On Thursday, June 14, 2012 08:30:26 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-06-14 00:48, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 14, 2012 00:32:45 BLM768 wrote:
> >> For some reason, whenever I declare a method with package
> >> visibility, it becomes non-virtual. Is this normal behavior, or
> >> is
On 2012-06-14 00:48, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 00:32:45 BLM768 wrote:
For some reason, whenever I declare a method with package
visibility, it becomes non-virtual. Is this normal behavior, or
is there a bug in DMD 2.059?
Only public and protected functions can be virtu
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:12:19 +0200, ixid wrote:
Perhaps there is already a way to do this. With the UFCS one tends to
make elegant chains of statements, it would be useful to have writeln
and file functions that can easily be dropped in the middle of such
chains without having to alter the
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 00:17:25 Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
> On 6/11/2012 7:15 AM, Trass3r wrote:
> >> I think it has been fixed for the next version of DMD already. Any
> >> idea why align isn't letting me use movdqa?
> >
> > Cause align doesn't work the way you think it does.
> > In fact I still
On 6/11/2012 7:15 AM, Trass3r wrote:
I think it has been fixed for the next version of DMD already. Any
idea why align isn't letting me use movdqa?
Cause align doesn't work the way you think it does.
In fact I still don't understand how it works at all.
The language align keyword can only red
On 06/14/2012 01:57 AM, BLM768 wrote:
I guess that another solution to this whole mess is to just start
requiring the use of override; then everyone would be educated and it
would be obvious where the bug is in the code I posted. Since we don't
want to break code, though, maybe there should be a
I guess that another solution to this whole mess is to just start
requiring the use of override; then everyone would be educated
and it would be obvious where the bug is in the code I posted.
Since we don't want to break code, though, maybe there should be
a message prominently displayed on the
True, but it will be explicit in the derived class code:
No 'override', no function that is overridden.
However, if a programmer expects it to override, there could be
an issue. Imagine a novice D programmer who is not used to using
"override" and looks at at the following code:
class Bas
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 01:34:42 BLM768 wrote:
> > override will eventually be required when overriding a
> > function. It is already
> > if you compile with -w but not yet all of the time - though
> > since protected
> > isn't virtual and isn't really overriding anything, the
> > compiler doesn
On 06/14/2012 01:34 AM, BLM768 wrote:
override will eventually be required when overriding a function. It is
already
if you compile with -w but not yet all of the time - though since
protected
isn't virtual and isn't really overriding anything, the compiler doesn't
complain if you don't use ov
override will eventually be required when overriding a
function. It is already
if you compile with -w but not yet all of the time - though
since protected
isn't virtual and isn't really overriding anything, the
compiler doesn't
complain if you don't use override with it (though it will if
y
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 01:07:17 BLM768 wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 22:48:34 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 14, 2012 00:32:45 BLM768 wrote:
> >> For some reason, whenever I declare a method with package
> >> visibility, it becomes non-virtual. Is this normal b
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 22:48:34 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 00:32:45 BLM768 wrote:
For some reason, whenever I declare a method with package
visibility, it becomes non-virtual. Is this normal behavior, or
is there a bug in DMD 2.059?
Only public and protected
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 00:32:45 BLM768 wrote:
> For some reason, whenever I declare a method with package
> visibility, it becomes non-virtual. Is this normal behavior, or
> is there a bug in DMD 2.059?
Only public and protected functions can be virtual. private and package
functions are neve
For some reason, whenever I declare a method with package
visibility, it becomes non-virtual. Is this normal behavior, or
is there a bug in DMD 2.059?
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 17:21:15 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 15:53:15 UTC, Jarl André wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 10:24:58 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 13.06.2012 1:29, D Day wrote:
Are there any implementations of this anywhere for D?
I really only
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 15:53:15 UTC, Jarl André wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 10:24:58 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 13.06.2012 1:29, D Day wrote:
Are there any implementations of this anywhere for D?
I really only care about the windows platform - and have
considered
writing
On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 19:06:29 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since what GDB version does decent support for the D DWARF extensions exist?
