On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 20:57:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/10/18 4:02 PM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 19:27:07 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/10/18 3:01 PM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
[...]
Yes, call this function on startup:
import etc.linux : registerMem
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 22:53:25 UTC, kdevel wrote:
extern (C) __gshared bool rt_trapExceptions;
static this ()
{
rt_trapExceptions = false;
}
This will catch exceptions raised in main and in static
constructors that run after this one. However, if you put that
code in t
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 22:31:54 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Turn off rtTrapExceptions
though the command line switch PR is STILL NOT MERGED
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/2035
extern (C) __gshared bool rt_trapExceptions;
static this ()
{
rt_trapExceptions = false
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 21:18:01 UTC, kdevel wrote:
but how do I force the runtime to generate a coredump for real
post-mortem analysis?
Turn off rtTrapExceptions
though the command line switch PR is STILL NOT MERGED
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/2035
come on, people.
On 7/10/18 5:18 PM, kdevel wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 21:09:23 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
[...]
As far as the OS is concerned, a[2 .. $] is within the process memory
limit.
Of course, that's an out of bounds access, so the compiler or the
bounds check *should* complain.
It com
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 19:27:07 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
import etc.linux : registerMemoryErrorHandler;
Needs to be:
import etc.linux.memoryerror : registerMemoryErrorHandler;
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 21:09:23 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
[...]
As far as the OS is concerned, a[2 .. $] is within the process
memory limit.
Of course, that's an out of bounds access, so the compiler or
the bounds check *should* complain.
It complains at runtime
> ./dumpme2
On 7/10/18 5:01 PM, kdevel wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 20:10:54 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 19:01:22 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
[...]
Run the program in a debugger, or run `ulimit -c unlimited` to enable
core dumps [...]
Works for null ptr deref but how do I enf
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 20:10:54 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 19:01:22 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
[...]
Run the program in a debugger, or run `ulimit -c unlimited` to
enable core dumps [...]
Works for null ptr deref but how do I enforce core dumps in this
code:
du
On 7/10/18 4:02 PM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 19:27:07 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 7/10/18 3:01 PM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Is it possible to change run-time behaviour of null-class
dereferencing, on Linux, so that it gives some other diagnostics than:
Program exited w
On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 18:47:10 UTC, Jordi Gutiérrez
Hermoso wrote:
I'm specifically thinking of the GNU Octave codebase:
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/file/@
It's a fairly old and complicated C++ codebase. I would like to
see if I could slowly introduce some D in it, anywhere
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 19:01:22 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Is it possible to change run-time behaviour of null-class
dereferencing, on Linux, so that it gives some other
diagnostics than:
Program exited with code -11
Does DMD and LDC provide different alternatives here?
On a Systemd syste
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 19:01:22 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Is it possible to change run-time behaviour of null-class
dereferencing, on Linux, so that it gives some other
diagnostics than:
Run the program in a debugger, or run `ulimit -c unlimited` to
enable core dumps so you can run a debug
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 19:27:07 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/10/18 3:01 PM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Is it possible to change run-time behaviour of null-class
dereferencing, on Linux, so that it gives some other
diagnostics than:
Program exited with code -11
Does DMD and LDC provide
On 7/10/18 3:01 PM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Is it possible to change run-time behaviour of null-class dereferencing,
on Linux, so that it gives some other diagnostics than:
Program exited with code -11
Does DMD and LDC provide different alternatives here?
Yes, call this function on startup:
impo
On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 19:57:55 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I'm not sure adding D to the GNU Octave code base is
necessarily the biggest value add...
I'm daydreaming of being able to rewrite all of Octave in D. I
just was trying to think of where to start.
Is it possible to change run-time behaviour of null-class
dereferencing, on Linux, so that it gives some other diagnostics
than:
Program exited with code -11
Does DMD and LDC provide different alternatives here?
On 7/10/18 10:34 AM, Timoses wrote:
How do I create an inout object with template parameters?
Take following code:
import std.stdio;
import std.traits;
struct S
{
int[] arr;
}
interface I
{
inout(I) opIndex(size_t idx) inout;
}
c
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 14:58:42 UTC, vino.B wrote:
Hi Alex,
I am getting the output as tuples of multiple arrays, but the
requirement is to get the all the tuple in a single array like
the below so that we can perform sorting and printing the
output is easy.
