On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 21:35:30 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 19:13:18 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 17:14:29 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 16:09:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 03:30:20 UTC, Kyoji
On 7/31/15 11:34 AM, Hamburger-san wrote:
I was expecting something to break, but I thought it'd be more along the
lines of file paths...
For whatever reason, my compiler really doesn't like it when I try to
access my Array!SomeStruct opIndex function. It gives me the following
Error
Error:
I was expecting something to break, but I thought it'd be more
along the lines of file paths...
For whatever reason, my compiler really doesn't like it when I
try to access my Array!SomeStruct opIndex function. It gives me
the following Error
Error: inout method
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 03:30:20 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
So idk, it feels silly and counterproductive to have D not able
to natively use C libraries. Are we just gonna have to write D
bindings to every notable library out there? Also I don't see
how it'd be problematic, if you don't want a
On 07/26/2015 04:29 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
is this design idea even feasible in principle, or just a bad
idea from the get-go?
As I understand it, it is against one of fundamental D principles:
structs are value types where any copy can be used in place
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 16:09:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 03:30:20 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
So idk, it feels silly and counterproductive to have D not
able to natively use C libraries. Are we just gonna have to
write D bindings to every notable library out there?
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 15:59:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Same version of compiler? Same compiler?
-Steve
Same version of compiler? Same compiler?
-Steve
(just checking now on my linux)
Yeah, same compiler: DMD2
They're both up to date and version: 2.067.1
Both machines are
On 07/31/2015 11:01 AM, Dicebot wrote: On Friday, 31 July 2015 at
17:21:40 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/26/2015 04:29 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
is this design idea even feasible in principle, or just a bad
idea from the get-go?
As I understand it, it is
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 06:01:44PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 17:21:40 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/26/2015 04:29 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
is this design idea even feasible in principle, or just a bad
idea
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 18:13:04 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
To make sure, I didn't mean that I know of structs in Phobos
that behave that way. Although, it would be interesting to
identify them. :)
Ali
Things like Unique, Scoped, RefCounted - pretty much everything
which wraps reference
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 18:23:39 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
It seems that what the language (originally) defines structs to
be, is not entirely consistent with how it has come to be used
(which also entailed later extensions to the struct
definition), and this has been a source of problems.
On 7/31/15 1:21 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Disallowing automatic copying and providing a function comes to mind.
Isn't that what std.algorithm.move is for?
-Steve
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 17:14:29 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 16:09:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 03:30:20 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
So idk, it feels silly and counterproductive to have D not
able to natively use C libraries. Are we just gonna
On Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 15:14:28 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 14:20:41 UTC, Alex wrote:
My father owns a small software company, specialized in market
data products.
www.bccgi.com (in case anyone is interested)
So programming was basically around all my life.
I do a
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 17:21:40 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/26/2015 04:29 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
is this design idea even feasible in principle, or just a bad
idea from the get-go?
As I understand it, it is against one of fundamental D
principles:
On 07/31/2015 12:18 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 7/31/15 1:21 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Disallowing automatic copying and providing a function comes to mind.
Isn't that what std.algorithm.move is for?
-Steve
Sounds great and I like it! :)
Ali
Hi
Coming back after a (too long) break from D programming.
Using DMD 2.067.1:
# cat receive_subclass.d
import std.stdio;
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 07:35:47 UTC, Marek Janukowicz wrote:
So patten matching only works on type of containing variable,
not the type of the object itself. Is it possible to work
around this?
No, it would be very surprising if receive performed a dynamic
downcast, and it's also
On Sunday, 26 July 2015 at 12:16:30 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
Example:
Unique!Random rng = new Random(unpredictableSeed);
rng.take(10).writeln;
My aim by contrast is to _allow_ that kind of use, but render
the original handle empty when it's done.
`take` stores the range,
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 19:13:18 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 17:14:29 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 16:09:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 03:30:20 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
So idk, it feels silly and counterproductive to have
On Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 17:48:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/30/2015 08:14 AM, Chris wrote:
I wonder,
is your father's company listed among those using D? I think
there's a
list somewhere on Wiki, if not we should have one :-)
I don't think they use D yet but the page is here:
//Why expression 'foobar(1);' doesn't work?
void foo()(){}
void bar(int){}
alias foobar = foo;
alias foobar = bar;
void main(){
.foobar(1); //OK
foobar(1); //Error: overload alias 'foo' is not a variable
}
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 10:56:33 UTC, vitus wrote:
//Why expression 'foobar(1);' doesn't work?
void foo()(){}
void bar(int){}
alias foobar = foo;
alias foobar = bar;
void main(){
.foobar(1); //OK
foobar(1); //Error: overload alias 'foo' is not a
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 10:56:33 UTC, vitus wrote:
//Why expression 'foobar(1);' doesn't work?
void foo()(){}
void bar(int){}
alias foobar = foo;
alias foobar = bar;
void main(){
.foobar(1); //OK
foobar(1); //Error: overload alias 'foo' is not a
24 matches
Mail list logo
