On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 06:31:01 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
I'm filing a bug report right now.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11107
On 2013-09-22 15:49, simendsjo wrote:
In 2.063.2, (T!int).stringof == T!(int). In current head, it's T!int.
Even (T!(int)).stringof == T!int.
So is this a regression bug or a bugfix?
Apparently you shouldn't rely on the format of .stringof. See the
comment the ones that follow:
John Carter:
is there a similar mechanism in D? Or should I do...
string foo =
long
string
without
linefeeds
;
Genrally you should do:
string foo = long ~
string ~
without ~
linefeeds;
See also:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
You
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 09:42:59 UTC, bearophile wrote:
John Carter:
is there a similar mechanism in D? Or should I do...
string foo =
long
string
without
linefeeds
;
Genrally you should do:
string foo = long ~
string ~
without ~
linefeeds;
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 07:47:32 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2013-09-20 16:12, simendsjo wrote:
You could of course fix this in a library too.
enum AttributeUsage {
struct_ = 1 0,
class_ = 1 1,
//etc
}
struct attribute { AttributeUsage usage; }
Then the library could give
simendsjo:
Isn't some string replaced with somestring early on?
Yes, unfortunately. And it's something Walter agreed with me to
kill, but nothing has happened...
Bye,
bearophile
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 11:10:07 UTC, bearophile wrote:
simendsjo:
Isn't some string replaced with somestring early on?
Yes, unfortunately. And it's something Walter agreed with me to
kill, but nothing has happened...
Bye,
bearophile
Rationale / link to discussion? I use it
Dicebot:
Rationale / link to discussion? I use it extensively.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
Bye,
bearophile
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 03:51:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Doesn't using immutable there present the same problem as with
the slice? S is no longer assignable. But who would recommend
not
using immutable in this case if you want aarr to be stable. If
you do not use immutable then
On Sunday, 22 September 2013 at 17:26:01 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
You are not alone. I tried to answer some of these questions in
my DConf 2013 talk. I think I have only scratched the surface:
http://dconf.org/talks/cehreli.html
Ali
Ali, thank you for providing great feedback and
On 09/23/2013 06:34 AM, Daniel Davidson wrote:
I've stepped away from D for several months and just getting
back into it.
the first time at D Conf
Actually, I've been thinking about you recently. My apologies for
forgetting your last name. That's why I couldn't recognize you. :(
I will
Code:
import std.stdio;
struct A {
public:
int[4] val;
alias val this;
}
void main()
{
A a;
a.destroy();
}
/d824/f630.d(13): Error: template object.destroy matches more
than one template declaration,
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 19:06:48 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Code:
import std.stdio;
struct A {
public:
int[4] val;
alias val this;
}
void main()
{
A a;
a.destroy();
}
/d824/f630.d(13): Error: template object.destroy matches more
than one
I understand. So, at least it's has interesting behaviour and big
question)
by subject)
Read properties with the @property annotation Applying the
() to a property will simply apply it to the result of the
property. THIS IS A CHANGE OF BEHAVIOR. unittest
{
@property int function() prop1() { return () = 42; }
assert(prop1() == 42);
}
What is about this part?
Code below shows that I would achieve:
/ fire.d
alias void delegate() EventHandler;
class Event(T)
{
private T[] _events;
public void opOpAssign(string op)(T param) if (op == ~)
{
_events ~= param;
}
public void opCall(ParamType ...)(ParamType params)
{
On Saturday, 21 September 2013 at 14:30:19 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
I tried to used Valgrind (Linux) and Dr Memory (Windows)
without success to find a big leak I have in my application.
But both tools can't launch my application without make it
crash.
Do I need do something particular, to have a
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 20:06:20 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
On Saturday, 21 September 2013 at 14:30:19 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
I tried to used Valgrind (Linux) and Dr Memory (Windows)
without success to find a big leak I have in my application.
But both tools can't launch my application without
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 21:35:21 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 20:06:20 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
On Saturday, 21 September 2013 at 14:30:19 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
I tried to used Valgrind (Linux) and Dr Memory (Windows)
without success to find a big leak I have in my
On Monday, September 23, 2013 13:49:59 Daniel Davidson wrote:
But if your concern is client code messing with your member
variable, then
don't give them access to it in the first place.
Not quite as much messing with the member as messing with what it
points to. In the setup - rich data,
Might be related to or even the same issue reported here:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/bug-1005...@http.d.puremagic.com/issues/
This is a Valgrind issue though and not DMD related.
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 19:11:53 UTC, Namespace wrote:
As always. As soon as you wrote it, you've got the solution.
destroy!A(a);
This still seems like it should be worth reporting. I can't
remember... Is partial ordering done between multiple matching
template functions
On Monday, September 23, 2013 22:45:33 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 05:18:38AM +0200, Meta wrote:
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 19:11:53 UTC, Namespace wrote:
As always. As soon as you wrote it, you've got the solution.
destroy!A(a);
This still seems like
23 matches
Mail list logo
