On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:37:45 -0700
Brad Anderson wrote:
> This is a very helpful post, Jonathan. I think the documentation
> could do with a "Changes and additions since TDPL" section with stuff
> like this so users aren't surprised. Users could easily mistake
> changes for bugs without these b
The only issue I have with this is the isAssociativeArray constraint.
That template uses __traits(isAssociativeArray, T), which returns
FALSE for DCollection's HashMap type. It would be a shame if you
couldn't define a drop-in replacement to builtin hashes with your own
implementation, seeing as su
But I did implement them poorly, this is better:
import std.traits;
template KeyType(AA)
if (isAssociativeArray!AA)
{
static if (is(AA V : V[K], K))
{
alias K KeyType;
}
}
template ValueType(AA)
if (isAssociativeArray!AA)
{
static if (is(AA V : V[U], U))
{
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.659.1327175391.16222.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
> It's partially available. It just isn't fully implemented, and I don't
> know
> what's missing from it. And I have no idea when it will be fully
> implemented.
> You can certainly use it
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.659.1327175391.16222.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
>
> It's partially available. It just isn't fully implemented, and I don't
> know
> what's missing from it. And I have no idea when it will be fully
> implemented.
> You can certainly use
alias double Real;
//alias float Real;
// simple linear interpolation; I partitioned the internals to help me
figure out what was happening.
Real lerp(Real t, Real a, Real b){
Real s1 = (1.0 - t) * a;
Real s2 = t * b;
Real rt1 = s1 + s2;
Real rt2 = ((1.0 - t) * a) + (t * b);
writefln("t=
On 1/23/2012 11:29 AM, Mars wrote:
On Sunday, 22 January 2012 at 23:23:23 UTC, Kapps wrote:
2) Create the binding functions using extern(System).
Oh man... that was the problem. The file I used was using extern(C).
Thought that was okay, it's a C lib after all. Thank you!
Mars
A number of l
Andrej Mitrovic:
> I haven't found these in Phobos, so if they're really not in
> std.traits or anywhere do you think I should make a pull request for
> this?
They are useful.
Bye,
bearophile
On 01/23/2012 04:04 PM, Mars wrote:
On Monday, 23 January 2012 at 22:48:02 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
If it makes sense, you can use version(x) blocks within the single
enum definition, as opposed to putting version(x) outside.
Could you give me an example, what that would look like? So far I
coul
On Monday, 23 January 2012 at 22:48:02 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
If it makes sense, you can use version(x) blocks within the
single enum definition, as opposed to putting version(x)
outside.
Could you give me an example, what that would look like? So far I
couldn't find a way to use version insid
On 01/23/2012 03:27 PM, Matt Soucy wrote:
> On 01/23/2012 04:28 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 01/23/2012 12:32 PM, Matt Soucy wrote:
>>> So I was messing around with some code I've been writing recently,
and I
>>> wanted to use a foreach on a struct as if it were an associative array.
>>
>> bearo
On 01/23/2012 04:28 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 01/23/2012 12:32 PM, Matt Soucy wrote:
So I was messing around with some code I've been writing recently, and I
wanted to use a foreach on a struct as if it were an associative array.
bearophile and I had replied to your earlier post.
Ali
Eek, I'm
On 01/23/2012 02:38 PM, Mars wrote:
Hello everybody.
I'd like to know if there's a way, to extend an Enum, based on version().
I have an Enum, that holds various values, but some are different, in
other versions. So the alternative would be to define the Enum several
times.
version(x)
{
enum ex
I haven't found these in Phobos, so if they're really not in
std.traits or anywhere do you think I should make a pull request for
this?
import std.traits;
template KeyType(T)
if (isAssociativeArray!T)
{
alias typeof(T.keys()[0]) KeyType;
}
template ValueType(T)
if (isAssociativeArray
Hello everybody.
I'd like to know if there's a way, to extend an Enum, based on
version().
