On 3/22/19 9:24 AM, Alex wrote:
On Friday, 22 March 2019 at 12:08:39 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
First, how do we deal with toString, std.format, writeln, etc. with
un-copyable objects, when it is only a member that is uncopyable? In
my case I got around this by creating a pointer and moving
On Friday, 22 March 2019 at 16:40:31 UTC, number wrote:
writeln("The text entry box holds: ",
fontButton.getFontName());
Again, thank you for catching typos.
On Friday, 22 March 2019 at 13:58:48 UTC, number wrote:
I think it works in this scenario because private in D works on
the module/file level.
By gar, you're right. I hadn't even looked into this because I
assumed it was the same as PHP and C++.
Thanks for pointing this out.
On Friday, 22 March 2019 at 13:17:23 UTC, number wrote:
Not sure about .md or file version, but there are no links in
the actual blog post:
http://gtkdcoding.com/2019/02/15/0010-checkbutton.html
It's fixed now.
and apparently also not in in this .md file:
I've searched a lot at it should be working at least on linux,
but apparently is not or I'm doing something totally wrong..
Our use case is to call shared D library from C# (.Net Core) and
from different threads.
What I've read about this, is that foreign thread should be
registered by
On Friday, 22 March 2019 at 11:00:32 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Friday, 22 March 2019 at 10:51:58 UTC, Sobaya wrote:
[...]
As far as I know different to windows, linus will not search
current working directory for a.so. if this is the issue here,
you have different possibilities. You could
On Tuesday, 19 March 2019 at 12:33:08 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
Tuesday again. This blog post is about invisible Entry widgets
and the FontButton. Really stimulating stuff and you'll find it
at:
http://gtkdcoding.com/2019/03/19/0019-disappearing-text-entry.html
A little copy/paste glitch..
On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 14:44:59 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
As a side note, in 0004 you say:
We can still call the constructor, even though strictly
speaking it’s private, because by using ‘new MyButton()’ the
constructor isn’t being called directly, but as part of a
lower-level process
On Friday, 22 March 2019 at 12:08:39 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
I have a struct S with member containers.UnrolledList [1].
UnrolledList is @disable this(this), but this unfortunately
makes my struct S also un-copyable, which now breaks some of my
debugging statements which rely on toString, as
On Friday, 22 March 2019 at 11:19:56 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
Hmm... I'm not sure why the links didn't show up for you. I
just double-checked and they're in the .md file and version of
the file has been in place for at least 10 days.
Still, no harm in having them on this forum as well.
Thanks
Also forgot...
It's Friday again and time for another gtkDcoding blog post. In
today's episode, we slap an image onto a Timmy the Button's face,
then do a switch up to keep poor Timmy off balance. You can tune
in here:
http://gtkdcoding.com/2019/03/22/0020-image-buttons.html
I have a struct S with member containers.UnrolledList [1]. UnrolledList
is @disable this(this), but this unfortunately makes my struct S also
un-copyable, which now breaks some of my debugging statements which rely
on toString, as writeln, format, etc. all copy the object. This leaves
me in
On Thursday, 21 March 2019 at 21:34:26 UTC, Michelle Long wrote:
I'd suggest adding pictures!
Oops! Forgot to say...
I get why you want images. You were asking about animation the
other day, so obviously you're a visual artist. So am I and I
know how drawn I am to imagery and I imagine
On Thursday, 21 March 2019 at 21:34:26 UTC, Michelle Long wrote:
I'd suggest adding pictures! It's very easy to take a screen
shot and not much harder to link them and they offer far more
interest.
You're the second person to suggest this, so I'll explain my
reasoning. I assure you, it's
On Friday, 22 March 2019 at 10:02:24 UTC, number wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 14:44:59 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
another post on the gtkDcoding blog.
0013 says
... with *setTooltipText()*.
Maybe a formatting error?
Yup, it was. I'm still trying to break the habit of putting
optional
On Thursday, 21 March 2019 at 20:49:07 UTC, number wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 14:44:59 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
another post on the gtkDcoding blog.
0010 says
Here’s the code file.
Here’s a second code file for you.
but no links. I guess it's
On Friday, 22 March 2019 at 10:51:58 UTC, Sobaya wrote:
I fail to load the shared library created in a specific
situation, but I do not know the cause.
a.d
import b.d
b.d
static this() {}
for above 2 files, I created shared library by following
command.
dmd a.d -shared
I fail to load the shared library created in a specific
situation, but I do not know the cause.
a.d
import b.d
b.d
static this() {}
for above 2 files, I created shared library by following command.
dmd a.d -shared -of=a.so
And I ran below code, but the library is not
On Thursday, 21 March 2019 at 16:54:01 UTC, Roman Sztergbaum
wrote:
I would like to get rid of the "ubytes[256]" because I do not
know the size of the data that is comming, I would like to read
the entire buffer that I send at once. Can someone point me?
If you do not know the size of the
On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 14:44:59 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
another post on the gtkDcoding blog.
0013 says
... with *setTooltipText()*.
Maybe a formatting error?
Thanks again for the Blog.
FYI: I also had dropped a note in some of the previous gtkdcoding
forum threads
20 matches
Mail list logo
