from my project root directory
dub add arsd-official
This is added to dub.json
"arsd-official": "~>4.0.3"
just run the project gives
Fetching arsd-official 4.0.3 (getting selected version)...
Performing "debug" build using C:\D\dmd2\windows\bin\dmd.exe for
x86_64.
arsd-official:cgi 4.0.3:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 21:34:35 UTC, Dennis wrote:
Except that e.g. -2 - int.max underflows to int.max suggesting
that int.max < -2.
Eh yeah, it would be something you should check in opCmp.
But this is how it is actually implemented on the processor
itself, just the cpu happens to
On 10/16/2019 02:34 PM, Dennis wrote:
> Except that e.g. -2 - int.max underflows to int.max suggesting that
> int.max < -2.
Timon had corrected me on that point a while back, so I had added the
following warning at
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/operator_overloading.html#ix_operator_overloading.
On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 20:07:10 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
Notice that the docs say "a negative value" rather than -1
specifically. That's because the implementation for integers an
be as simple as
return a - b; // if b > a, you get a negative value
Except that e.g. -2 - int.max und
On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 19:25:18 UTC, DNoob wrote:
I'm just learning D, so it's very possible that I'm missing a
more appropriate function that exists elsewhere, but basically
I found today that while I could easily write a cmp function
that worked for everything, the one in std.algori
On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 19:25:18 UTC, DNoob wrote:
I'm just learning D, so it's very possible that I'm missing a
more appropriate function that exists elsewhere, but basically
I found today that while I could easily write a cmp function
that worked for everything, the one in std.algori
I'm just learning D, so it's very possible that I'm missing a
more appropriate function that exists elsewhere, but basically I
found today that while I could easily write a cmp function that
worked for everything, the one in std.algorithm doesn't seem to:
import std.stdio, std.algorithm;
pure
On 2019-10-16 05:30, Joel wrote:
Everything seems to be working again - yay!
Great. If you see a lot of warnings when linking, I have a PR for that [1].
[1] https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/10476
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2019-10-15 09:06, John Colvin wrote:
And all the other ones in my example that access members without an
instance that also compile?
There's something pretty strange about the rules here.
The thing is that it should be possible to access a non-static member
without an instance because it
On 10/16/19 6:40 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 17/10/2019 4:29 AM, drug wrote:
struct Foo
{
this(ref const(Foo) other) {}
this(const(Foo) other) {}
}
I'm trying to update dmd version and starting from 2.086 my code
doesn't compile due to the error above. What is the reason of that?
On Friday, 11 October 2019 at 11:38:27 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2019-10-10 20:12, Robert M. Münch wrote:
I have two project I want to compile and both times get this
error:
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"_dyld_enumerate_tlv_storage", referenced from:
__d_dyld_getTLSRa
On 17/10/2019 4:29 AM, drug wrote:
struct Foo
{
this(ref const(Foo) other) {}
this(const(Foo) other) {}
}
I'm trying to update dmd version and starting from 2.086 my code doesn't
compile due to the error above. What is the reason of that?
Copy constructors were added (sort of like p
struct Foo
{
this(ref const(Foo) other) {}
this(const(Foo) other) {}
}
I'm trying to update dmd version and starting from 2.086 my code doesn't
compile due to the error above. What is the reason of that? Is it
temporarily situation?
On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 07:46:42 UTC, Antonio Corbi
wrote:
Hope this helps.
Thanks, Antonio. I'll check this out.
I'll work up a demo based on this stuff and put it in the
gtkdcoding queue.
I'm trying to write multi-threaded code that uses mutexes,
condition variables and atomics but I've got confused how to do
this correctly. Everything I found so far include a lot of
casting to/from shared even for the objects that are supposed to
be shared (like mutex and condition variable).
On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 10:09:51 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Do we want to be able to catch things in their 'before' state?
Or is it a bug?
The 'before' and 'after' are implementation details showing up as
a result of underspecification.
Module level declarations are supposed to be
On Tuesday, 15 October 2019 at 19:50:33 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2019 at 19:19:58 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
You would expect 2 to print `tuple(a)` as well, but it
doesn't. Don't know if it is a bug.
Any time you use a construct that mutates the AST (template
mixin, st
On Tuesday, 15 October 2019 at 22:02:35 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2019 at 20:03:00 UTC, Ron Tarrant wrote:
...
Do you have links for these?
thanks! :p
both the packages can simply be found on dub:
https://code.dlang.org/search?q=glade
Not sure if there are other ways
18 matches
Mail list logo
