On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 17:50:17 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
What the C compiler is doing is storing it as data, and then
storing the symbol to point at the first element in the data.
When you use const char* in D, it's expecting a *pointer* to be
stored at that address, not the
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 17:18:58 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 06:20:09 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
Hi all,
...
When linking to this library from D, I have declared it as:
extern __gshared const(char)* seq_nt16_str;
***But this segfaults when I treat it like an
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 06:20:09 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
Hi all,
I am linking to a C library which defines a symbol,
const char seq_nt16_str[] = "=ACMGRSVTWYHKDBN";
In the C sources, this is an array of 16 bytes (17 I guess,
because it is written as a string).
In the C headers, it
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 07:38:54 UTC, Marcin wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/master/samples/listener.d
Can some one add more comment to that example?
I need to make code that connects to local application, very
similar to this.
Assumptions:
1. Create an application that
On 8/31/18 2:20 AM, James Blachly wrote:
Hi all,
I am linking to a C library which defines a symbol,
const char seq_nt16_str[] = "=ACMGRSVTWYHKDBN";
In the C sources, this is an array of 16 bytes (17 I guess, because it
is written as a string).
In the C headers, it is listed as extern
On 8/31/18 1:18 PM, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 06:20:09 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
Hi all,
I am linking to a C library which defines a symbol,
const char seq_nt16_str[] = "=ACMGRSVTWYHKDBN";
In the C sources, this is an array of 16 bytes (17 I guess, because it
is
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 12:52:17 UTC, bauss wrote:
In reality you're micro-optimizing something that doesn't
require it.
I think you misunderstood. I wasn't trying to optimize, I was
looking for a general way to iterate.
I can't see the benefit other than added complexity.
I just
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 06:20:09 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
Hi all,
I am linking to a C library which defines a symbol,
const char seq_nt16_str[] = "=ACMGRSVTWYHKDBN";
In the C sources, this is an array of 16 bytes (17 I guess,
because it is written as a string).
In the C headers, it
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 12:52:17 UTC, bauss wrote:
So basically ... Instead of copying the value, you're just
copying the address.
I can't see the benefit other than added complexity.
I assume a benefit could be observed if you are copying a large
struct instead of an int.
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 10:34:33 UTC, Sobaya wrote:
On Monday, 27 August 2018 at 12:47:45 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Monday, 27 August 2018 at 09:57:18 UTC, Sobaya wrote:
On Monday, 27 August 2018 at 09:41:34 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Monday, 27 August 2018 at 08:25:14 UTC, Sobaya wrote:
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 09:59:20 UTC, Dukc wrote:
For me, it seems that for generality you should always add ref
into foreach loop variable. The reason is this:
import std.experimental.all;
struct NoCopies
{ @disable this(this);
int payload;
}
void main()
{ auto range = new
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 12:21:48 UTC, aliak wrote:
auto ToUnderlyingType(alias a)() {
return cast(OriginalType!(typeof(a)))a;
}
void print(T...)(T args) {
writeln(staticMap!(ToUnderlyingType, args));
}
Oohhh. So easy! Killed 2 days - and templates and mixins tried...
And the
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 10:51:51 UTC, Andrey wrote:
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 12:04:26 UTC, vit wrote:
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 11:34:36 UTC, Andrey wrote:
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 11:09:40 UTC, vit wrote:
[...]
I want to create a reusable template for this purpose.
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 12:04:26 UTC, vit wrote:
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 11:34:36 UTC, Andrey wrote:
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 11:09:40 UTC, vit wrote:
[...]
I want to create a reusable template for this purpose.
Why I can't use "staticMap" so that compiler it self would
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 21:40:40 UTC, Everlast wrote:
On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 00:10:42 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
[...]
This is not true! You claim that I'm making a blanket statement
about what mathematicians would view then you do the same.
[...]
If ... implies "an arbitrary
For me, it seems that for generality you should always add ref
into foreach loop variable. The reason is this:
import std.experimental.all;
struct NoCopies
{ @disable this(this);
int payload;
}
void main()
{ auto range = new NoCopies[20];
foreach(const ref el; range)
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/master/samples/listener.d
Can some one add more comment to that example?
I need to make code that connects to local application, very
similar to this.
Assumptions:
1. Create an application that listens to arguments.
2. Create an application that will send
Hi all,
I am linking to a C library which defines a symbol,
const char seq_nt16_str[] = "=ACMGRSVTWYHKDBN";
In the C sources, this is an array of 16 bytes (17 I guess,
because it is written as a string).
In the C headers, it is listed as extern const char
seq_nt16_str[];
When linking to
18 matches
Mail list logo
