmd on my linux box(debian testing) the
problem now is that when I try to compiler something using gdc or ldc
that imports from core it gives an error (core.* can not be found). the
versions of phobos
ooh, thank you :)
2011/8/20 Jesse Phillips jessekphillip...@gmail.com
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 03:37:52 +0200, maarten van damme wrote:
so I have installed ldc,gdc and dmd on my linux box(debian testing) the
problem now is that when I try to compiler something using gdc or ldc
that imports
25 matches
Mail list logo
