I'm not a Mac user and I'm fairly clueless about it. The DMD zip
for OS X contains one executable. I assume it's a 64-bit binary.
Is that true?
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 06:09:16 +0100, Martin Nowak wrote:
> Meanwhile the author of daemonized came up with another idea, using exec
> instead of fork. https://github.com/NCrashed/daemonize/issues/2
ahem. http://forum.dlang.org/post/mc35ap$2dvo$5...@digitalmars.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/18/2015 09:27 PM, Byron Heads wrote:
> I have a medium size daemon application that uses several threads,
> libasync, and daemonize. On windows it runs correctly with GC
> enabled, but on linux the GC causes a deadlock while allocating
> memory.
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:58:16 +, amber wrote:
> On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 23:50:51 UTC, amber wrote:
>> Hi All,
> [snip]
>> Thanks, amber
>
> [edited subject]
>
> Sorry I should add that I'm talking about static ctor/dtor of struct.
>
> The bug I see with 2.067-b2 is this:
>
> 1. stati
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 23:50:51 UTC, amber wrote:
Hi All,
[snip]
Thanks,
amber
[edited subject]
Sorry I should add that I'm talking about static ctor/dtor of
struct.
The bug I see with 2.067-b2 is this:
1. static this() {} called and static fields of struct are
initialised
2. a
Hi All,
I am just wondering if dmd 2067-b2 invokes static this() and
static ~this() differently to 2066.1
I have a strange bug when I use DMD2.067-b2 and it looks a lot
like the static ctor/dtor are run from a separate thread to
main() and unittest{} blocks. When I run under 2066.1 the code
On Friday, February 27, 2015 14:42:17 Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 02/27/2015 02:29 PM, Mark Isaacson wrote:
> > What's the idiomatic way of getting everything *before* the results of a
> > call to find?
> >
> > assert("hello world".find(" world").what_goes_here??? == "hello");
>
On 02/27/2015 02:29 PM, Mark Isaacson wrote:
What's the idiomatic way of getting everything *before* the results of a
call to find?
assert("hello world".find(" world").what_goes_here??? == "hello");
In an article Andrei wrote a few years ago
(http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx…) he m
Ahhh right - forgot about that. Thanks!
Not that it's super important, but the link didn't copy well, so
here's that:
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1407357&seqNum=12
What's the idiomatic way of getting everything *before* the
results of a call to find?
assert("hello world".find(" world").what_goes_here??? == "hello");
In an article Andrei wrote a few years ago
(http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx…) he mentioned a
function like this with the name
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 07:08:26 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
What version of gdb is needed and is that version easy to
install?
Something from late 2014 or newer is the best (7.8.50-cvs or
7.9.50-cvs) as it has got Ian's patches merged, but even an old
stock Debian gdb (7.4.1) works reaso
On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 04:12 +, AJ via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[…]
> I am in the same boat and totally agree. It's tough going from
> the user-experience of IntelliJ IDEA or Visual Studio back to vi
> on OS X with D. There seems to be a large hole in support for D
> debugging outside of
On 02/27/2015 03:04 AM, "Nordlöw" wrote:
Is there a more compact way to describe the opCmp function in the
following struct
Please see:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/lnr99a$vvd$1...@digitalmars.com#post-lnr99a:24vvd:241:40digitalmars.com
Ali
On 2/27/15 6:04 AM, "Nordlöw" wrote:
Is there a more compact way to describe the opCmp function in the
following struct
struct Hit
{
size_t count; // number of walkers that found this node
NWeight rank; // rank (either minimum distance or maximum strength)
auto opCmp(const Hit rh
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 10:49:25 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
2. You construct a transform T(x) that can transform language D
into x.
=> D is proven safe.
Eh:
2. You construct a transform T(x) that can transform programs in
language D into P...
On 2/27/15 3:29 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 16:25:59 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
However, we have an issue here. At any point inside the code, you
could do:
oldcount = count;
And now, there is still potentially a dangling pointer somewhere. This
means every place c
On Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 23:25:22 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 02/26/2015 12:01 PM, Andrey wrote:> HI guys!!!
>
> Have a problem with 3d array memory allocation in next code:
>
> //
> class NeuronNet(T, const uint layersNum)
> {
>
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 11:04:51 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Is there a more compact way to describe the opCmp function in
the following struct
struct Hit
{
size_t count; // number of walkers that found this node
NWeight rank; // rank (either minimum distance or maximum
strength)
Is there a more compact way to describe the opCmp function in the
following struct
struct Hit
{
size_t count; // number of walkers that found this node
NWeight rank; // rank (either minimum distance or maximum
strength)
auto opCmp(const Hit rhs) const
{
if (this.c
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 09:33:43 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
If you can't give an example of unsafety easily, that's already
quite important. Compare to C, where one can provide such an
example easily.
Yes, that is true. Also, if you are conservative in C++ you also
get pretty good safety with
If you can't give an example of unsafety easily, that's already
quite important. Compare to C, where one can provide such an
example easily. If you want to write a mathematical prover, that
won't hurt, though such tools don't need language support, lints
and provers were written even for C.
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 08:34:24 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
@safe is supposed to provide safety, if you can give an example
when it doesn't, you can report a bug. There are indeed bugs in
implementation of safety, like escaping of local variables, but
they are supposed to be fixed eventually.
On Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 20:56:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
Well, but @safe code is not verified either... It is inferred
@safe based on a fixed set of criterions, but not verified. To
verify you need more, and you have to start with strong typing.
@safe is supposed to provide sa
On Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 16:25:59 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
However, we have an issue here. At any point inside the code,
you could do:
oldcount = count;
And now, there is still potentially a dangling pointer
somewhere. This means every place count is used must be
checked. In
25 matches
Mail list logo
