On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:55:51 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:00:46 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 02:08:48 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 19:04:45 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
@fastmath private double sd0(T)(Slice!(T*, 1) flatMatrix
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:00:46 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 02:08:48 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 19:04:45 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
@fastmath private double sd0(T)(Slice!(T*, 1) flatMatrix)
@fastmath shouldn't be really used with summation al
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 20:37:53 UTC, Marcone wrote:
import std: isUpper, writeln;
void main(){
writeln(isUpper('A'));
}
Why I get this error? How can I use isUpper()?
Additionally to the other answers telling you how to fix it, it's
important to know why it happens in the first
Hello everyone!
I try to compile this recipe with dmd (2.089.0), ldc2 (1.18.0):
https://wiki.dlang.org/Using_string_mixins_for_logging
but get the same error:
mixin_log.d(64): Error: basic type expected, not __FUNCTION__
mixin_log.d(64): Error: declaration expected, not __FUNCTION__
in that par
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 15:48:59 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 14:33:47 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/14/20 10:22 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The documentation needs updating, it should say "parameters
are added sequentially" or something like that, instead
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:57:21 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:55:51 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:00:46 UTC, tastyminerals
wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 02:08:48 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 19:04:45 UTC, tastyminerals
wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 07:07:55 UTC, Vitalii wrote:
Hello everyone!
I try to compile this recipe with dmd (2.089.0), ldc2 (1.18.0):
https://wiki.dlang.org/Using_string_mixins_for_logging
but get the same error:
mixin_log.d(64): Error: basic type expected, not __FUNCTION__
mixin_log.d(64)
Many thanks!
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 07:34:59 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:57:21 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:55:51 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:00:46 UTC, tastyminerals
wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 02:08:48 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 23:10:28 UTC, Max Haughton wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 21:58:49 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I have written something which may or may not be novel and I’m
wondering about how to distribute it to as many users as
possible, hoping others will find it useful. What’s t
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 02:25:42 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 21:58:49 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
Does anyone know if this has already been published by someone
else?
https://github.com/libmir/mir-core/blob/master/source/mir/utility.d#L29
We test LDC and DMC. CI needs an
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 05:57:56 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
[snip]
Here is a (WIP) project as of now.
Line 160 in
https://github.com/tastyminerals/mir_benchmarks_2/blob/master/source/basic_ops.d
std of [60, 60] matrix 0.0389492 (> 0.001727)
std of [300, 300] matrix 1.03592 (> 0.043452)
s
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 07:01:34 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 20:37:53 UTC, Marcone wrote:
[...]
Additionally to the other answers telling you how to fix it,
it's important to know why it happens in the first place:
[...]
Without reading this very explanation,
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 11:23:00 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 05:57:56 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
[snip]
Here is a (WIP) project as of now.
Line 160 in
https://github.com/tastyminerals/mir_benchmarks_2/blob/master/source/basic_ops.d
std of [60, 60] matrix 0.0389492 (
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 11:26:19 UTC, 9il wrote:
[snip]
@fmamath private double sd(T)(Slice!(T*, 1) flatMatrix)
@fastmath violates all summation algorithms except `"fast"`.
The same bug is in the original author's post.
I hadn't realized that @fmamath was the problem, rather than
@fa
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 11:25:34 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 07:01:34 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 20:37:53 UTC, Marcone wrote:
[...]
Additionally to the other answers telling you how to fix it,
it's important to know why it happens in the fi
On 2020-07-12 18:36, Per Nordlöw wrote:
The line
dflags "-linker=gold" platform="linux-ldc" # use GNU gold linker
in dub.sdl
enables me to change linker for LDC.
Is it possible to choose a specific linker for DMD aswell in a similar way?
I only find the flag `-L` that sets flags but no linke
On 2020-07-14 05:33, Boris Carvajal wrote:
Can you try passing -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 to g++ and
-version=_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX98_ABI to dmd.
That comes from: https://dlang.org/changelog/2.088.0.html#std_string
C++11 ABI is currently not supported.