IIRC, you need at least gdb 7.2.
- Jonathan M Davis
Hi,
Since what GDB version does decent support for the D DWARF extensions exist?
--
Alex Rønne Petersen
a...@lycus.org
http://lycus.org
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 10:24:58 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 13.06.2012 1:29, D Day wrote:
Are there any implementations of this anywhere for D?
I really only care about the windows platform - and have
considered
writing this myself with IOCP and std.socket, but I figure
someone els
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 15:15:11 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 19:35:47 UTC, Henrik Valter
Vogelius Hansson wrote:
Nice thanks! That will help me out a lot!
Is there a "D" way to do it? Or is D too young to have that
yet?
The D way is to have all classes in one file.
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 19:35:47 UTC, Henrik Valter Vogelius
Hansson wrote:
Nice thanks! That will help me out a lot!
Is there a "D" way to do it? Or is D too young to have that yet?
The D way is to have all classes in one file.
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 13:03:04 UTC, Zhenya wrote:
When I wanted to use native opengl binding
module main;
import std.stdio;
import c.gl.gl;
pragma(lib,"opengl32.lib");
import c.gl.glu;
pragma(lib,"glu32.lib");
int main(string[] argv)
{
writeln("Hello D-World!");
return 0;
}
DM
On Saturday, 9 June 2012 at 17:07:19 UTC, David Piepgrass wrote:
auto mass = kg(2.0);
auto accel = 1.0;
auto force = mass*accel;
accel += metresPerSecondSquared(9.81); // units of 'force' and
'accel' now known
force += pounds(3.0); // unit mismatch detected
accel will be doub
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 14:05:46 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
wrote:
13.06.2012 17:53, Zhenya пишет:
Те которые с DMC идут он проглотит
Да. В FAQ есть ссылка на coff2omf, но он
проприетарный. Может помочь coffimplib:
http://www.digitalmars.com/ctg/coffimplib.html
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/c
13.06.2012 17:53, Zhenya пишет:
Те которые с DMC идут он проглотит
Да. В FAQ есть ссылка на coff2omf, но он проприетарный. Может помочь
coffimplib:
http://www.digitalmars.com/ctg/coffimplib.html
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/coffimplib.zip
--
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 13:44:51 UTC, Zhenya wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 13:16:20 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
wrote:
13.06.2012 17:03, Zhenya пишет:
When I wanted to use native opengl binding
...
DMD wrote:opengl32.lib
Error 43: Not a Valid Library File
But why can't dmd link it?
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 13:16:20 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
wrote:
13.06.2012 17:03, Zhenya пишет:
When I wanted to use native opengl binding
...
DMD wrote:opengl32.lib
Error 43: Not a Valid Library File
But why can't dmd link it?
http://dlang.org/faq.html#omf
Cпасибо=)
А не подскажеш
13.06.2012 17:03, Zhenya пишет:
When I wanted to use native opengl binding
...
DMD wrote:opengl32.lib
Error 43: Not a Valid Library File
But why can't dmd link it?
http://dlang.org/faq.html#omf
--
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij
When I wanted to use native opengl binding
module main;
import std.stdio;
import c.gl.gl;
pragma(lib,"opengl32.lib");
import c.gl.glu;
pragma(lib,"glu32.lib");
int main(string[] argv)
{
writeln("Hello D-World!");
return 0;
}
DMD wrote:opengl32.lib
Error 43: Not a Valid Library File
B
On 13.06.2012 1:29, D Day wrote:
Are there any implementations of this anywhere for D?
I really only care about the windows platform - and have considered
writing this myself with IOCP and std.socket, but I figure someone else
must have already done something similar?
Take a look at vibe.d. Wh
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:29:58 +0100, D Day wrote:
Are there any implementations of this anywhere for D?
I really only care about the windows platform - and have considered
writing this myself with IOCP and std.socket, but I figure someone else
must have already done something similar?
Not
32 matches
Mail list logo
