Hello,
I'm trying to use DDOX to generate documentation pages for my
library (dlangui).
dub --build=ddox produces nice output with navigation by modules,
but I cannot find out how to embed some custom navigation pane on
all pages.
E.g. put links to some additional pages like downloads,
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 23:21:05 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 23:14:30 UTC, aldanor wrote:
Could someone please explain why the following doesn't compile
with const qualifier while it does work without it?
/* test.d */
module test;
mixin template Foo() {
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 22:20:53 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:09:28 +
CraigDillabaugh via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
Given the following program:
import std.string;
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
struct FooPasted(Args...){}
class A
{
mixin foo;
void func1() @mark { ... }
void func2( int x, string a ) @mark { ... }
}
must change to:
class A
{
void func1() @mark { ... }
void func2( int x, string a ) @mark { ... }
FooPasted!() func1_mark;
FooPasted!(int,string) func2_mark;
}
so it will be documented? that was the rhetorical question.
Does it need to be? I don't see a reason for anyone to go out
of their way to make the implementation inconsistent. Do you?
At least I would prefer not to rely on undefined behaviour. If we
ever do change the AA implementation
On 12/16/14 10:33 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
so it will be documented? that was the rhetorical question.
Does it need to be? I don't see a reason for anyone to go out of their
way to make the implementation inconsistent. Do you?
At least I would prefer not to rely on undefined behaviour.
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 23:21:44 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Nordlöw:
BTW: Why doesn't aa.byKey.map work?
It currently works.
Bye,
bearophile
My mistake. Now both are at
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/range_ex.d#L527
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 16:08:09 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I can never ever see a reason to implement 2 different ways to
traverse the elements, just to piss off people?
If you make a PR that adds that to documentation, I will pull
it if it makes you feel better. I don't think
On 12/16/14 11:47 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 16:08:09 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I can never ever see a reason to implement 2 different ways to
traverse the elements, just to piss off people?
If you make a PR that adds that to documentation, I will pull it if it
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 16:56:20 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I can do PR for adding
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/range_ex.d#L527
to Phobos.
Were should I put it/them?
I think to be clear, the PR I said I will pull is for the
documentation update. A doc change
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:56:20AM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On 12/16/14 11:47 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 16:08:09 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I can never ever see a reason to implement 2 different ways to
traverse the elements,
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 04:56:10 UTC, Ellery Newcomer
wrote:
If I have a thread that I need to detach from druntime, I can
call thread_detachInstance, but for 2.066, this function does
not exist. Is there any way to do this in 2.066? I notice there
is a thread_detachByAddr, but I'm not
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 17:47:18 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
also rename
byPair to something else in the process).
What about by Python's byItem() and items()?
Would something like this be possible at all? A hypothetical
mixin template
mixin template makeProperty(T, string name, alias func) {
...
}
that could be called like this:
makeProperty!(int, foo, f)
and would generate code like
int @property foo() { return f(); }
On 12/16/2014 10:41 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 04:56:10 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
If I have a thread that I need to detach from druntime, I can call
thread_detachInstance, but for 2.066, this function does not exist. Is
there any way to do this in 2.066? I notice
A partial solution would be something like this:
mixin template makeProperty(T, string name, alias func) {
enum p = makeUnnamedProperty!(T, func);
mixin(enum %s = p;.format(name)); // or alias
}
however now the parent namespace is polluted with p, is there
any way to
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 01:14:36 UTC, aldanor wrote:
A partial solution would be something like this:
mixin template makeProperty(T, string name, alias func) {
enum p = makeUnnamedProperty!(T, func);
mixin(enum %s = p;.format(name)); // or alias
}
however now
To make my C++ binding life easier, I wrote a small string structure [1]
in C++ to use instead of std::string and produced the D declarations for
some of it [2]. (It's not that complicated, I promise.) The important
properties of this struct are that it has a non-trivial copy constructor
and a
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 01:39:07 UTC, anonymous wrote:
But if you want to avoid `p`, just do the substitution:
mixin template makeProperty(T, string name, alias func) {
mixin(enum %s = makeUnnamedProperty!(T,
func);.format(name)); // or alias
}
Thanks, that looks
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 01:49:14 UTC, aldanor wrote:
Wonder if this is doable within a single mixin template without
using makeUnnamedProperty?
Sure, straight forward:
mixin template makeProperty(T, string name, alias func) {
mixin(T %s() @property { return func();
On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 02:12:52 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Sure, straight forward:
mixin template makeProperty(T, string name, alias func) {
mixin(T %s() @property { return func();
}.format(name));
}
Indeed... thanks! Just one thing that I find confusing here --
Is there a phobos way to do eraseInPlace (eg with optimization using
memmove where appropriate) ? (akin to insertInPlace)
Here's what I'd like in phobos:
void eraseInPlace(T)(ref T a, size_t index, size_t n=1)
if(isArray!T){
enum s=typeof(a[0]).sizeof;
auto ptr=a.ptr+index;
import core.stdc.string:memmove;
memmove(ptr,ptr+n,(a.length-(index+n))*s);
a.length-=n;
}
unittest{
auto a=[0,1,2,3,4,5,6];
23 matches
Mail list logo
