On 2012-06-08 22:47, Era Scarecrow wrote:
> On Friday, 8 June 2012 at 16:33:28 UTC, Matthias Walter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> trying to traverse the entries of a std.bitmanip.BitArray I stumbled
>> upon the following problem:
>>
>> In case I want to accept const(BitArray) objects, it shall look like
>> t
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:57:47 -0700, Andrew Wiley wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Jonathan M Davis
> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, June 08, 2012 19:30:57 Jarl André"
>> @puremagic.com wrote:
>> > Evry single time I encounter them I yawn. It means using the next
>> > frickin hour to comment away
I generate bindings to a c library, and one of folders is named
`shared`, which is a keyword and thus cannot be used as a package
name.
One option is to remove this package and put files to a parent
directory, or simply rename it.
Is there any way to avoid this and keep the name as is? What
Oops, forgot the code.
"4. Unit inference engine: Given some notation for optionally
indicating units, e.g. unit(value), could a D metaprogram
examine the following code, infer the correct units, and issue
an error message on the last line?
auto mass = kg(2.0);
auto accel = 1.0;
auto force =
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:57:47 -0700, Andrew Wiley wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Jonathan M Davis
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, June 08, 2012 19:30:57 Jarl André"
>>> @puremagic.com wrote:
>>> > Evry single time I encounter them I yaw
With
ints, the best we can do is 0. With floats, NaN makes it better.
With the logic that NaN is the default for floats, 0 is a very
bad choice for ints. It the worst we could do. Altough I
understand that setting it to something else like -infinity is
still not a good choice.
I think that
Hi --
I've been trying to learn more about D's purity features after
reading David Nadlinger's interesting post on this topic. While
'purifying' some existing code I discovered that I can't use
roundTo in a pure function, and I don't understand why. Is this a
general problem with most floatin
On 09/06/12 14:42, Minas wrote:
>> With
>> ints, the best we can do is 0. With floats, NaN makes it better.
>
> With the logic that NaN is the default for floats, 0 is a very bad
> choice for ints. It the worst we could do. Altough I understand that
> setting it to something else like -infinity is
On 09/06/12 20:48, Kevin wrote:
On 09/06/12 14:42, Minas wrote:
With
ints, the best we can do is 0. With floats, NaN makes it better.
With the logic that NaN is the default for floats, 0 is a very bad
choice for ints. It the worst we could do. Altough I understand that
setting it to somethin
On Sat 09 Jun 2012 14:59:21 EDT, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>
> On 09/06/12 20:48, Kevin wrote:
>> On 09/06/12 14:42, Minas wrote:
With
ints, the best we can do is 0. With floats, NaN makes it better.
>>>
>>> With the logic that NaN is the default for floats, 0 is a very bad
>>> choice for in
On 09/06/12 20:42, Minas wrote:
With
ints, the best we can do is 0. With floats, NaN makes it better.
With the logic that NaN is the default for floats, 0 is a very bad choice for
ints. It the worst we could do. Altough I understand that setting it to
something else like -infinity is still
On Saturday, June 09, 2012 20:43:42 Chris Saunders wrote:
> Hi --
>
> I've been trying to learn more about D's purity features after
> reading David Nadlinger's interesting post on this topic. While
> 'purifying' some existing code I discovered that I can't use
> roundTo in a pure function, and I
On Saturday, 9 June 2012 at 10:09:25 UTC, Matthias Walter wrote:
First, thank you for your answer. I've already made some tiny
modifications in order to make BitArray work for my purposes:
https://github.com/xammy/phobos/commit/eb46d99217f2bf1e6d173964e2954248b08146d6
If you plan to create pul
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Kevin wrote:
> On Sat 09 Jun 2012 14:59:21 EDT, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 09/06/12 20:48, Kevin wrote:
> >> On 09/06/12 14:42, Minas wrote:
> With
> ints, the best we can do is 0. With floats, NaN makes it better.
> >>>
> >>> With the logic tha
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Andrew Wiley wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Kevin wrote:
>>
>> On Sat 09 Jun 2012 14:59:21 EDT, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 09/06/12 20:48, Kevin wrote:
>> >> On 09/06/12 14:42, Minas wrote:
>> With
>> ints, the best we can do is 0
Hello:
On 10/06/12 01:57, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Kevin wrote:
On Sat 09 Jun 2012 14:59:21 EDT, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 09/06/12 20:48, Kevin wrote:
On 09/06/12 14:42, Minas wrote:
With
ints, the best we
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 02:32:18 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I see. So the alternative, to get a kind of NaN effect, would be to set
> integers to their hardware extremum (INT_MAX,SIZE_MAX,...). But this option
> is hardware dependent, so zero as default for integers sounds the best
> option.
??? All
On Saturday, 9 June 2012 at 19:33:55 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, June 09, 2012 20:43:42 Chris Saunders wrote:
Hi --
I've been trying to learn more about D's purity features after
reading David Nadlinger's interesting post on this topic. While
'purifying' some existing code I disco
On 10/06/12 02:49, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 02:32:18 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I see. So the alternative, to get a kind of NaN effect, would be to set
integers to their hardware extremum (INT_MAX,SIZE_MAX,...). But this option
is hardware dependent, so zero as default for in
On 10/06/12 02:49, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 02:32:18 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I see. So the alternative, to get a kind of NaN effect, would be to set
integers to their hardware extremum (INT_MAX,SIZE_MAX,...). But this option
is hardware dependent, so zero as default for in
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 04:06:03 Chris Saunders wrote:
> Thanks Jonathan. Sounds like a practical issue rather than some
> theoretical problem -- good to know.
The vast majority of purity issues with Phobos are purely an implementation
issue and not any kind of limit in the language. Obviously s
On 06/08/2012 02:00 PM, Justin Whear wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:30:57 +0200, Jarl André wrote:
Evry single time I encounter them I yawn. It means using the next
frickin hour to comment away code, add more log statements and try to
eleminate whats creating the hell of bugz, segmantation fault
22 matches
Mail list logo
