On 3/12/23 16:14, FozzieBear wrote:
> On Sunday, 12 March 2023 at 15:09:45 UTC, Salih Dincer wrote:
>>
>> ...
>
> So I don't agree with part of this comment (made elsewhere in this
thread):
>
> "You can live without 'const' until your code interacts with other
> people's code."
My comment was
On Friday, 17 March 2023 at 20:53:07 UTC, WB wrote:
On Thursday, 16 March 2023 at 22:07:04 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
Hello,
The problem is when i compile with DMD i get:
```
??:0
```
When i compile it with GDC i get proper file + line
What does GDC do different than DMD?
Is there a way to get
On Thursday, 16 March 2023 at 22:07:04 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
Hello,
The problem is when i compile with DMD i get:
```
??:0
```
When i compile it with GDC i get proper file + line
What does GDC do different than DMD?
Is there a way to get the same result as GDC with DMD?
Thanks
Did you
On Thursday, 16 March 2023 at 12:32:34 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
With -preview=nosharedaccess, I get:
int y = 2;
shared int x = y; // OK
assert(x == 2); // no error
y = x; // error
So for the assignment to y, reading x is an error and
atomicLoad should be used instead. But
On Thursday, 16 March 2023 at 20:53:28 UTC, Witold wrote:
I ported a classic DeltaBlue benchmark to D, and for
allocations I use a mix of malloc/free (for structs with some
trailing inline arrays), and new for some other structs and
arrays.
After running it, it felt kind of slow (I did not
