We really should aim to minimize the
wtfpmhttp://davidlongstreet.wordpress.com/2009/04/29/new-software-metric-wtfs-per-minute/
for
future users. I propose:
* support version(nocheckbounds) with same meaning as version(
D_NoBoundsChecks)
* list D_NoBoundsChecks as soft-deprecated. By
On Monday, June 03, 2013 23:17:03 Timothee Cour wrote:
We really should aim to minimize the
wtfpmhttp://davidlongstreet.wordpress.com/2009/04/29/new-software-metric-wt
fs-per-minute/ for
future users. I propose:
* support version(nocheckbounds) with same meaning as version(
D_NoBoundsChecks)
On Monday, 3 June 2013 at 22:19:23 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/03/2013 03:11 PM, Timothee Cour wrote:
Why aren't we using version=noboundscheck (+ friends) instead
of
-noboundscheck?
Hijack: what about version(integeroverflow)
?
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 09:14:28 eles wrote:
On Monday, 3 June 2013 at 22:19:23 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/03/2013 03:11 PM, Timothee Cour wrote:
Why aren't we using version=noboundscheck (+ friends) instead
of
-noboundscheck?
Hijack: what about version(integeroverflow)
My biggest annoyance with ddoc generated files is that when pasting code
samples (eg: The Example sample from
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm.html), newline characters disappear,
resulting in one giant line.
For example this is part of the html for the generated example box:
On Tuesday, 4 June 2013 at 07:19:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 09:14:28 eles wrote:
On Monday, 3 June 2013 at 22:19:23 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/03/2013 03:11 PM, Timothee Cour wrote:
Nothing in the language checks for integer overflow, and given
the overhead
given the overhead that it would introduce
Do you mean compiler-implementation overhead or resulting runtime overhead?
If you mean runtime overhead then I disagree, as this would be an opt-in
option enabled with, say, a version identifier such as
version=check_arithmetic_overflow (same as
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 00:38:17 Timothee Cour wrote:
given the overhead that it would introduce
Do you mean compiler-implementation overhead or resulting runtime overhead?
I'm talking about runtime overhead, and Walter is flat-out against it. Anyone
who wants it even in just non-release
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 09:30:07 eles wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 June 2013 at 07:19:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Walter has been against it every time that it's come up.
Yes, even in the -debug mode. What I fail to see is why. The
overhead will be there only if asked for, only in debug mode.
What are his arguments against an opt-in flag such as
version=check_arithmetic_overflow ?
* slowing down code is a very weak argument precisely because this would be
an opt-in flag (and wouldn't be implied by version=debug in my proposal).
* reliance on intentional overflow arithmetics could be
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 00:57:09 Timothee Cour wrote:
What are his arguments against an opt-in flag such as
version=check_arithmetic_overflow ?
I'm sure that you can find his arguments in a number of threads that have
discussed integer overflow. And if you want to get the situation changed,
On Monday, 3 June 2013 at 21:24:50 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
On 06/03/2013 08:28 PM, Diggory wrote:
I'd guess that the heavy use of floating point arithmetic to
calculate the step
sizes means that algorithm has a fairly large constant
overhead even though the
complexity is smaller.
On Tuesday, 4 June 2013 at 08:30:58 UTC, Diggory wrote:
On Monday, 3 June 2013 at 21:24:50 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
On 06/03/2013 08:28 PM, Diggory wrote:
I'd guess that the heavy use of floating point arithmetic to
calculate the step
sizes means that algorithm has a fairly large
Timothee Cour:
Any plan in adding a BR at the end of each line in ddoc
generation or
something similar, so that pasting will preserve newlines?
I agree, it's a small problem. I think it's not too much hard to
fix. Take a look in Bugzilla to see if it's already there,
otherwise submit it.
Here's the fixed one:
uint[] randomSample(uint N, uint M) {
uint[] result = new uint[N];
struct hashPair {
uint key;
uint index;
}
size_t tableSize = N*4;
if (tableSize M)
tableSize = M;
On 6/4/13, Timothee Cour thelastmamm...@gmail.com wrote:
My biggest annoyance with ddoc generated files is that when pasting code
samples (eg: The Example sample from
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm.html), newline characters disappear,
resulting in one giant line.
31.05.2013 8:56, Alexandr Druzhinin пишет:
Hello
I have code like this:
class SomeClass {
ubyte[] data_;
...
auto getObjectType() const {
if(data_ is null) {
writeln(throwing);
throw new Exception(Here the exception should be thrown!);
}
04.06.2013 19:18, Alexandr Druzhinin пишет:
31.05.2013 8:56, Alexandr Druzhinin пишет:
Hello
I have code like this:
class SomeClass {
ubyte[] data_;
...
auto getObjectType() const {
if(data_ is null) {
writeln(throwing);
throw new Exception(Here the
On 06/04/2013 02:03 PM, Diggory wrote:
Still a few places to optimise, and I think the compiler optimisation should
be
able to give a decent speed up as well. Would be interested to see how it
compares in your benchmark!
I'll try it out later and get back to you. :-)
Hi,
The following program runs, loads the DLL, excutes the function,
returns the correct value and unloads the DLL, but on exiting
causes an exception:
Unhandled exception at 0x0040f9c0 in USBRelay.exe: 0xC005:
Access violation writing location 0xffea.
The FT_STATUS is
On Monday, 3 June 2013 at 22:39:39 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/03/2013 03:20 PM, Bruno Deligny wrote:
I began to separate them by hand by passing a parent
reference but it's
ugly because i need to make the parent members accessible in
public to
have acces. Is there any friend like in C++
On Monday, 3 June 2013 at 09:29:20 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 21:26:56 +0100, ixid nuacco...@gmail.com
wrote:
We really don't want D to become a TMTOWTDI language.
Ideally there should be 1 right way and no alternatives.
That way, anyone who knows D will have a greater
On Saturday, 1 June 2013 at 10:11:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/01/2013 01:34 AM, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
All programs compiled by *DMD* produce a segfault. Programs
compiled
by GDC work just fine.
It is likely that GDC is from the D1 era.
Not that package, it's an old D2 release,
specifically, const, eg.
class A { void func() const { blah } }
std.traits.FunctionAttributes makes no mention of it
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 19:03:47 Ellery Newcomer wrote:
specifically, const, eg.
class A { void func() const { blah } }
std.traits.FunctionAttributes makes no mention of it
is(typeof(A.func) == const)
- Jonathan M Davis
On 06/04/2013 07:19 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 19:03:47 Ellery Newcomer wrote:
specifically, const, eg.
class A { void func() const { blah } }
std.traits.FunctionAttributes makes no mention of it
is(typeof(A.func) == const)
- Jonathan M Davis
I think that is
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 19:23:45 Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 06/04/2013 07:19 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 19:03:47 Ellery Newcomer wrote:
specifically, const, eg.
class A { void func() const { blah } }
std.traits.FunctionAttributes makes no mention of it
On 06/04/2013 07:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 19:23:45 Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 06/04/2013 07:19 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 19:03:47 Ellery Newcomer wrote:
specifically, const, eg.
class A { void func() const { blah } }
Ah, you're right. don't know how I screwed that up.
Yes I do. I was trying to use typeof(A.func)
On 06/04/2013 07:03 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
specifically, const, eg.
class A { void func() const { blah } }
std.traits.FunctionAttributes makes no mention of it
Not that it adds more information over the spec, but I have finished the
translation of the is Expression chapter just
30 matches
Mail list logo
