Timon Gehr:
> according to TDPL p53., that fact is defined. (unary minus: -x == ~x+1)
Uh.
Bye,
bearophile
On 09/02/2011 12:09 AM, Damian Ziemba wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:59:29 +0200, Timon Gehr wrote:
static assert(isInputRange!Test);
static assert(isInputRange!Test2);
toString is not shadowed, but the implementation of writeln assumes that
your types are an InputRange (they provide, by the me
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:59:29 +0200, Timon Gehr wrote:
> static assert(isInputRange!Test);
> static assert(isInputRange!Test2);
>
> toString is not shadowed, but the implementation of writeln assumes that
> your types are an InputRange (they provide, by the means of opDispatch,
> front(), empty()
== Quote from Timon Gehr (timon.g...@gmx.ch)'s article
> On 09/01/2011 06:20 PM, Sean Eskapp wrote:
> > Is integer overflow defined (for instance, as being mod 2^size)?
> I am quite sure that all operations are defined as operations on two's
> complement integers, which would mean overflow is defin
%u wrote:
> I have 2 issue:
> 1- i can't install the package, there is problem I don't know what is it?
What is the error?
> 2-it is not updated.
It is not flagged out of date either. AFAIK it should compile and
since it downloads the latest source from Mercurial, there is no
need
On 09/01/2011 06:20 PM, Sean Eskapp wrote:
Is integer overflow defined (for instance, as being mod 2^size)?
I am quite sure that all operations are defined as operations on two's
complement integers, which would mean overflow is defined, but I cannot
find the respective part of the specificat
Is integer overflow defined (for instance, as being mod 2^size)? Can I
reliably say that -long.min == 0L?
On 01-09-2011 08:35, %u wrote:
I have 2 issue:
1- i can't install the package, there is problem I don't know what is it?
2-it is not updated.
It would probably help to post the error...
- Alex
On 09/01/2011 10:23 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
It might well be that I'm missing something obvious in the emplace()
overload jungle, but what is the reason for std.range.zip to use
std.conv.emplace for assigning the range elements to the »output«
elements instead of just using the assignment oper
On 09/01/2011 09:34 AM, Damian Ziemba wrote:
Greetings.
I've been playing around with opDispatch and toString methods and I found
strange behavior.
Example:
import std.stdio;
struct Test
{
string opDispatch( string key )()
{
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:56:49 +, Christophe wrote:
> Try to create the method:
>
> const void toString(void delegate(const(char)[]) sink, string
> formatString) {
> sink(toString());
> }
Adding it as it is results in compiler error:
./quick.d(30): Error: function quick.Test2.toStrin
It might well be that I'm missing something obvious in the emplace()
overload jungle, but what is the reason for std.range.zip to use
std.conv.emplace for assigning the range elements to the »output«
elements instead of just using the assignment operator?
https://github.com/D-Programming-Langu
Try to create the method:
const void toString(void delegate(const(char)[]) sink, string formatString)
{
sink(toString());
}
Greetings.
I've been playing around with opDispatch and toString methods and I found
strange behavior.
Example:
import std.stdio;
struct Test
{
string opDispatch( string key )()
{
return "I am dispatching in struct
14 matches
Mail list logo
