On 5/21/2012 6:32 AM, jerro wrote:
On Sunday, 20 May 2012 at 21:19:14 UTC, p0xel wrote:
This seems to work when the class is in the same file as main(), but
if I move it to it's own file and use "import foo" it errors. What am
I missing?
When you write "import foo;" and then foo.bar, the compi
On Sunday, 20 May 2012 at 06:57:20 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
On Saturday, 19 May 2012 at 18:17:16 UTC, Matthias Walter wrote:
On 2012-05-19 15:28, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Matthias Walter
wrote:
I would open a bug report with the following code which is a
bit sma
On Sunday, 20 May 2012 at 15:48:31 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 19/05/2012 16:13, maarten van damme wrote:
Yes, that's a common optimisation. Faster still would be to
test 6k-1 and 6k+1 for each positive integer k. Indeed, I've
done more than this in my time: hard-coded all the primes up to
On 20-05-2012 22:13, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-20 18:25, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Seems like I misunderstood what you were saying. Right, the C runtime on
*Windows* is closed source. But, I don't know why you think that
function is called by the C runtime; see src/rt/dmain2.d.
Have a
On Sunday, 20 May 2012 at 04:09:50 UTC, japplegame wrote:
public:
void startLogger(LogConstructorArgs args) {
loggerTid = spawn(&loggerThread, args);
}
void log(string msg, OtherOptions oo) {
loggerTid.send(LogMsg(msg, oo));
}
void stopLogger() {
loggerTid.send(QuitMsg());
}
private:
On Sunday, 20 May 2012 at 21:19:14 UTC, p0xel wrote:
This seems to work when the class is in the same file as
main(), but if I move it to it's own file and use "import foo"
it errors. What am I missing?
When you write "import foo;" and then foo.bar, the compiler
thinks that
you a referring to
This seems to work when the class is in the same file as main(),
but if I move it to it's own file and use "import foo" it errors.
What am I missing?
I pretty sure I'm an idiot.
[code]
class foo {
public static int bar() {
return 0;
}
}
[/code]
How do I call bar() without creating an instance of foo?
foo.bar() results in "Error: undefined identifier 'bar'"
I'm having a really hard time finding anything relat
On 2012-05-20 18:25, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Seems like I misunderstood what you were saying. Right, the C runtime on
*Windows* is closed source. But, I don't know why you think that
function is called by the C runtime; see src/rt/dmain2.d.
Have a look again. It's only called on Posix:
htt
On 20-05-2012 18:20, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 20-05-2012 10:41, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
Looks like `_STI_monitor_staticctor` is called by C runtime on Windows.
And C runtime isn't open-source.
It creates troubles for investigation druntime (for me at least). Why is
it so? Why not to call
On 20-05-2012 10:41, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
Looks like `_STI_monitor_staticctor` is called by C runtime on Windows.
And C runtime isn't open-source.
It creates troubles for investigation druntime (for me at least). Why is
it so? Why not to call everything in C `main`, what's the reason?
If t
On 19/05/2012 16:13, maarten van damme wrote:
A huge optimization could be made by storing and int array of already
found primes and test all primes smaller then half the to-test number.
this will speed up a lot.
Do you mean build an array of already-found primes and use them to test new primes
On Sunday, 20 May 2012 at 13:51:45 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
This proggy will always print "1" because writeln() prints the
value from the main thread. Spawned thread will have own value.
Remember TLS is the default storage.
This is wrong. _Global_ (or static) variables are in TLS by
default, b
I don't think there is, but maybe you could use some template
constraints from std.traits, like isPointer:
if (!isPointer!T && !is(T == class))
There's probably other cases to consider, I'll leave others to fill in.
On 5/20/12, japplegame wrote:
> I write function template that should works only
On Saturday, 19 May 2012 at 08:16:39 UTC, luka8088 wrote:
Hello to all,
I would like to know if D guarantees that access to primitive
variable is atomic ?
I was looking for any source of information that says anything
about unsynchronized access to primitive variables. What I want
to know i
I write function template that should works only with POD types
(i.e. base types, structures, enums etc.). Is there something
like C++11 std::is_pod
(http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/is_pod) template?
Looks like `_STI_monitor_staticctor` is called by C runtime on Windows.
And C runtime isn't open-source.
It creates troubles for investigation druntime (for me at least). Why is
it so? Why not to call everything in C `main`, what's the reason?
If there is no list of stuff done before C `main`
--> 09:33, "Kenji Hara"
--> 08:57, Kenji Hara wrote:
>> It seems to me that is a regression by fixing bug 6475.
>> Now I'm trying to fix them.
>
>
> I've filed the bug in bugzilla:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8123
>
> And posted a pull request to fix it:
> https://github.com/
On Sunday, 20 May 2012 at 06:57:20 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
On Saturday, 19 May 2012 at 18:17:16 UTC, Matthias Walter wrote:
Using the current git version of dmd I realized that C works!
Hence, as
a workaround it can be used by creating a local alias A and
subsequently
using A.Alias in the is-ex
19 matches
Mail list logo
