On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 06:23:18 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 07:47:16 Paul Jurczak wrote:
I'm writing this rather ugly:
sqrt(cast(float)D) != round(sqrt(cast(float)D)
line and I'm looking for more concise notation without
introducing a meaningless variable
On 2013-08-28 23:28, ixid wrote:
UFCS does not work in this template where the normal function call
syntax will work:
template test(alias fun) {
auto test(T)(T n) {
return n.fun;
}
}
Is this the same as the inability to use UFCS with functions declared in
the same scope as th
On 2013-08-28 23:28, bioinfornatics wrote:
Hi everyone,
yesterday i read an article into a french linux journal that in some
years garbage collector will disapear.
Why ? he explain in very very short as:
--
- Moore's law will be not anymore true
so only memory will conti
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 07:47:16 Paul Jurczak wrote:
> I'm writing this rather ugly:
>
> sqrt(cast(float)D) != round(sqrt(cast(float)D)
>
> line and I'm looking for more concise notation without
> introducing a meaningless variable to hold expression being
> tested. Is there an equivalent of
On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 05:47:43 UTC, Paul Jurczak wrote:
I'm writing this rather ugly:
sqrt(cast(float)D) != round(sqrt(cast(float)D)
line and I'm looking for more concise notation without
introducing a meaningless variable to hold expression being
tested. Is there an equivalent of st
I'm writing this rather ugly:
sqrt(cast(float)D) != round(sqrt(cast(float)D)
line and I'm looking for more concise notation without
introducing a meaningless variable to hold expression being
tested. Is there an equivalent of std.math.trunc(), which would
return fractional portion instead, ma
H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:45:05AM +0200, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
>> H. S. Teoh wrote:
> [...]
>> > Oh, and BTW, are you on Linux 32-bit or 64-bit? Don't know if that
>> > makes a difference, but just in case.
>>
>> 64-bit
> [...]
>
> Maybe try compiling with -m32 and see if
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:45:05AM +0200, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
> H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> > Oh, and BTW, are you on Linux 32-bit or 64-bit? Don't know if that
> > makes a difference, but just in case.
>
> 64-bit
[...]
Maybe try compiling with -m32 and see if it makes a difference? If so,
it m
H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:02:17PM +0200, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
>> I was finally able to create simple test case that probably reproduces
>> the bug (probably, because the stack trace is completely different,
>> but the code that is there is similar). This requires 2 source c
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:10:34PM -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:02:17PM +0200, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
> > I was finally able to create simple test case that probably
> > reproduces the bug (probably, because the stack trace is completely
> > different, but the code that is
Hi everyone,
yesterday i read an article into a french linux journal that in
some years garbage collector will disapear.
Why ? he explain in very very short as:
--
- Moore's law will be not anymore true
so only memory will continue to increase ( static and volatil )
- G
UFCS does not work in this template where the normal function
call syntax will work:
template test(alias fun) {
auto test(T)(T n) {
return n.fun;
}
}
Is this the same as the inability to use UFCS with functions
declared in the same scope as the call? Is there no
On Wednesday, 28 August 2013 at 15:20:34 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
It's hard to tell what your actual requirements are; this
discriminated union might help. It does a bit more than what
you ask for, as it also gives access to /data/, not just
methods; this shouldn't be a problem.
Requirement
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:02:17PM +0200, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
> I was finally able to create simple test case that probably reproduces
> the bug (probably, because the stack trace is completely different,
> but the code that is there is similar). This requires 2 source code
> files:
[...]
> Run
I was finally able to create simple test case that probably reproduces the
bug (probably, because the stack trace is completely different, but the code
that is there is similar). This requires 2 source code files:
main.d:
module main;
// This line must be there - import any module from std cau
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:18:01PM +0200, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 August 2013 at 12:59:19 UTC, Jason den Dulk wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >This code
> >
> > foreach (j; 0..5)
> >writeln(rndGen().take(5));
> > writeln(uniform(0, 1024));
> > foreach (j; 0..5)
> >writeln(rndGen().take
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 05:29:40PM +0200, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
> This is really a cross-domain issue, but I didn't feel like splitting
> it into separate posts would make sense.
>
> I use DMD 2.063.2 on Linux 64-bit.
>
> I have some code in my (non-trivial) application that basically
> corresp
On Tuesday, 27 August 2013 at 12:59:19 UTC, Jason den Dulk wrote:
Hi
This code
foreach (j; 0..5)
writeln(rndGen().take(5));
writeln(uniform(0, 1024));
foreach (j; 0..5)
writeln(rndGen().take(5));
What monarch said, though std.range.refRange() may be of interest:
http://dlang.or
This is really a cross-domain issue, but I didn't feel like splitting it
into separate posts would make sense.
I use DMD 2.063.2 on Linux 64-bit.
I have some code in my (non-trivial) application that basically corresponds
to this:
import std.stdio, std.algorithm, std.array;
void main () {
s
On 08/28/13 06:45, Era Scarecrow wrote:
> On Wednesday, 28 August 2013 at 03:45:06 UTC, Andre Artus wrote:
>> Era,
>>
>> I haven't had time to go through your everything you wrote here but are you
>> looking to create some form of discriminated union (AKA tagged union) using
>> D structs?
>>
>> D
On Wednesday, 28 August 2013 at 00:45:48 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Is it a good idea to add to std.collection.Array a method
similar to:
T[] unsafeRelease() pure nothrow {
return this._data._payload;
}
It's meant to be used as an unsafe hack to call some some
functions that requ
K got a prototype working, I know there's issues with it but for
now it looks simple and acts the way it is suppose to (at least
to the unittest) so... Had to use templates through all the
functions in order for auto ref to work right (hopefully forwards
what it needs...)
/*
//the only th
On Tuesday, 27 August 2013 at 18:32:46 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
May I ask you or somebody else to create a bug about
VariantN.toHash not being considered at all. Thank you! :)
I have filed a bug report for this, and I have placed a work
around in my code, so that's it for now, I suppose. Thank
23 matches
Mail list logo
