On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 17:50:35 Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On 01/24/2018 05:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 25, 2018 00:10:32 Nicholas Wilson via
> > Digitalmars-d-
> >
> > learn wrote:
> >> One pointer for the vtbl, one for the monitor, not sure w
On 01/24/2018 05:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, January 25, 2018 00:10:32 Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
One pointer for the vtbl, one for the monitor, not sure what the
other one is.
The TypeInfo maybe? I'm not sure where that lives.
- Jonathan M Davis
Nested
On Thursday, January 25, 2018 00:10:32 Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> One pointer for the vtbl, one for the monitor, not sure what the
> other one is.
The TypeInfo maybe? I'm not sure where that lives.
- Jonathan M Davis
On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 at 22:27:40 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 at 21:47:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:48:21PM +, Nordlöw via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Why is the memory overhead for a class instance as high as 3
words (24 bytes on 64-bit
On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 at 21:48:21 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Why is the memory overhead for a class instance as high as 3
words (24 bytes on 64-bit systems? I find that annoyingly much
for my knowledge database application. I'm aware of
extern(C++), having one word overhead, but such
extern(C
On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 at 21:47:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:48:21PM +, Nordlöw via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Why is the memory overhead for a class instance as high as 3
words (24 bytes on 64-bit systems? I find that annoyingly much
for my knowledge database
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:48:21PM +, Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Why is the memory overhead for a class instance as high as 3 words (24
> bytes on 64-bit systems? I find that annoyingly much for my knowledge
> database application.
[...]
There's been an attempt to get rid of the
Why is the memory overhead for a class instance as high as 3
words (24 bytes on 64-bit systems? I find that annoyingly much
for my knowledge database application. I'm aware of extern(C++),
having one word overhead, but such extern(C++)-classes cannot use
all of D; I get compilation errors such
On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 19:05:21 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Monday, 22 January 2018 at 19:38:45 UTC, John Gabriele wrote:
On Monday, 22 January 2018 at 15:32:29 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Monday, 22 January 2018 at 15:18:38 UTC, Johann wrote:
Maybe it's due to historical reasons.
It's actua
On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 at 07:55:01 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 00:00:38 UTC, aliak wrote:
[...]
The struct defined inside a scope can mention variables defined
in that scope (e.g. use them in its methods), so it needs a
pointer to the place where those closed
On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 at 14:21:42 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
The spec says that you cannot make an overload set just by
mixing in multiple functions/methods with the same name.
Instead, you have to do it like this:
mixin getter g;
mixin setter!int s;
alias p = g.p;
alias p = s.p;
On 01/24/2018 02:24 PM, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
`Alias this` to mixed in properties does not seem to work, see below. If
you think it should, I'll file an issue. Otherwise: can this be made to
work somehow?
Not supposed to work as it is. The spec says that you cannot make an
overload set just b
Hi,
`Alias this` to mixed in properties does not seem to work, see
below. If you think it should, I'll file an issue. Otherwise: can
this be made to work somehow?
Interestingly, if you uncomment either the mixin getter or setter
(row 36 or 37) and its corresponding use in `main`, then the
r
13 matches
Mail list logo
