sure, I'll file a bug, but I'd like to know whether the auto tester checks
for these before a push is made to master:
* tools
* tools/update.sh (which is supposed to build everything)
* docs
each time i check, it fails in some new, creative ways
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:20 PM, H. S. Teoh wr
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 08:20:29PM -0700, Timothee Cour wrote:
> More often than not, the tools submodule (
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools) will not build on git
> master. So I'm wondering whether it's even being tested before pushing
> commits.
>
> The error I have now is with
More often than not, the tools submodule (
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools) will not build on git
master. So I'm wondering whether it's even being tested before pushing
commits.
The error I have now is with ddemangle:
std.md5 is scheduled for deprecation. Please use std.digest.md
On Friday, August 23, 2013 23:28:46 Matej Nanut wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've run into this issue that I don't understand, maybe someone
> can enlighten me. :)
>
> This code:
> ---
> struct Thing
> {
> int i;
> }
>
> void main()
> {
> t!(Thing.i)();
> }
>
> void t(alias a)()
> {
> return;
> }
> ---
On Friday, August 23, 2013 22:46:34 Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
> Thank you Jonathan, in reality I'm not interested in obtaining
> the current time ('Clock.currTIme' et similia), but only in
> checking some basic behaviour involving already forged times.
>
> Something works, in a limited and constrain
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 01:39:05PM -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:55:21AM +0200, bearophile wrote:
> > Perhaps this thread deserves a D implementation with a small
> > explanation regarding D:
> >
> > http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1kof0q/on_partiallyconstructe
Hello!
I've run into this issue that I don't understand, maybe someone
can enlighten me. :)
This code:
---
struct Thing
{
int i;
}
void main()
{
t!(Thing.i)();
}
void t(alias a)()
{
return;
}
---
fails to compile with: ‘Error: need 'this' for 't' of type 'pure
nothrow @safe voi
On Friday, 23 August 2013 at 19:07:06 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, August 23, 2013 10:39:56 Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
There's a way to use a SysTime at compile-time? It seems
impossible right now for the presence of the TimeZone.
I want to insert some time-related fields in some struct
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:55:21AM +0200, bearophile wrote:
> Perhaps this thread deserves a D implementation with a small
> explanation regarding D:
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1kof0q/on_partiallyconstructed_objects/
>
> (__ctWriteln is not yet available in D.)
[...]
One is
Thanks!
LMB
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Namespace wrote:
> On Friday, 23 August 2013 at 19:57:42 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Is it possible to make an InExpression work with a used-defined type?
>>
>> struct MyCollection { ... }
>>
>> MyCollection mc;
>>
>> auto p =
On Friday, 23 August 2013 at 19:57:42 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros
wrote:
Hello!
Is it possible to make an InExpression work with a used-defined
type?
struct MyCollection { ... }
MyCollection mc;
auto p = 123 in mc;
if (p) { ... }
Thanks!
LMB
Yes, use opBinaryRight:
T* opBinaryRight(stirn
Hello!
Is it possible to make an InExpression work with a used-defined type?
struct MyCollection { ... }
MyCollection mc;
auto p = 123 in mc;
if (p) { ... }
Thanks!
LMB
On Friday, August 23, 2013 10:39:56 Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
> There's a way to use a SysTime at compile-time? It seems
> impossible right now for the presence of the TimeZone.
>
> I want to insert some time-related fields in some structs, but I
> need to have some compile-time check with 'static a
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:22:47AM -0700, Sean Kelly wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2013, at 7:55 AM, Dicebot wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 at 14:43:21 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> >> is there a way for AA to behave same as PHP?
> >
> > I doubt it. This snippet suggests that AA's in PHP are not sim
On Friday, 23 August 2013 at 12:17:08 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
so, here's the situation:
On 2.063.2 why not something like this:
---
import std.typecons;
alias T0 = Typedef!(void*, null, "T0");
alias T1 = Typedef!(void*, null, "T1");
static assert( ! is(T0 == T1));
struct A
{
T0 t;
this
On Jul 31, 2013, at 7:55 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 at 14:43:21 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
>> is there a way for AA to behave same as PHP?
>
> I doubt it. This snippet suggests that AA's in PHP are not simply AA's and do
> additionally track insertion order (or use some simil
H. S. Teoh:
...
Your answer was really too much short, so I have asked you a
question in that enhancement request :-)
Bye,
bearophile
H. S. Teoh:
...
On this subject, I added this request to Bugzilla:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10733
Bye,
bearophile
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 01:54:27PM +0200, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> https://github.com/Kozzi11/Trash/blob/master/util/orderedaa.d
[...]
Neat!
Is a doubly-linked list really necessary for the hash buckets? You could
save on some memory & improve performance slightly if you use a
singly-linked list for
so, here's the situation:
current old code has:
typedef const(void*) T0, T1;
which is of course deprecated.
context that needs to work:
struct A
{
T0 t;
this(T0 init)
{
t = init;
}
}
Also, I need type-safety. is(T0 == T1) *must* be false.
I have a modified Typedef I'
When I do some cleanups, I find some bugs and after fixing them,
my own OrderedAA implementation does not beat builtin hash
anymore :(. But speed is still really near to builtin AA's.
On Thursday, 22 August 2013 at 07:59:05 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 at 14:55:55 UTC, D
https://github.com/Kozzi11/Trash/blob/master/util/orderedaa.d
On Thursday, 22 August 2013 at 08:41:13 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Thursday, 22 August 2013 at 07:59:05 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 at 14:55:55 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 at 14:43:21 UTC,
On 2013-08-23 13:10, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I'd prefer if functionLinkage returned an enum, it's too easy to write
"c" instead of "C" in some generic code and have a static if branch
not taken.
Yeah, that's a good point.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 8/23/13, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-08-23 02:00, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>
>> static assert(functionLinkage!test2 != "C"); // D calling convention
>
> Or Windows, Pascal or C++.
I'd prefer if functionLinkage returned an enum, it's too easy to write
"c" instead of "C" in some generic code
There's a way to use a SysTime at compile-time? It seems
impossible right now for the presence of the TimeZone.
I want to insert some time-related fields in some structs, but I
need to have some compile-time check with 'static assert' here
and there...
Suggestions are welcome, thanks!
Paolo
25 matches
Mail list logo
