On Tuesday, 16 April 2013 at 21:14:16 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/16/2013 08:44 AM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
When that happens, would you expect a and b also become handles
to the new object? It could I guess, but it sounds impractical
in a system language. The runtime does not maintain a record of
I wrote a program and had it working fine, Then made a change so I could
change the file name from the command line. Now the progrram refuses to
open the file.
File efile;
writefln("command line %s", args[]);
if(args.length == 3) {
type = to!int( args[1] );
//
Hi Ali,
Thanks for the help, looks like synchronized blocks are what I
want.
I just found your book online the other day too, nice work!
Cheers,
Stewart
On Tuesday, 16 April 2013 at 20:00:37 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
16-Apr-2013 22:59, Linden Krouse пишет:
Is there a way to use the regex library to put matches of
different
regexs or classes into different slices? For instance, if I
had the
regular expressions "(?<=#)\w+\b" and "(?<=%)\w+\b",
On 04/16/2013 08:44 AM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 April 2013 at 15:27:10 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 04/16/2013 07:57 AM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
>> It would be bad design if a class variable decided to refer to another
>> object without the owner of that variable knowing about it.
>
>
> I d
On Monday, 15 April 2013 at 19:25:19 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On Monday, 15 April 2013 at 17:34:07 UTC, gedaiu wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone help me to connect to mysql from D?
Thanks!
You can use Steve Teales native library. The most up-to-date
version is here:
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/my
16-Apr-2013 22:59, Linden Krouse пишет:
Is there a way to use the regex library to put matches of different
regexs or classes into different slices? For instance, if I had the
regular expressions "(?<=#)\w+\b" and "(?<=%)\w+\b", could I use them to
match a string at the same time and stop if the
Is there a way to use the regex library to put matches of
different regexs or classes into different slices? For instance,
if I had the regular expressions "(?<=#)\w+\b" and "(?<=%)\w+\b",
could I use them to match a string at the same time and stop if
the first one is found and keep their resu
On Tuesday, 16 April 2013 at 15:23:56 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
I would question always question "fully intended" on a case by
case basis:
http://www.drdobbs.com/cpp/how-non-member-functions-improve-encapsu/184401197
I agree that grouping functions together that should be used
together, or on th
Hey all,
I'm poking around D, trying to see if it will be worth my while
to learn it.
I've used XCB in C++ and Python before, and I was delighted to
see that D has an XCB
binding as well. The problem, however, is in the example program,
there is a segfault.
Here's the program:
http://pastebin.
On Tuesday, 16 April 2013 at 15:27:10 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/16/2013 07:57 AM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
It would be bad design if a class variable decided to refer to
another object without the owner of that variable knowing about
it.
I don't know, It seems like the caller of the function sh
On 04/15/2013 11:06 PM, estewh wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have this bit of code like this:
>
> shared bool varInitialized = false;
> bool initVar() {
> bool ret;
> synchronized { ret = varInitialized;}
> return ret;
> }
>
> I know there are atomics and I am using them but I am curious abo
On 04/16/2013 07:57 AM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
> seems like bad design to
> have a function that is fully intended to be a class function but not
> actually be able to declare it within the class block.
It would be bad design if a class variable decided to refer to another
object without the owner o
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:57:09 +0100, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 April 2013 at 14:33:21 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
A member function cannot modify it's own 'this' pointer.
However, a free function can do it happily, which when combined with
UFCS gives you the same syntax and behaviour:
c
On Tuesday, 16 April 2013 at 14:57:11 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 April 2013 at 14:33:21 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
A member function cannot modify it's own 'this' pointer.
However, a free function can do it happily, which when
combined with UFCS gives you the same syntax and behaviour:
On Tuesday, 16 April 2013 at 14:33:21 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
A member function cannot modify it's own 'this' pointer.
However, a free function can do it happily, which when combined
with UFCS gives you the same syntax and behaviour:
class A {
//..
}
void replace(ref A a)
{
On Tuesday, 16 April 2013 at 14:33:21 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
A member function cannot modify it's own 'this' pointer.
However, a free function can do it happily, which when combined
with UFCS gives you the same syntax and behaviour:
class A {
//..
}
void replace(ref A a)
{
On Tuesday, 16 April 2013 at 05:37:48 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
I could not think of what to call this because I don't know if
it has a name to call it by.
Basicly what I was wondering is if their was a way in D to make
a class function pass the object being called on by reference.
might be eas
Nicholas Smith:
(which would have an identical meaning to == as structs are
value types and can't be compared any other way).
You can redefine struct equality.
But, by default, equality tests if object references are equal,
Currently the equality is a method of object.
Bye,
bearophile
Hello there,
I was wondering what the differences are functionally and
semantically between '==' and 'is' beyond the two points here and
my interpretation below. Functionally:
- You must use 'is' to check for a null reference.
- 'is' cannot be overloaded, and it assesses reference types
based
On Monday, 15 April 2013 at 23:16:57 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
What would be the difference between C++11's rvalue reference
&& (see
for example
http://thbecker.net/articles/rvalue_references/section_03.html)
and D's proposed rvalue references (eg
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP36) ?
So far I only
21 matches
Mail list logo
