On Wednesday, 28 September 2022 at 05:29:41 UTC, Chris Piker
wrote:
`Xmake` is indeed simpler.
`Xmake` is really nice!
On Wednesday, 7 September 2022 at 00:31:53 UTC, zjh wrote:
`xmake` is simpler.
Thanks for the recommendation. Was struggling with cmake for a
dependent clib. Xmake is indeed simpler.
On Tuesday, 27 September 2022 at 23:18:06 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 September 2022 at 22:39:52 UTC, torhu wrote:
How would I achieve something like this, do I have to turn the
aliases into functions?
You can write it out long-form with two steps like this:
Thank you, works lik
On Tuesday, 27 September 2022 at 22:39:52 UTC, torhu wrote:
How would I achieve something like this, do I have to turn the
aliases into functions?
You can write it out long-form with two steps like this:
---
template _messageBox(string title, int style)
{
void _messageBox(T...)(T args)
On Tuesday, 27 September 2022 at 22:39:52 UTC, torhu wrote:
How would I achieve something like this, do I have to turn the
aliases into functions?
```d
void _messageBox(string title, int style, T...)(T args)
{
string s = format(args);
/* etc... */
}
alias _messageBox!(APPNAME, SWT.ICON
How would I achieve something like this, do I have to turn the
aliases into functions?
```d
void _messageBox(string title, int style, T...)(T args)
{
string s = format(args);
/* etc... */
}
alias _messageBox!(APPNAME, SWT.ICON_INFORMATION) info;
alias _messageBox!("Warning", SWT.ICON_WA
On 28/09/2022 7:18 AM, Alain De Vos wrote:
Don't forget there is also BSD
Should already be supported.
Platform specific settings are supported through the use of field name
suffixes. Suffixes are dash separated list of operating
system/architecture/compiler identifiers, as defined in the D
Don't forget there is also BSD
Alternatively we could just extend platforms to work in places other
than configurations.
https://dub.pm/package-format-json.html#configuration-settings
On 9/26/22 4:57 PM, Christian Köstlin wrote:
Or posix only? Or not windows?
Kind regards,
Christian
We have specific directives based on os, I had an idea that you could
say something like:
```json
"dependencies-windows": {
"not-available" : "*"
}
```
But it still tries to find this pa
On 27.09.22 13:07, Ahmet Sait wrote:
On Monday, 26 September 2022 at 20:57:06 UTC, Christian Köstlin wrote:
Or posix only? Or not windows?
Kind regards,
Christian
Not necessarily a dub solution but you can do something like this:
```d
version(Posix) { }
else
static assert(0, "Unsupported
On Monday, 26 September 2022 at 20:57:06 UTC, Christian Köstlin
wrote:
Or posix only? Or not windows?
Kind regards,
Christian
Not necessarily a dub solution but you can do something like this:
```d
version(Posix) { }
else
static assert(0, "Unsupported platform.");
```
This will result in a
12 matches
Mail list logo