On 18/01/12 04:36, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 02:33:25 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
And I cannot figure why :-(
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1528
As a workaround, templatize the last function by changing its signature to
int[] find()(int[] longer, int[]
On 01/18/2012 04:40 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
So, I was quite impressed with D's pureness system, and was
experimenting a bit with it. Then I discovered that delegates are
impure, which seems reasonable since there's no way to know what a
delegate might do. But *if* the compiler verifies that a parti
On 01/18/2012 02:32 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 18/01/12 04:36, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 02:33:25 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
And I cannot figure why :-(
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1528
As a workaround, templatize the last function by changing its
On 01/18/2012 04:57 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/18/2012 02:32 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 18/01/12 04:36, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 02:33:25 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
And I cannot figure why :-(
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1528
As a workaround, te
On 18/01/12 17:07, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/18/2012 04:57 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/18/2012 02:32 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 18/01/12 04:36, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 02:33:25 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
And I cannot figure why :-(
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/s
On 01/18/2012 05:40 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 18/01/12 17:07, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/18/2012 04:57 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/18/2012 02:32 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 18/01/12 04:36, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 02:33:25 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
And I cannot fi
I'm currently finishing std.uuid (see
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?ReviewQueue ). For name based hashes, a
name string is passed to a hash function and I need to make sure that the
resulting hash is the same on both little endian and big endian systems. So
what's needed to convert a strin
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 20:40:33 Johannes Pfau wrote:
> I'm currently finishing std.uuid (see
> http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?ReviewQueue ). For name based hashes, a
> name string is passed to a hash function and I need to make sure that the
> resulting hash is the same on both little e
On 18/01/12 18:05, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/18/2012 05:40 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 18/01/12 17:07, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/18/2012 04:57 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/18/2012 02:32 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 18/01/12 04:36, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 02:33:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 20:40:33 Johannes Pfau wrote:
>> I'm currently finishing std.uuid (see
>> http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?ReviewQueue ). For name based hashes,
>> a name string is passed to a hash function and I need to make sure that
>> the resulting ha
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:06, bearophile wrote:
>> template ID(alias a){alias a ID;}
>> void main(){
>> alias ID!(x => x ^^ 2) sqrTemplate;
>> }
>
> Thank you Timon, you are often good :-)
> I'll add it as enhancement request.
This limitation (not being able to alias a lambda) is quite irk
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 21:35:44 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Thanks for the precision. So I will move to the next section and come back
> to this part when the compiler is fix: I guess it will be fixed for the
> next release as it sounds as an important bug.
I don't know. It's been a bug for a l
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 21:42:51 Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Section 4.1.2. indeed says that it uses big endian. However, I should still
> be able to use a ubyte[16] representation and just make sure that those
> bytes are equal to the big endian representation. Thinking
Philippe Sigaud:
> This limitation (not being able to alias a lambda) is quite irksome.
> If you do an enhancement request, could you also add one for:
>
> alias __traits(whatever, whatever) some Result;
>
> Right now, the alias grammar doesn't allow this and I find this
> limitation jarring.
I
H. S. Teoh:
> But since this is apparently not yet implemented, just what *is*
> implemented currently when you specify 'pure'? Common subexpression
> factorization? Hoisting? Not (yet) memoization, apparently.
Common subexpression factorization for strongly pure functions that return
integral
15 matches
Mail list logo
