On Saturday, 2 March 2024 at 09:18:58 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Saturday, 2 March 2024 at 08:41:40 UTC, Salih Dincer wrote:
SLM,
What exactly did this patch with the new update fix?
Nothing, it looks like what happened is that the issue was
wrongly referenced by a dlang.org PR
(https://github
A way to do this without spawning threads manually:
```d
import std.parallelism : TaskPool, parallel, taskPool, defaultPoolThreads;
import std.stdio : writeln;
import std.range : iota;
enum NSWEPT = 1_000_000;
enum NCPU = 4;
void main() {
import core.atomic : atomicLoad, atomicOp;
shar
I tried a shared memory parallel increment. Yes, it's basically
a cache line thrasher, but I wanted to see what's involved in
shared memory programming. Even though I tried to follow all the
rules to make true shared memory (not thread local) it appears I
failed, as the wait loop at the end o
On Saturday, 2 March 2024 at 19:29:47 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Saturday, 2 March 2024 at 19:28:08 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Saturday, 2 March 2024 at 19:11:42 UTC, kinke wrote:
Not according to run.dlang.io, for all available DMD
versions. Perhaps your tested `S` was nested in some
function
