On 11/12/21 11:00 PM, forkit wrote:
> // nope. writes the line no. of the foreach loop
mixin(m) seems to solve the issue, which I think necessitates 'static if':
static foreach(m; __traits(allMembers, mixin(__MODULE__)))
{
static if(m == "std" || m == "object" || m == "main")
On Saturday, 13 November 2021 at 06:05:37 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Saturday, 13 November 2021 at 05:31:51 UTC, forkit wrote:
Code below is self explanatory.
Any assistance on how to get the line number is welcome ;-)
https://dlang.org/spec/traits.html#getLocation
That?
Thanks. That
On Saturday, 13 November 2021 at 05:31:51 UTC, forkit wrote:
Code below is self explanatory.
Any assistance on how to get the line number is welcome ;-)
https://dlang.org/spec/traits.html#getLocation
That?
Code below is self explanatory.
Any assistance on how to get the line number is welcome ;-)
// ++
module test;
import std;
class myClass{ void foo(){}}
void myFunction1(){}
void main()
{
// list the first user defined member of this module (other
than main)
On Friday, 12 November 2021 at 22:27:48 UTC, forkit wrote:
On Friday, 12 November 2021 at 19:32:31 UTC, Dr Machine Code
wrote:
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 23:51:42 UTC, foxit wrote:
[...]
is your IDE more of a REPL thing?
It's a custom IDE for me, that I wrote using Winforms/C#
(devel
On Friday, 12 November 2021 at 08:12:22 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Maybe there are some metaprogramming advantages, but I cannot
think of any.
Well, one advantage might be that it could be easier to do escape
analysis of C code. Not really sure if there is a difference
compared to doing
On Friday, 12 November 2021 at 19:32:31 UTC, Dr Machine Code
wrote:
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 23:51:42 UTC, foxit wrote:
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 22:35:21 UTC, forkit wrote:
[...]
Actually, the reason I got soo confused is clear to me now.
I have my own GUI IDE, which I wr
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 01:57:10 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 11/11/2021 2:13 PM, Ruby The Roobster wrote:
Branch ~master: Invalid SemVer format: testing.0.0
Branch ~testing: Invalid SemVer format: testing.0.0
Version 0.1.2: Invalid SemVer format: testing.0.0
testing is a branch.
I get this error when trying to compile a program using
[dhtslib](https://github.com/blachlylab/dhtslib) with DMD or any
LDC version < 1.25.0.
```
_D39TypeInfo_S7dhtslib3sam6record9SAMRecord6__initZ: error:
undefined reference to
`_D7dhtslib3sam6record9SAMRecord15__fieldPostblitMFNbNiNlNeZv'
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 23:51:42 UTC, foxit wrote:
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 22:35:21 UTC, forkit wrote:
[...]
Actually, the reason I got soo confused is clear to me now.
I have my own GUI IDE, which I wrote myself (winforms/C#) cause
I got so fed up with creating/saving
On Friday, 12 November 2021 at 15:10:19 UTC, max haughton wrote:
Not always. The attribute is intended for naked asm since
inlining could be completely wrong in this case.
Got that! Thanks for the info!
On Friday, 12 November 2021 at 11:32:16 UTC, rempas wrote:
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 19:22:33 UTC, max haughton
wrote:
There's an attribute to tell it the function is safe to inline.
And can't you do that with inline asm?
Not always. The attribute is intended for naked asm since
inl
On Friday, 12 November 2021 at 00:46:05 UTC, Elronnd wrote:
GCC can do it. Somewhat notoriously, LTO can lead to bugs from
underspecified asm constraints following cross-TU inlining.
That's really interesting to hear! Do we have any cases where
this happened to software that was used for pr
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 19:22:33 UTC, max haughton wrote:
There's an attribute to tell it the function is safe to inline.
And can't you do that with inline asm?
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 02:03:22 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I don't think ImportC is that much of a game changer (you can
already make C bindings with quite a small effort, and there
are tools to get you 90% there), but a broken/not working
ImportC will be a huge drawback to the
15 matches
Mail list logo
