Is there any means to get meaningful moduleinfo at compile time,
specifically a list of the local classes of a given module?
__traits(allMembers, mod) doesn't work: inverse.d(109): Error:
import data has no members.
I was hoping that something along these lines would be possible
in CTFE:
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 09:48:39 Namespace wrote:
The strange constructs in std.algorithm aren't something i like
to use in real projects. Is there some other solution?
And what's so strange about them? That they use ranges? If you start avoiding
ranges, you're going to be missing out on a
On Saturday, 21 July 2012 at 21:12:55 UTC, Namespace wrote:
I'm not sure if it's a bug or my code is nonsense. ;)
While there are some bugs D, you have to realize that D is a
garbage collected language, which means you should not rely on
objects being destructed in a timely fashion (or at
Yes, C++ was my previous language.
And no, nobody say anything about Ranges. But i doesn't like
stuff who is deprecated as language feature and is rebuild as
std.algorithm construct. It is that simple. :)
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:16:25 Namespace wrote:
Yes, C++ was my previous language.
And no, nobody say anything about Ranges. But i doesn't like
stuff who is deprecated as language feature and is rebuild as
std.algorithm construct. It is that simple. :)
std.algorithm doesn't have anything
Oh yes, i mean std.typecons, not std.algorithm, my bad.
If delete will be deprecated, how can i delete/call dtor of one
of my objects manually?
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:46:51 Namespace wrote:
Oh yes, i mean std.typecons, not std.algorithm, my bad.
If delete will be deprecated, how can i delete/call dtor of one
of my objects manually?
You're _really_ not supposed to be doing that. If you're dealing with GC
allocated memory, then
Right now I'm a bit confused. I assume that the garbage collector and
some other parts from druntime need startup code. But what gets run
first is my main method in the d file I compile.
Does this mean that the first call to something in druntime calls that
startup code? If not, what does get ran
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:30:14 +0200
maarten van damme maartenvd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Right now I'm a bit confused. I assume that the garbage collector and
some other parts from druntime need startup code. But what gets run
first is my main method in the d file I compile.
Actually, that's just
2012/7/22 Nick Sabalausky seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com:
Actually, that's just a clever illusion. Your main() method isn't
really the first thing called, the first thing called is a function in
druntime called dmain (or Dmain or _dmain or something like that, I
forget offhand). This
The reason for my experiements is just to find a good solution
for Not Null types. :)
As long as they are not implement in std.typecons. Maybe you take
my solution, if i have some. ;)
On Sunday, 22 July 2012 at 10:42:58 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Actually, that's just a clever illusion. Your main() method
isn't
really the first thing called, the first thing called is a
function in
druntime called dmain (or Dmain or _dmain or something like
that, I
forget offhand). This
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Chris NS ibisbase...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any means to get meaningful moduleinfo at compile time,
specifically a list of the local classes of a given module?
__traits(allMembers, mod) doesn't work: inverse.d(109): Error: import data
has no members.
I was
On 07/22/2012 01:46 AM, Namespace wrote:
Oh yes, i mean std.typecons, not std.algorithm, my bad.
If delete will be deprecated, how can i delete/call dtor of one of my
objects manually?
In C++, deleting involves two steps: call the destructor and release the
memory.
It is different in D:
On 2012-07-21 19:11, Namespace wrote:
Equally when they are passed as normal parameters.
Really? I didn't know that.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On the other hand, calling the destructor is still acceptable
in D because it may be important for the programmer to run the
contents earlier than GC would. clear() does that:
auto t = new Test(f3);
// ...
clear(t);// -- Run the destructor
Unfortunately it has a bad name,
Nice to know. A name like destroy or delete would be better
i think.
But isn't a solution for the not null problem.
A other question:
How can i check if t is valid, after i call clear?
[code]
import std.stdio;
class Test {
public:
this() {
writeln(CTor);
}
~this() {
writeln(DTor);
}
}
void main() {
Test t = new Test();
A other question:
How can i check if t is valid, after i call clear?
[code]
import std.stdio;
class Test {
public:
this() {
writeln(CTor);
}
~this() {
writeln(DTor);
}
}
void main() {
Test t = new Test();
On 07/22/2012 09:27 AM, Mafi wrote:
Unfortunately it has a bad name, which is going to be changed.
