On 10/1/12, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> Error 42: Symbol Undefined _VarCmp@16
P.S. as soon as pointers are involved you don't need the full type
info of such a parameter to debug linker errors, so you can cut down
on code when reducing. For example if you had to match this C function
but are get
On Friday, 28 September 2012 at 18:10:36 UTC, David wrote:
So I want to make the compilation of my little game work on
Windows, I set up MinGW with Msys and ran the makefile, after a
few fixes compilation worked, the problem is linking fails hard.
I need a few external libraries in C like glfw
On Monday, 1 October 2012 at 04:10:25 UTC, Ivan Agafonov wrote:
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 06:20:56 UTC, jerro wrote:
The second one uses fstp twice, then fld twice. I don't know,
maybe
this could be a bug.
You're right the lack of one fst/fld in the first case is a
bug. x87 floating po
I'm trying to identify what change has resulted in getting the
error:
Error 42: Symbol Undefined _VarCmp@16
I was doing my not so routine updates for the Juno Class
Libraries. This symbol is the VARIANT compare function provided
by oleaut32.lib on Windows. It is a very nice function and h
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 06:20:56 UTC, jerro wrote:
The second one uses fstp twice, then fld twice. I don't know,
maybe
this could be a bug.
You're right the lack of one fst/fld in the first case is a
bug. x87 floating point registers are 80 bit. This:
fstpdword [ebp-0CH]
Conver
Thanks!
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 21:20:40 UTC, jerro wrote:
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 20:51:54 UTC, mist wrote:
Thanks!
Unfortunately, return type issue is more important in my case.
I'll check if implementation from ParameterStorageClassTuple
can be adapted for return types thou
Anyone having experience in using WIC? How can I render, let's
say a png file on disk, to the screen?
Technically (AFAIK), IEEE754 does need require reproducibility,
ergo determinism.
It actually requires more than that:
"Algebraic operations covered by IEEE 754, namely + , - , * , / ,
square root and Binary <-> Decimal Conversion with rare
exceptions, must be Correctly Rounded to the prec
On 9/30/12, jerro wrote:
> I think this should work:
>
> template returnsRef(alias f)
> {
> enum bool returnsRef = is(typeof(
> {
> ParameterTypeTuple!f param;
> auto ptr = &f(param);
> }));
> }
Yep. We should add this to Phobos imo.
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 20:51:54 UTC, mist wrote:
Thanks!
Unfortunately, return type issue is more important in my case.
I'll check if implementation from ParameterStorageClassTuple
can be adapted for return types though.
I think this should work:
template returnsRef(alias f)
{
e
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 20:47:41 UTC, jerro wrote:
I don't really agree with that. floating point operations are
just inexact, regardless of optimizations. That's how they
work, period.
It is true that they are inexact, but inexact and
non-deterministic are not the same thing. Floatin
Thanks!
Unfortunately, return type issue is more important in my case.
I'll check if implementation from ParameterStorageClassTuple can
be adapted for return types though.
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 20:37:14 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 9/30/12, mist wrote:
How can I:
1) check if fu
I don't really agree with that. floating point operations are
just inexact, regardless of optimizations. That's how they
work, period.
It is true that they are inexact, but inexact and
non-deterministic are not the same thing. Floating point
operations are deterministic. Doing the same operat
On 9/30/12, mist wrote:
> How can I:
> 1) check if function returns by ref
> 2) check if function parameters are ref
> ..outside of function body. Is parsing typeof(func).stringof only
> valid option?
>
See ParameterStorageClassTuple in std.traits
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_traits.html
I'm not
On 9/30/12, Tommi wrote:
> On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 01:48:04 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
> wrote:
>>
>> Dissasembly:
>> __Dmain:; Function begin, communal
>> enter 12, 0 ;
>> _ C8, 000C, 00
>> call_D4test8getFloatFNdZf
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 18:31:17 UTC, so wrote:
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 17:07:19 UTC, monarch_dodra
wrote:
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 01:29:24 UTC, Ivan Agafonov
wrote:
// Tell me about this sutation, may be it is a bug?
[SNIP]
// all of this fails!!!
asser
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 17:07:19 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 01:29:24 UTC, Ivan Agafonov
wrote:
// Tell me about this sutation, may be it is a bug?
[SNIP]
// all of this fails!!!
assert (a.length == a.length); // This is really shocking
How can I:
1) check if function returns by ref
2) check if function parameters are ref
..outside of function body. Is parsing typeof(func).stringof only
valid option?
Thanks to all of you for your informative replies. I was testing
different code structures and wondered whether this was possible.
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 01:29:24 UTC, Ivan Agafonov wrote:
// Tell me about this sutation, may be it is a bug?
[SNIP]
// all of this fails!!!
assert (a.length == a.length); // This is really shocking
assert (a.length == a3.length);
[SNIP]
This is just a fact of
On 09/30/2012 04:06 AM, Tommi wrote:
> On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 01:48:04 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>>
>> Dissasembly:
>> __Dmain:; Function begin, communal
>> enter 12, 0 ; _ C8, 000C, 00
>> call _D4test8getFloatFNdZf ; 0004 _ E8,
>> (rel)
>> ...
>
> Can I tell DMD to produce
On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 01:48:04 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Dissasembly:
__Dmain:; Function begin, communal
enter 12, 0 ;
_ C8, 000C, 00
call_D4test8getFloatFNdZf ; 0004
_ E8,
(rel)
...
Can I tel
On Saturday, 29 September 2012 at 23:07:30 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/30/2012 01:04 AM, bioinfornatics wrote:
hi,
int[] list = [ 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ];
why this do not works ?
list.reduce!( (a,b) => a + b )( 0 ); // sum all elements
but by this way that is ok:
reduce!( (a,b) =>
23 matches
Mail list logo
