On Saturday, 21 November 2020 at 00:26:03 UTC, Marcone wrote:
// Função receive()
char[] receive(Socket socket, int size = 8192) nothrow {
try {
char[] buffer;
buffer.length = size;
int rq = socket.receive(buffer);
return buf
// Função receive()
char[] receive(Socket socket, int size = 8192) nothrow {
try {
char[] buffer;
buffer.length = size;
int rq = socket.receive(buffer);
return buffer[0..rq];
} catch(Throwable){return null;}
}
s = ne
On Friday, 20 November 2020 at 18:46:40 UTC, Martin wrote:
On Friday, 20 November 2020 at 10:03:18 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
I remember days when I liked UFCS too . Unfortunately it is
not so awesome when you use it with IDE.
And I would like to add: if you use in a bigger team. It's
annoying
On Friday, 20 November 2020 at 19:12:38 UTC, Alaindevos wrote:
I bought the book "D Web Development".
I understand only 20% of the book,the other 80% is way above my
head.
Compare, I own a book on flask development, and I understand
100% of it.
Which means I can use dlang for anything except QT
I bought the book "D Web Development".
I understand only 20% of the book,the other 80% is way above my
head.
Compare, I own a book on flask development, and I understand 100%
of it.
Which means I can use dlang for anything except QT and serious
web development ...
On Friday, 20 November 2020 at 10:03:18 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
I remember days when I liked UFCS too . Unfortunately it is
not so awesome when you use it with IDE.
And I would like to add: if you use in a bigger team. It's
annoying when every dev have a own taste.. And together with
option
On Friday, 20 November 2020 at 15:07:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Wouldn't it be just syntactic sugar for a manually-declared
helper template?
Yeah, there's just both alias and enum helper templates that can
both be useful at times so you might have to use those keywords
in there somewhere too.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:52:41PM +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 20 November 2020 at 14:47:52 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> > There is no way to create an anonymous template in D.
>
> I wish there was, maybe some day we can think of a way to add it to
> the language
On Friday, 20 November 2020 at 14:57:42 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:47:52PM +, Paul Backus via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...]
In this specific case, you could also make `foo` a type-safe
variadic function [1], which would eliminate the need for
`allSatisfy`:
vo
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:47:52PM +, Paul Backus via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> In this specific case, you could also make `foo` a type-safe variadic
> function [1], which would eliminate the need for `allSatisfy`:
>
> void foo(double[] args...)
> {
> // ...
> }
[
On Friday, 20 November 2020 at 14:47:52 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
There is no way to create an anonymous template in D.
I wish there was, maybe some day we can think of a way to add it
to the language.
On Friday, 20 November 2020 at 14:08:23 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
Doing something like below fails because I don't seem to be
able to make a templated lambda that just takes types. Is the
only way to do something similar to create a separate function
to handle the condition, or is there some other way
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:03:18AM +0100, Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
>I remember days when I liked UFCS too . Unfortunately it is not so
>awesome when you use it with IDE. So I am now avoiding UFCS as much
>as possible and it is a much better experience for me.
Doing something like below fails because I don't seem to be able
to make a templated lambda that just takes types. Is the only way
to do something similar to create a separate function to handle
the condition, or is there some other way to do something with
similar flexibility?
import std.std
On Friday, 20 November 2020 at 10:03:18 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
I remember days when I liked UFCS too . Unfortunately it is
not so awesome when you use it with IDE. So I am now avoiding
UFCS as much as possible and it is a much better experience for
me.
Doesn't bother me. Auto-completion
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 8:55 AM Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> ...
> Eh, I wouldn't quite put it that way. If we're thinking of the
> same thread, one person said he thought it was a bad idea. That
> doesn't make it bad practice. It's just his opi
I was the person who wrote that example.
It was just an example to show how it can be used.
I would not write a function call like that when using a literal.
As Mike said, its all up to personal preference.
On 19/11/20 20:51, Vino wrote:
Hi Ali,
Thank you very much, your solution works for my example, but it does not
work for the main goal, let me explain what we are trying to perform.
Nut shell: Try to execute an aws command on sever accounts in parallel
to get some data.
Noe: each account h
18 matches
Mail list logo
