On 06/10/2012 12:30 AM, Era Scarecrow wrote:
> On Saturday, 9 June 2012 at 10:09:25 UTC, Matthias Walter wrote:
>> First, thank you for your answer. I've already made some tiny
>> modifications in order to make BitArray work for my purposes:
>>
>> https://github.com/xammy/phobos/commit/eb46d99217f2
That doesn't work for me, hence using assembler. I get:
Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcod.c 1447
On Monday, 11 June 2012 at 03:19:08 UTC, ixid wrote:
struct a
{ align(16) int[4] test = [1,2,3,4];
}
a test;
asm
{
movdqa XMM0, test ;
addps XMM0, XMM0;
movdpa test, XMM0 ;
}
This works fine with unaligned movdqu but thro
struct a
{ align(16) int[4] test = [1,2,3,4];
}
a test;
asm
{
movdqa XMM0, test ;
addps XMM0, XMM0;
movdpa test, XMM0 ;
}
This works fine with unaligned movdqu but throws an access
violation exception with movdqa. Why isn
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 20:21:29 1100110 wrote:
> http://svn.dsource.org/projects/gtkd/branches/070125merge/gtkD/src/gdk/Color
> .d
>
>
> uint getValue()
> {
> return (gdkColor.red <<32) | (gdkColor.green << 16) | (gdkColor.blue);
> }
>
>
> Just browsing through the source it looks like
http://svn.dsource.org/projects/gtkd/branches/070125merge/gtkD/src/gdk/Color.d
uint getValue()
{
return (gdkColor.red <<32) | (gdkColor.green << 16) | (gdkColor.blue);
}
Just browsing through the source it looks like gtkColor.red is a ushort.
I get this error.
dmd -O -m64 -Isrc -c src
I see.
Thank you,guys)
On Sunday, June 10, 2012 12:05:48 Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 06/10/2012 10:08 AM, Zhenya wrote:
> > Hi!Today I completly understood,what I don't now what is the difference
> > between template and mixin template
>
> There is a terminology problem: there is no such thing as "mixin
> templates". Ther
On 06/10/12 19:45, Zhenya wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 June 2012 at 17:34:19 UTC, Zhenya wrote:
>> I read in documentation,that we have two ways to use mixin statement.
>> 1st: mixin(string_wich_can_be_evaluated_at_compile_time);
>> 2st:mixin template
>> I could'nt find any information about such way to
On 06/10/2012 10:08 AM, Zhenya wrote:
> Hi!Today I completly understood,what I don't now what is the difference
> between template and mixin template
There is a terminology problem: there is no such thing as "mixin
templates". There are only templates.
D also has the mixin feature with two fla
On Sunday, 10 June 2012 at 17:34:19 UTC, Zhenya wrote:
I read in documentation,that we have two ways to use mixin
statement.
1st: mixin(string_wich_can_be_evaluated_at_compile_time);
2st:mixin template
I could'nt find any information about such way to use it
Also,in this case if we add "mixin"
I read in documentation,that we have two ways to use mixin
statement.
1st: mixin(string_wich_can_be_evaluated_at_compile_time);
2st:mixin template
I could'nt find any information about such way to use it
On 06/10/12 19:08, Zhenya wrote:
> Hi!Today I completly understood,what I don't now what is the difference
> between template and mixin template,becouse I think that this should'nt
> work.But compiler is disagree.Could anybody explain me please?
>
> import std.stdio;
>
> int x;
> template smth(
Hi!Today I completly understood,what I don't now what is the
difference between template and mixin template,becouse I think
that this should'nt work.But compiler is disagree.Could anybody
explain me please?
import std.stdio;
int x;
template smth()
{
void smth(){x = 1;}
}
void main()
Am Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:07:17 +0200
schrieb "David Piepgrass" :
> Oops, forgot the code.
>
> > "4. Unit inference engine: Given some notation for optionally
> > indicating units, e.g. unit(value), could a D metaprogram
> > examine the following code, infer the correct units, and issue
> > an er
On Sunday, 10 June 2012 at 10:23:09 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
No there is not. You could use a template that calls a private
function at compile time instead. What is your use case?
I was just thinking about a situation where a property
accessor/mutator methods are not as simple as read/assign va
Le vendredi 08 juin 2012 à 19:30 +0200, Jarl =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIg==?= a
écrit :
> Evry single time I encounter them I yawn. It means using the next
> frickin hour to comment away code, add more log statements and
> try to eleminate whats creating the hell of bugz, segmantation
> fault. Why can't
On 06/10/2012 09:04 AM, Tommi wrote:
Three related questions:
1) Is there a way to force a function to be always executed at compile
time (when it's possible to do so) no matter what context it's called in?
No there is not. You could use a template that calls a private function
at compile ti
1) Is there a way to force a function to be always executed at
compile time (when it's possible to do so) no matter what
context it's called in?
No, but you could wrap it in a template to force it to always
execute at compile time. Of course it could then only be called
at compile time.
2) Is
Three related questions:
1) Is there a way to force a function to be always executed at
compile time (when it's possible to do so) no matter what context
it's called in?
2) Is it possible to specialize a function based on whether or
not the parameter that was passed in is a compile time cons
20 matches
Mail list logo