I have an Enum, that holds various values, but some are
different, in other versions. So the alternative would be to
define the Enum several times.
version(x)
{
enum example
{
FOO = 1,
BAR = 2,
}
}
e
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 01:26:44PM -0800, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 01/23/2012 01:16 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> > struct Test {
> > int opApply(int delegate(ref int) dg) {
> > auto ret = 0;
> > for (auto i=0; ret==0&& i<5; i++) {
> >
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 01:16:29PM -0800, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 03:32:07PM -0500, Matt Soucy wrote:
> > So I was messing around with some code I've been writing recently,
> > and I wanted to use a foreach on a struct as if it were an
> > associative array. The problem is, I ca
On 01/23/2012 12:32 PM, Matt Soucy wrote:
So I was messing around with some code I've been writing recently, and I
wanted to use a foreach on a struct as if it were an associative array.
bearophile and I had replied to your earlier post.
Ali
On 01/23/2012 01:16 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 03:32:07PM -0500, Matt Soucy wrote:
>> So I was messing around with some code I've been writing recently,
>> and I wanted to use a foreach on a struct as if it were an
>> associative array. The problem is, I can't find any informa
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 03:32:07PM -0500, Matt Soucy wrote:
> So I was messing around with some code I've been writing recently,
> and I wanted to use a foreach on a struct as if it were an
> associative array. The problem is, I can't find any information on
> how to do that.
[...]
> I don't see an
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Saturday, January 21, 2012 09:11:52 Gour wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I'd like to re-start learning D (from scratch) using TDPL.
> >
> > However, several times I've encountered some message which says that
> > there are some problems in le
So I was messing around with some code I've been writing recently, and I
wanted to use a foreach on a struct as if it were an associative array.
The problem is, I can't find any information on how to do that.
I can't use something like "alias this", because the class I'm writing
acts as a wrappe
On 01/23/2012 08:01 PM, Xan xan wrote:
Hi.
Is there any actors library in D. Spawn and etc is ok, but I want more
high-level thing and actors it's the best I get, I think.
I searched and nothing.
I'm interested in D 2.0 or 1.0. Whatever!
Thanks in advace,
Xan.
std.concurrency is an actors li
Hi.
Is there any actors library in D. Spawn and etc is ok, but I want more
high-level thing and actors it's the best I get, I think.
I searched and nothing.
I'm interested in D 2.0 or 1.0. Whatever!
Thanks in advace,
Xan.
On Monday, January 23, 2012 19:48:02 Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 01/23/2012 07:06 PM, bearophile wrote:
> > Ellery Newcomer:
> >> void main(){
> >>
> >> for ({int x=0; short y=0;} x< 10; x++, y++){
> >> }
> >>
> >> }
> >
> > I don't understand, is that a compiler bug?
> > Aren't x and y in a sub-scop
On 01/23/2012 07:06 PM, bearophile wrote:
Ellery Newcomer:
void main(){
for ({int x=0; short y=0;} x< 10; x++, y++){
}
}
I don't understand, is that a compiler bug?
Aren't x and y in a sub-scope that ends before you use x and y?
Bye,
bearophile
It is not a bug.
ForSta
23.01.2012 20:06, bearophile пишет:
Ellery Newcomer:
void main(){
for ({int x=0; short y=0;} x< 10; x++, y++){
}
}
I don't understand, is that a compiler bug?
Aren't x and y in a sub-scope that ends before you use x and y?
Bye,
bearophile
According to specs, this is Bloc
Ellery Newcomer:
> void main(){
> for ({int x=0; short y=0;} x < 10; x++, y++){
> }
> }
I don't understand, is that a compiler bug?
Aren't x and y in a sub-scope that ends before you use x and y?
Bye,
bearophile
void main(){
for ({int x=0; short y=0;} x < 10; x++, y++){
}
}
wtf?
On 01/22/2012 11:37 AM, Zachary Lund wrote:
This is an ugly solution (and I'm not 100% sure it's valid D) but:
/+/
void main() {
{
short y = 0;
int x = 0;
for (; x < 10; ++x, ++y)
{
}
}
}
/+/
raise you.
void main(){
for ({int
30 matches
Mail list logo
