"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.v3h06olweav7ka@localhost.localdomain...
>
> That sounds like an incorrect restriction. The implicit cast to immutable
> should depend on whether the function being *called* qualifies, not if the
> function you are calling *from* qualifies.
>
I t
Am 04.09.2011, 19:01 Uhr, schrieb Christian Köstlin
:
On 9/3/11 7:53 , dennis luehring wrote:
Am 26.08.2011 19:43, schrieb Christian Köstlin:
Hi guys,
i started the thread:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7202710/fastest-way-of-reading-bytes-in-d2
on stackoverflow, because i ran into k
I have just finished reading Alexandrescu's The D Programming Language, but it
doesn't seem to talk at all about how to use D as a stand-in for C/C++ almost at
all. E.g., the part of D that doesn't depend on a runtime or garbage collector.
It's not that I have anything against those niceties---it
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:09:46 +0200, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 07:14 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:18:46 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>> IIRC, old was rejected because it added extra complication for little
>>> value.
>>
>> Yes, there were technical difficulties in mak
On 2011-10-17 16:01, Andrea Fontana wrote:
I handle request on different threads. I do some pre-processing on
scgi data and I fill a struct:
request.get[]
request.post[]
request.cookie[]
request.headers[string]
then I call a virtual function (to override on subclasses) like:
do(request, output
Timon Gehr:
> I agree. It is odd that we have opSliceUnary but not opSliceBinary.
If you think something useful is missing, then file a Bugzilla enhancement
request.
Bye,
bearophile
On 10/15/2011 01:12 AM, Jay Norwood wrote:
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
On Friday, October 14, 2011 15:29:17 Jay Norwood wrote:
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
On Friday, October 14, 2011 11:30:25 Jay Norwood wrote:
Is it possible to overload array operations
Please be more specific. Are you asking whe
On 10/14/2011 09:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, October 14, 2011 15:29:17 Jay Norwood wrote:
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
On Friday, October 14, 2011 11:30:25 Jay Norwood wrote:
Is it possible to overload array operations
Please be more specific. Are you asking whether a struct or clas
On 10/17/2011 08:04 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, October 17, 2011 00:29:30 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 10/16/2011 07:31 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, October 16, 2011 19:13:09 Timon Gehr wrote:
I don't agree that 'old' is very difficult to implement. Just evaluate
what is inside th
On 17-10-2011 07:59, Davidson Corry wrote:
On 10/16/2011 9:35 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 17-10-2011 02:43, bearophile wrote:
Timon Gehr:
Eiffel does not do that either.
(even though it _does_ have a built in deep copy feature)
We don't have to over-engineer the feature, if somebody ne
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:24:26 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 10/13/2011 01:46 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:57:09 -0400, Cheng Wei
wrote:
== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:46:57 -0400, Trass3r wrote:
>> I belie
I handle request on different threads. I do some pre-processing on
scgi data and I fill a struct:
request.get[]
request.post[]
request.cookie[]
request.headers[string]
then I call a virtual function (to override on subclasses) like:
do(request, output);
where user fill output struct in a way li
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:05:43 -0400, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
The implicit conversion to immutable is only possible inside strongly
pure
functions. When the parameter is 'in int[]' foo cannot be strongly pure,
only const pure. As 'in int[2]' is a value type, the second foo can be
strongly pure
Nice trick ! However, in D, you have scope(exit) scope(success) and
scope(failure) to do similar stuffs.
I personally use both, on a case by case basis.
Le 17/10/2011 06:47, Steve Teale a écrit :
Is not needed because structs are inherently scope.
I'm sure experienced D programmers do this al
In addition, I would like to mention this confrence by Andrei
Alexandrescu : http://blip.tv/boostcon/boostcon-2009-keynote-2452140
Le 17/10/2011 04:55, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
On Monday, October 17, 2011 10:22:42 Granville Barnett wrote:
Hi All,
I've not used D for long so hopefully this q
On 2011-10-17 10:14, Andrea Fontana wrote:
I'm working on a SCGI implementation for my job. SCGI is quite easy to
handle and well-supported by servers.
The only missing part is multipart POST (used for file post).
get, post, cookie, headers (etc..) just work.
I have to ask permission to publish
I'm working on a SCGI implementation for my job. SCGI is quite easy to
handle and well-supported by servers.
The only missing part is multipart POST (used for file post).
get, post, cookie, headers (etc..) just work.
I have to ask permission to publish my code, btw it's a very easy
protocol to
17 matches
Mail list logo
