On Monday, 11 November 2019 at 16:20:59 UTC, bauss wrote:
If you wanted to follow the standard of D then you didn't need
a string type. Since it doesn't really exist in D.
string is just an alias for immutable(char)[]
And that is why std.exception.assumeUnique converts char[] to
string AKA
On Monday, November 11, 2019 12:17:37 PM MST Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> Recently I got my first surprise with our use of D. The symptom
> was that two local variables in two different functions appeared
> to be sharing data.
>
> A simplified example is shown below (the origina
On Monday, 11 November 2019 at 19:17:37 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
Recently I got my first surprise with our use of D. The symptom
was that two local variables in two different functions
appeared to be sharing data.
A simplified example is shown below (the original was machine
translated from
Recently I got my first surprise with our use of D. The symptom
was that two local variables in two different functions appeared
to be sharing data.
A simplified example is shown below (the original was machine
translated from Pascal and involved templates and various levels
of indirection).
Hi,
I am trying to create a simple DLL and a simple app that loads it
on Linux with end goal of having it work on MacOS.
Everything seems to work fine with DMD, but when I use LDC2 to
build the loader, I don't get the `shared static this()` and
`~this` called when I `dlopen()` and `dlclose()
On Monday, 11 November 2019 at 16:59:57 UTC, Q. Schroll wrote:
What's the difference of
is(C R == Complex!R)
to
is(C == Complex!R, R)
then?
Nothing, they do the same thing.
(I'm of the opinion that the first one should actually be illegal
- I thought it was until I checked for this th
On Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 13:26:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 12:30:46 UTC, René Heldmaier
wrote:
The part i don't understand is "is(C R == Complex!R)".
What does that mean?
That's checking the if the template argument C is a case of
Complex!R, while at th
On Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 22:03:03 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 at 03:56:56 UTC, lili wrote:
Hi:
why writeln need GC?
Upon this post, I thought writing a gc-free writeln would be a
good learning practice. Although it is not a feature-complete
one, it was
On Monday, 11 November 2019 at 13:10:44 UTC, berni44 wrote:
(a normal delegate seems to be an Object somehow, though).
The .ptr method is a pointer to the data associated with the
delegate. It might be an object (class or struct) or it might be
a memory block (for local variables on the stac
While debugging phobos I came across some stuff I don't
understand. A small example:
void foo(void* p)
{
Object o = cast(Object) p;
ClassInfo oc = typeid(o);
}
class Bar
{
void some_func(int i) {}
void do_something(void delegate(int) d)
{
// is it possible to check
10 matches
Mail list logo