Something along the way
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 14:50:53 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 14:38:03 UTC, vino.B wrote:
Hi Alex,
The reason the I am storing the output of "PFresult.toRange"
to another array "rData" is that the output of the
PFresult.toRange is different each time we execute the
cod
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 14:38:03 UTC, vino.B wrote:
Hi Alex,
The reason the I am storing the output of "PFresult.toRange"
to another array "rData" is that the output of the
PFresult.toRange is different each time we execute the
code.(Data is correct) but the way the it output is differ
On Monday, 9 July 2018 at 18:07:49 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Monday, 9 July 2018 at 17:26:30 UTC, vino.B wrote:
Request Help:
void process(alias coRoutine, T...)(Array!string Dirlst, T
params)
{
ReturnType!coRoutine rData; / This line is not
working
alias scRType = typeof(coRout
How do I create an inout object with template parameters?
Take following code:
import std.stdio;
import std.traits;
struct S
{
int[] arr;
}
interface I
{
inout(I) opIndex(size_t idx) inout;
}
On Saturday, 7 July 2018 at 11:56:40 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
void bar (T ...) (T args) if (T.length == 0)
{
return;
[...]
}
void bar (T ...) (T args) if (T.length > 0)
{
writeln (args [0]);
return bar (args [1 .. $]);
}
This is a version without a se
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 07:24:43 MDT WebFreak001 via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 13:14:24 UTC, Piotr Mitana wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've recently started building a little REST application on
> > vibe.d. I decided to use the "database" library, as I need to
> > comm
On 7/10/18 7:38 AM, kdevel wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 00:11:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 7/7/18 7:28 AM, kdevel wrote:
It appears not to be possible to use static if in "guard clause
style" as in
void bar (T ...) (T args)
{
static if (args.length == 0)
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 13:14:24 UTC, Piotr Mitana wrote:
Hello,
I've recently started building a little REST application on
vibe.d. I decided to use the "database" library, as I need to
communicate with the PostgreSQL instance.
During the compilation I see the deprecation warning:
"Non-
Hello,
I've recently started building a little REST application on
vibe.d. I decided to use the "database" library, as I need to
communicate with the PostgreSQL instance.
During the compilation I see the deprecation warning:
"Non-@safe methods are deprecated in REST interfaces"
So two questi
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 12:10:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 05:38:33 MDT kdevel via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I would like to suggest an extension of the language by
introducing
static return Expression_opt;
which shall have the effect of a return plus tha
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 12:05:11 UTC, kdevel wrote:
On Saturday, 7 July 2018 at 13:12:59 UTC, Alex wrote:
The site you cited for the guard clause above (c2.com)
works at runtime.
?
static if works at compile team and only inserts code into the
final code for run-time depending on the co
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 05:38:33 MDT kdevel via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I would like to suggest an extension of the language by
> introducing
>
> static return Expression_opt;
>
> which shall have the effect of a return plus that the remaining
> lines in the current block are treated as
On Saturday, 7 July 2018 at 13:12:59 UTC, Alex wrote:
The site you cited for the guard clause above (c2.com)
works at runtime.
?
The intention is to shorten the paths inside a function, I
think. Therefore, a static "guard clause" is a contradiction,
if I understand it correctly.
The term "
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 05:52:59 MDT kdevel via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Saturday, 7 July 2018 at 13:03:32 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
> > void func() {
> >
> > return;
> >
> > func2();
> >
> > }
> >
> > Which is clearly an error. Hence why you need to add else block.
>
> There is
On Saturday, 7 July 2018 at 13:03:32 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
void func() {
return;
func2();
}
Which is clearly an error. Hence why you need to add else block.
There is no error in this generated code because func2 is
unreachable. That there is a state/stage during compil
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 00:11:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/7/18 7:28 AM, kdevel wrote:
It appears not to be possible to use static if in "guard
clause style" as in
void bar (T ...) (T args)
{
static if (args.length == 0)
return;
writeln (args [0
On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 04:03:04 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 02:49:27 UTC, Mike wrote:
My approaches are right now for -betterC to be a filthy hack to
get it working quick, and I still have a bunch of ways I want
to improve the implementation and compiler interface i
36 matches
Mail list logo
