On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 17:43:07 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hey guys,
can anyone recommend a more or less production-ready dev
environment for vibe.d on Linux?
I'm evaluating vibe.d against Phoenix (Elixir/Erlang) for a new
project. Today I gave Visual Studio Code a quick shot (with LDC
1.1.1 and
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 17:43:07 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hey guys,
can anyone recommend a more or less production-ready dev
environment for vibe.d on Linux?
I'm evaluating vibe.d against Phoenix (Elixir/Erlang) for a new
project. Today I gave Visual Studio Code a quick shot (with LDC
1.1.1 and
On Thursday, 4 May 2017 at 12:50:02 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
You can try ldc and llvm intrinsics
http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#alloca-instruction
http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-stacksave-intrinsic
Ah, yep!
pragma(LDC_alloca) void* alloca(size_t);
This appears to work with ldc. It would
On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 at 09:04:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I believe that the core problem is that an alias declaration
just aliases a symbol - i.e. it just creates a new name for the
symbol. And as far as I can tell,
alias n2 = x2.n;
is actually equivalent to
alias n2 = member.n;
You can try ldc and llvm intrinsics
http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#alloca-instruction
http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-stacksave-intrinsic
On Sunday, 30 April 2017 at 05:07:31 UTC, 岩倉 澪 wrote:
I've been playing around with using D with no runtime on Linux,
but recently I was thinking it would be nice to have an alloca
implementation. I was thinking I could just bump the stack
pointer (with alignment considerations) but from what I
