On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 01:14:37AM +, kinke via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 at 00:48:03 UTC, Joe wrote:
> > I'd like to know if the lack of double/float versions of 'log',
> > 'log10', etc. are intentional, i.e., there's some rationale behind
> > it, or an oversig
On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 at 00:48:03 UTC, Joe wrote:
I'd like to know if the lack of double/float versions of 'log',
'log10', etc. are intentional, i.e., there's some rationale
behind it, or an oversight.
Just laziness or people still thinking that you don't lose any
performance by compu
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:48:03AM +, Joe via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> I'd like to know if the lack of double/float versions of 'log',
> 'log10', etc. are intentional, i.e., there's some rationale behind it,
> or an oversight.
It's an oversight. Thanks for bringing it to our attenti
I've discovered that the 'log' function as well several similar
functions are only defined as taking a real argument and
returning a real, unlike most other std.math functions, which
have triple definitions (also supporting double and float types).
This created a problem when I tried compiling
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:46:31PM +, aliak via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you guys have any strategies for dealing with templates when they
> have more than one optional parameter?
>
> E.g let's say we have a type C that takes three parameters
>
> struct B(T) {}
> struct C(str
Hi,
Do you guys have any strategies for dealing with templates when
they have more than one optional parameter?
E.g let's say we have a type C that takes three parameters
struct B(T) {}
struct C(string name, T, string desc) {}
And let's say I want T and desc to be optional and T should be o
On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 2:18:15 AM MDT Laurent Tréguier via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Monday, 29 October 2018 at 21:50:32 UTC, aliak wrote:
> > Hi, so if you have this piece of code:
> >
> > struct C {
> >
> > void f() {
> >
> > string[] others;
> > const string[] restArgs;
>
On Sunday, 13 March 2016 at 19:28:57 UTC, karabuta wrote:
Gtk3 from python3 has got I nice book with examples that are
not so advanced but enough to get you doing real work(from a
beginner point of view). GtkD seem to have changed the API
structure compared to python3 Gtk3 and the demo examples
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 at 11:23:48 UTC, aliak wrote:
Guess I could do that. But would there be a difference if I
just declared the restArgs as non const then? Given the
objective is "set this var to point to this thing and not allow
it to be set to point to anything else".
The difference
On Monday, 29 October 2018 at 22:05:16 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
What exactly are you trying to accomplish? I.e., what
semantics do you want from modifying restArgs?
Trying to set restArgs to point to some data but only set it
once. Would require some sort of control flow analysis on the
part
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 at 08:18:15 UTC, Laurent Tréguier
wrote:
On Monday, 29 October 2018 at 21:50:32 UTC, aliak wrote:
Hi, so if you have this piece of code:
struct C {
void f() {
string[] others;
const string[] restArgs;
foreach (i, arg; args) {
if (isValidArg(arg))
On Monday, 29 October 2018 at 22:12:24 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
Use a lambda:
const string[] restArgs = () {
foreach(i, arg; args) {
if (isValidArg(arg)) {
return args[i+1 .. $];
}
others ~= arg;
}
}();
That works.
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 at 10:46:35 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 at 10:30:48 UTC, John Burton wrote:
I want to do some graphics using direct3d11 on windows.
There are some bindings that I used once before
https://github.com/evilrat666/directx-d
However they are marke
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 at 10:30:48 UTC, John Burton wrote:
I want to do some graphics using direct3d11 on windows.
There are some bindings that I used once before
https://github.com/evilrat666/directx-d
However they are marked as [discontinued]
While I'm sure they will continue to work so
I want to do some graphics using direct3d11 on windows.
There are some bindings that I used once before
https://github.com/evilrat666/directx-d
However they are marked as [discontinued]
While I'm sure they will continue to work so wouldn't worry about
using this I wonder if there are any other
On Thursday, 25 October 2018 at 21:00:46 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 25 October 2018 at 19:56:18 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
The current behavior of the compiler is quite the opposite of
those "same as" above.
Yeah, I guess I am maybe selectively reading the spec in light
of the i
On Monday, 29 October 2018 at 21:50:32 UTC, aliak wrote:
Hi, so if you have this piece of code:
struct C {
void f() {
string[] others;
const string[] restArgs;
foreach (i, arg; args) {
if (isValidArg(arg)) {
restArgs = args[i + 1 .. $];
break;
}
o
17 matches
Mail list logo
