Recovering from memory errors at run time is unreliable.
I should add that I have more like a romantic view of software
release cycles where testing is done until the software is in a
very, very sophisticated and stable state. More than usual.
Not that I want to solely rely on such an
Elimination of memory problems is much more valuable than
detection. Recovering from memory errors at run time is
unreliable.
I'm not sure but I have a gut feeling that I am just in a
position that is not good to defend. I want small software that
fails hard on weak causes, and the industry
The reason this distinction is important, and the reason I
bring up graph theory, is that liveness is impossible to prove.
Seriously: it's impossible, in the general case, for the GC to
prove that an object is still alive. Whereas it's trivial to
prove reachability.
My motivation was
On Sunday, 29 November 2020 at 16:05:04 UTC, Mark wrote:
Hi,
can I ask you something in general? I don't know anyone whom I
could ask. I'm a hobbyist with no science degree or job in
computing, and also know no other programmers.
I have no good understanding why "garbage collection" is a
On Sunday, 29 November 2020 at 21:52:10 UTC, JN wrote:
ValueHolder v2; // error
Make it `ValueHolder!()` and it works.
Default template params are only considered *after* it is clear a
template needs to be instantiated. `ValueHolder` by itself is
just the name of the template which is
class ValueHolder(T = int)
{
T t;
}
void main()
{
ValueHolder!int v1;
ValueHolder v2; // error
}
onlineapp.d(9): Error: template class onlineapp.ValueHolder(T =
int) is used as a type without instantiation; to instantiate it
use ValueHolder!(arguments)
On Sunday, 29 November 2020 at 16:05:04 UTC, Mark wrote:
I have no good understanding why "garbage collection" is a big
thing and why "garbage detection" is no thing (I think so).
Because it's just as expensive to do garbage detection as
automatic garbage collection. So if you're going to go
On Sunday, 29 November 2020 at 20:08:33 UTC, adnan449 wrote:
Hello, I would be greatly thankful if I was given an easy guide
on how to produce windows executables for GtkD applications. I
do not have an access to a windows machine but I need to be
able to produce installers/exe files for the
On Saturday, 28 November 2020 at 15:58:57 UTC, Jack wrote:
So I build a Gtk executable with dmd, following this[1]
tutorial but no tool ldd, nlldd, listdlls[2], dependencies[3]
list the gtk's dlls that the executable, as far I know, depends
on to run, hence the need to install the Gtk
On Sunday, 29 November 2020 at 20:08:33 UTC, adnan449 wrote:
Hello, I would be greatly thankful if I was given an easy guide
on how to produce windows executables for GtkD applications. I
do not have an access to a windows machine but I need to be
able to produce installers/exe files for the
On Sunday, 29 November 2020 at 16:35:26 UTC, Mark wrote:
Maybe I should just install Linux. But ... the drivers... My
Thinkpad just doesn't like any Linux. I run out of ideas.
In the first place all I wanted to do is make some music.
Kind regards
You could try a linux image in VirtualBox
Hello, I would be greatly thankful if I was given an easy guide
on how to produce windows executables for GtkD applications. I do
not have an access to a windows machine but I need to be able to
produce installers/exe files for the windows users.
Users should not have to install any
Looking at Ada now.
I found: Ada is not good for me. It has no augmented assignment.
It's just that I want DRY because I use very verbose variable
names, and in the past I had a real world case (game in Lua)
where I became frustrated when I had to repeat the names. I
understand that NASA or
On 11/27/20 12:05 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
FYI, this bug was just fixed (eventcore version 0.9.11). I tested it and
it works.
Thanks Sönke for fixing this!
-Steve
https://github.com/vibe-d/vibe-core/issues/205
Hooray and congrats to Soenke and team!
I could use AddressSanitizer indirectly by using Go. But their
Oh wait, it was ThreadSanitizer that Go uses, right? I failed at
talking.
I would probably use ASAN under Linux, because that is the right
thing to do?
Looking at Ada now.
On Sunday, 29 November 2020 at 16:21:59 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Sunday, 29 November 2020 at 16:05:04 UTC, Mark wrote:
Thanks a lot for reading, and sorry for a lot of text that is
off-topic and is not related to D.
Sounds like what you want is ASAN? You can use it with plain C
or D(LDC).
Maybe Ada.
On Sunday, 29 November 2020 at 16:05:04 UTC, Mark wrote:
Thanks a lot for reading, and sorry for a lot of text that is
off-topic and is not related to D.
Sounds like what you want is ASAN? You can use it with plain C or
D(LDC).
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html
Hi,
can I ask you something in general? I don't know anyone whom I
could ask. I'm a hobbyist with no science degree or job in
computing, and also know no other programmers.
I have no good understanding why "garbage collection" is a big
thing and why "garbage detection" is no thing (I think
19 matches
Mail list logo
