On 11/16/2011 11:39 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
I think this is a better solution:
void foo2(T: ParameterTypeTuple!foo[0])(T t){foo(t);}
Then it is just a matter of applying proper value range propagation for
IFTY:
void bar(T: short)(T t){...}
void main(){
bar(1); // ok
}
BTW, this already works
On 11/16/2011 10:56 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:16:48 -0500, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 11/16/2011 09:00 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:26:57 -0500, Timon Gehr
wrote:
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:16:48 -0500, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 11/16/2011 09:00 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:26:57 -0500, Timon Gehr
wrote:
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45:02 -0500, Timon Gehr
wrote:
Note that this is a
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:47:58 -0500, Simen Kjærås
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:00:16 +0100, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:26:57 -0500, Timon Gehr
wrote:
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45:02 -0500, Timon Gehr
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:00:16 +0100, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:26:57 -0500, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45:02 -0500, Timon Gehr
wrote:
Note that this is an explicit allocation:
int[] a = [1,2,3]
On 11/16/2011 09:00 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:26:57 -0500, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45:02 -0500, Timon Gehr
wrote:
Note that this is an explicit allocation:
int[] a = [1,2,3]; // just as expli
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:00:16 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
The one case which is difficult to do is initializing a fixed-size array
with a literal that uses runtime data. I suppose we'd need a function
that returns a fixed-sized array made of its arguments, and doing the
init build
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:26:57 -0500, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45:02 -0500, Timon Gehr
wrote:
Note that this is an explicit allocation:
int[] a = [1,2,3]; // just as explicit as a NewExpression
Only the enums "hide" it so
On 11/16/2011 08:26 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
auto a = [new Foo, new Bar, new Qux]; // I want that to work.
(It currently does, if that was unclear)
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45:02 -0500, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 11/15/2011 04:53 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Yes, but this is spelled out because copying a static array requires
moving data. However, this does *not* require a hidden allocatio
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45:02 -0500, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 11/15/2011 04:53 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Yes, but this is spelled out because copying a static array requires
moving data. However, this does *not* require a hidden allocation (even
though it does do a hidden allocation current
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 08:33:04 Dejan Lekic wrote:
> RenatoL wrote:
> > ##[3] arr = [0, "aa", 2.4];
> >
> > What can i put instead of ##?
> >
> > In C#, just for example, i can write:
> >
> > object[] ar1 = new object[3];
> > ar1[0] = 1;
> > ar1[1] = "hello";
> > ar1[2] = 'a';
> >
> >
RenatoL wrote:
> ##[3] arr = [0, "aa", 2.4];
>
> What can i put instead of ##?
>
> In C#, just for example, i can write:
>
> object[] ar1 = new object[3];
> ar1[0] = 1;
> ar1[1] = "hello";
> ar1[2] = 'a';
>
> and it works. But in D
>
> Object[3] arr0 = [0, "aa", 2.4];
>
> and compiler compl
13 matches
Mail list logo
