Yes, right, thank you, why reinventing the wheel when the std does the
things you want :)
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> Have you looked at std.variant? It sounds like what you're looking for.
>
>
On 01/25/2012 01:12 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/24/2012 10:28 PM, %u wrote:
Shouldn't this go into 'digitalmars.D' ?
It should go straight to the bug tracker.
Issue 7391 - floating wtf dmd 2.057 64
On 01/28/2012 04:56 PM, sclytrack wrote:
On 01/25/2012 01:12 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/24/2012 10:28 PM, %u wrote:
Shouldn't this go into 'digitalmars.D' ?
It should go straight to the bug tracker.
Issue 7391 - floating wtf dmd 2.057 64
Thanks!
On 01/28/12 03:02, Sparse Push wrote:
> What is the best way to generate GObject bindings?
> I ask this because I would like to use Clutter
> (http://www.clutter-project.org/) in my D program and I don't think it has D
> bindings already.
>From the website, http://www.clutter-project.org/about :
I've already reported, and it's been fixed in the latest:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7376
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:56 AM, sclytrack wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 01:12 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
>>
>> On 01/24/2012 10:28 PM, %u wrote:
>>>
>>> Shouldn't this go into 'digitalmars.D' ?
>>
I tried creating a D DLL which I use in a D application and followed the
steps in the DLL Howto on the homepage. Everything worked out fine so
far but when I actually try to use a module thats defined within the dll
and import it I get a linker error:
Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D6thBase6form
Now I've waisted Walter's precious time.
I feel so sad now :-(
On 01/28/2012 07:49 PM, Caligo wrote:
I've already reported, and it's been fixed in the latest:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7376
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:56 AM, sclytrack wrote:
On 01/25/2012 01:12 AM, Tim
Hello everybody.
So I heard that `delete' is being deprecated?
If that's true, what can I do to close an MmFile?
Or is there another way to create an MmFile object, other than with `new', so
that it gets destroyed when out of scope?
My problem is, I need to reopen the same file outside an if() bl
"NewName" wrote in message
news:jg2du7$2nun$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Hello everybody.
> So I heard that `delete' is being deprecated?
>
When delete is gone, you will still be able to destroy class instances with
'clear' from phobos. Like delete, it runs the destructor on the class, it
just d
Thanks Daniel.
So clear() is a function thing, so my delete mmf; will look like clear(mmf); am
I
right?
Yes. clear is in object.d so it will always be available.
"NewName" wrote in message
news:jg2fdj$2rmk$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Thanks Daniel.
> So clear() is a function thing, so my delete mmf; will look like
> clear(mmf); am I
> right?
>
== Quote from Artur Skawina (art.08...@gmail.com)'s article
> On 01/28/12 03:02, Sparse Push wrote:
> > What is the best way to generate GObject bindings?
> > I ask this because I would like to use Clutter
> > (http://www.clutter-project.org/) in my D program and I don't think it has D
> > bindings
It there any support for the extended ascii characters? (128-255). I
understand unicode is important, however working with some data and programs
that don't support those, I am getting a problem that the program causes an
exception because it isn't valid utf-8. Do I have to handle it all as
by
On Saturday, January 28, 2012 20:54:30 Era Scarecrow wrote:
> It there any support for the extended ascii characters? (128-255). I
> understand unicode is important, however working with some data and
> programs that don't support those, I am getting a problem that the program
> causes an exceptio
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 2:04 PM, sclytrack wrote:
>
>
> Now I've waisted Walter's precious time.
> I feel so sad now :-(
>
I should have made a post about the fact that I had already bug
reported it, but I forgot. Sorry.
Maybe someone's brought this up, but i seem to have the compiler complaining
to me that my function isn't 'pure' by calling a non-pure function,
specifically to!string().
However the unpure functions are only accessed in the contracts, and only if
it failed seriously. Is this already planned
> char is UTF-8 by definition, and D code is free to assume
> that that's the case.
> A lot of the string processing code in Phobos will throw if
> you give it ill-
> formed unicode.
>
> Now, you can put whatever you want in a char, but don't
> expect other D code to
> handle it correctly.
>
>
The way to avoid purity checking is to put code in a debug {} statement.
I'm not aware of any plans to disable purity checking for contracts.
Prior to filing the bug I tried to compile dmd from source.
I have now succeeded. The only problem I had was a missing
symbolic link libstdc++.so and this in Ubuntu 11.10. So
I just created it.
/usr/lib32/libstdc++.so -> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
Then "make -f posix" and in the dmd
19 matches
Mail list logo