I based on previous messages and the usage
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 11:37:23 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 11:26:19 UTC, 9il wrote:
[snip]
@fmamath private double sd(T)(Slice!(T*, 1) flatMatrix)
@fastmath violates all summation algorithms except `"fast"`.
The same bug is in the original author's post.
I hadn
On 2020-07-15 04:20, 9il wrote:
No. Usually, a DUB package supports a range of C library version or just
a fixes set of C API. The version behavior of the dub package is up to
you. Usually, D API changes more frequently than the underlying C library.
If you support a specific version of the C A
On 2020-07-14 23:58, Cecil Ward wrote:
What’s the best way to publish a D routine ?
As others have already said, on GitHub. Then as a Dub package as well [1].
[1] https://code.dlang.org
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 11:41:35 UTC, 9il wrote:
[snip]
Ah, no, my bad! You write @fmamath, I have read it as
@fastmath. @fmamath is OK here.
I've mixed up @fastmath and @fmamath as well. No worries.
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 09:31:27 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 23:10:28 UTC, Max Haughton wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 21:58:49 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I have written something which may or may not be novel and
I’m wondering about how to distribute it to as many
I recently noticed
pragma(inline, true)
which looks extremely useful. A couple of questions :
1. Is this cross-compiler compatible?
2. Can I declare a function in one module and have it _inlined_
in another module at the call site?
I’m looking to write functions that expand to approx one
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 13:38:34 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I recently noticed
pragma(inline, true)
which looks extremely useful. A couple of questions :
1. Is this cross-compiler compatible?
2. Can I declare a function in one module and have it _inlined_
in another module at the call si
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 11:38:47 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
There's an environment variable "CC" that can be used to select
which C compiler is used. Is there any equivalence for
selecting the linker, "LD" perhaps?
You normally just add -fuse-ld=gold to the C compiler cmdline,
e.g., via
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 13:38:34 UTC, Cecil Ward wrote:
I recently noticed
pragma(inline, true)
which looks extremely useful. A couple of questions :
1. Is this cross-compiler compatible?
Works for LDC and DMD, not sure about GDC, but if it doesn't
support it, it's definitely on Iai
So I'm looking to make changes to the D wiki but I'm not sure who
to talk to about such changes.
Currently: Move all other IDEs low-quality down (maybe to Others)
and focus on just the few that really works (IntelliJ, Visual
Studio Code and Visual Studio). Instead of many options that
don't w
> I've mixed up @fastmath and @fmamath as well. No worries.
Seems like this might be a good awareness opportunity to change one
of the names to be more descriptive and more distinctive.
FWIW, I read half way through threw the thread before I caught onto
the distinction. I can imagine making that
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 04:19:57 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Sunday, 12 July 2020 at 19:16:32 UTC, aberba wrote:
3) packages, now it might be better though. But I've always
felt that there's not a lot of people using D for complete web
dev projects...
I implement most things I need myself;
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 04:04:56PM +, aberba via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> So I'm looking to make changes to the D wiki but I'm not sure who to
> talk to about such changes.
>
> Currently: Move all other IDEs low-quality down (maybe to Others) and
> focus on just the few that really works (
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 16:04:56 UTC, aberba wrote:
So I'm looking to make changes to the D wiki but I'm not sure
who to talk to about such changes.
Currently: Move all other IDEs low-quality down (maybe to
Others) and focus on just the few that really works (IntelliJ,
Visual Studio Cod
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:27:22PM +, tastyminerals via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> D wiki is badly outdated. This is not a fact but a gut feeling after
> reading through some of its pages. I was wondering who's owning it
> myself but never actually dared to just go and update.
Why not
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 11:49:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
The plus sign and anything after is ignored by Dub.
Good to know, thank you.
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 07:12:35 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 15:48:59 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 14:33:47 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/14/20 10:22 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The documentation needs updating, it should say "param
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 07:51:31 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 07:34:59 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:57:21 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:55:51 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:00:46 UTC, tastyminerals
wrote:
36 matches
Mail list logo