Really? I thought we have to stay with this name now. In my
opinion this name is quite bad, especially in the presence of
UFCS. What is going to be changed to? destroy()?
Yep! :) It should be
On Sunday, 22 July 2012 at 17:41:33 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/22/2012 09:27 AM, Mafi wrote:
Unfortunately it has a bad name, which is going to be
changed.
Really? I thought we have to stay with this name now. In my
opinion this name is quite bad, especially in the presence of
UFCS.
On 07/22/2012 09:35 AM, Namespace wrote:
A other question:
How can i check if t is valid, after i call clear?
After the destructor is run, the object itself is put into a strange
state. I amnot really sure about the actual details but I think the
virtual function table is cleared (or perhaps
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 20:14:20 Namespace wrote:
On Sunday, 22 July 2012 at 17:41:33 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/22/2012 09:27 AM, Mafi wrote:
Unfortunately it has a bad name, which is going to be
changed.
Really? I thought we have to stay with this name now. In my
opinion
On Sunday, 22 July 2012 at 18:14:21 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Sunday, 22 July 2012 at 17:41:33 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/22/2012 09:27 AM, Mafi wrote:
Unfortunately it has a bad name, which is going to be
changed.
Really? I thought we have to stay with this name now. In my
opinion this
Works fine. :)
Now my little test case work as expected:
[code]
import std.stdio;
class Test {
public:
this() {
writeln(CTor);
}
~this() {
writeln(DTor);
}
void echo() const {
writeln(Here is Test);
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 20:45:05 monarch_dodra wrote:
AFAIK, there are no invalid objects in D*. structs don't have
default constructors, because they all have a compile time init
value which they are filled with when
emptied/moved/cleared. Ergo, even after being destroyed,
they are still
hi,
i can't seem to find how to do this in the docs ... simple example
i have 2 times 9:00,12:00 for which i need to get the interval
between them in minutes, ie 180
i though I could use Interval!TimeOfDay(9:00:00,12:00:00) and
convert this to minutes from here but this does not seem to be
On Sunday, 22 July 2012 at 20:50:15 UTC, vurentjie wrote:
hi,
i can't seem to find how to do this in the docs ... simple
example
i have 2 times 9:00,12:00 for which i need to get the interval
between them in minutes, ie 180
i though I could use Interval!TimeOfDay(9:00:00,12:00:00)
and
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 22:50:14 vurentjie wrote:
hi,
i can't seem to find how to do this in the docs ... simple example
i have 2 times 9:00,12:00 for which i need to get the interval
between them in minutes, ie 180
i though I could use Interval!TimeOfDay(9:00:00,12:00:00) and
convert
On 7/22/12, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Yeah. Don't have them be template parameters unless you need to, otherwise
you
get a different template instantiation _every_ time that you call the
function.
I've just noticed something:
@property front(T)(T arr, string file =
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 23:40:16 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 7/22/12, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Yeah. Don't have them be template parameters unless you need to, otherwise
you
get a different template instantiation _every_ time that you call the
function.
I've just
On Sunday, 22 July 2012 at 21:16:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 22:50:14 vurentjie wrote:
hi,
i can't seem to find how to do this in the docs ... simple
example
i have 2 times 9:00,12:00 for which i need to get the interval
between them in minutes, ie 180
i though
I can't see why the following limitation:
class C
{
void foo(alias Func)()
{}
}
void main()
{
auto c = new C();
c.foo!(x = x)(); // -- Compilation error
}
Error: template instance foo!(__lambda2) cannot use local
'__lambda2(__T1)' as parameter to non-global template foo(alias
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 17:40:36 Ali Çehreli wrote:
I can't see why the following limitation:
class C
{
void foo(alias Func)()
{}
}
void main()
{
auto c = new C();
c.foo!(x = x)(); // -- Compilation error
}
Error: template instance foo!(__lambda2) cannot use
On 07/22/2012 06:08 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 17:40:36 Ali Çehreli wrote:
I can't see why the following limitation:
class C
{
void foo(alias Func)()
{}
}
void main()
{
auto c = new C();
c.foo!(x = x)(); //-- Compilation error
}
35 matches
Mail list logo
